People

Sylvia Browne

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Featured Item

A Secret of the Universe
A Secret of the Universe

Add to Cart

TAM 5.5 DVD Set
TAM 5.5 DVD Set

Add to Cart

Events Calendar

« < May 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Event Registration

Jun 19 2008 - Jun 22 2008 The Amaz!ng Meeting 6, Flamingo Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas

SWIFT December 28, 2007 Print E-mail
Written by James Randi   
Tuesday, 25 December 2007
Table of Contents
  1. There Are Other Gods Out There

  2. Nice Try

  3. An Expensive Magical Rod

  4. Finding Significance

  5. Not Just Yet

  6. Playing the God Card

  7. Saccharine Sooth

  8. Tune In

  9. Still Scamming

  10. Medical Mythology Addressed

  11. Viewer Comments

  12. The Secret’s Out

  13. Very Wise Words

  14. Do This

  15. Neatly and Evasively Done

  16. In Conclusion…



There Are Other Gods Out There

commandments

Reader and frequent commentator Avital Pilpel has sent me a 334-word message that I will give you here in full, not only because it’s interesting and from an expert, but because it’s brief enough for you to handle easily. Had it been 350 words… Referring to the item at randi.org/joom/content/view/142/27/#i2, Mr. Pilpel writes:

In your discussion with Jay Roessler, both of you are – slightly – wrong, due to translation problems.

The original Hebrew says, "Lo ihyu lachem elohim acherim al panay" – you shall have no other Gods al panay. Literally, "al panay" means "on my face." It is an Hebrew idiom, meaning "in preference to me." It is often used elsewhere in the Bible in matrimonial matters, i.e., when someone divorces one wife and marries another al paneyha – "over her face" – that is, in preference to her.

The ten commandments, like many other interactions between Jehovah and the Israelites (or their patriarchs) in the Bible, are written in the language of a marriage contract. The Israelites promise to "worship no other God in preference" to Jehovah, while He, in return, agrees to "only recognize you from all the families [i.e., tribes, nations] of the Earth." The treaty concludes, "You shall be my Nation and I shall be your God." There is no implication in those parts of the Bible that other gods do not exist, or that Jehovah is necessarily the most powerful God of some pantheon (let alone all-powerful), any more than there is a claim that the Israelites are the only nation on earth or the most powerful one.

This type of belief, which assumes other gods exist but demands a special relationship a specific god and a specific tribe – in particular, that preference (or exclusivity) in “worship” be given to that god – is known as henotheism. It can be seen as a stage between full polytheism (when other gods may be worshipped freely) and monotheism (when it is denied that other gods exist at all, and not merely forbidden to worship them). Some of the most important parts of the Bible – Jehovah's appearance in Mt. Sinai to give the Israelites the ten commandments, the pact between Abraham and Jehovah that makes Palestine the "promised land," etc. – are henotheistic. The Jews only became monotheistic, for complicated reasons, long after these parts of the Bible were written.

Okay, and I see that this comment only supports even more my contention that there is nothing in the Bible that says the God they endorse and so admire, is the only deity…! Is this a “find,” or what?

Several of those who posted comments on last week’s page also reflected these observations of Mr. Pilpel, though less specifically. Thank you!




NICE TRY

Reader Ron Holmstrom in Chugiak, Alaska, wrote to a local FOX-TV show there about their coverage of a recent near-disaster in which a family of four was rescued after having been lost in a mountainous area. A “psychic” had been called in for consultation (Wow! On FOX-TV? Quelle surprise!) and was credited by the station with having been helpful. Ron was insulted by the applied slant of the story, and he wrote:

When the relative first told the story this morning, the "psychic" had supposedly told authorities the location and the owner's name of the cabin where the lost family was holed-up.

Now that it has turned out that they were actually sheltered in a culvert, how will the story change so the fortune-teller can be famous? The "psychic" said they were in a cabin and she could sense the cabin owner's name! They were in a CULVERT! Guessing whether they were alive or not could be determined by flipping a coin.

Jeez!

The TV station responded:

We said that earlier... sorry you missed it.

Ron was not to be easily pushed aside:

I did hear it. The problem is, that was what made her prediction wrong. Further coverage has omitted this. This sort of thing is simply what props up superstitious claptrap. Unfair.

Oh well…

Now you have carefully omitted the most important details of what the "psychic" allegedly told the grandmother. Namely: That the family was in a cabin and that she knew the name of the cabin owner. I know facts like that can louse up a good gee-whiz story, but come on!

By the way, I am writing to you from my cabin in Alaska. That would be my cabin, not my culvert.

Ron, join us in resignation to the fact that the media wants, needs, prefers and thrives on woo-woo, in total disregard for inconvenient facts. Here in Florida, on another “lost family” episode with a similarly satisfactory result, I counted 17 designations of this event as a “miracle” during one local news report. No, a miracle should be a little more stunning than a rescue effort that works out, I think. And, when the rescue fails, perhaps we should wonder whether the angels were off carousing somewhere, or God was out on the celestial golf course, and missed the request for a miracle…




AN EXPENSIVE MAGICAL ROD

pipe

From reader Dean Malandris we received notice of this truly hilarious – yet still fraudulent – web site. Dean describes it as, “For the truly intellectually handicapped, a great web site,” and I enthusiastically agree. It’s to be found at toolsforwellness.com. Says Dean:

Pretty much all of your favorite woo-woo products under the convenience of one on-line store. Devout believers can truly have a field day, poring over the catalogue. My personal favorite has to be the copper tube they charge $220 for: toolsforwellness.com/safespaceiii.html. As they say in the movies, "I gotta get me one o' THESE!"

NOT.

I note that the validity of this device seems appropriately indicated by the “click to enlarge” note – which when clicked on the site, gives you exactly the same-size graphic… and the text for this “Tools for Wellness” advertisement reads, in part:

This powerful 20-inch copper tube holds imprinted holographic bars, programmed to neutralize and protect up to 200 acres of land.

If you need to permanently eradicate noxious vibrations on your property this is for you. This self-driven broadcaster rod is designed to be placed in the ground to address imbalanced energies in the soil and earth.

Shielding against Geopathic Stress from harmful earth grid systems and earth fault lines reduces the effect of electromagnetic radiation (EMR).

The energy pattern the Safe Space 3 radiates is designed to clear a range of toxic energies and negative etheric forces from the land as well as the atmosphere of the area. It can have a strengthening and calming effect on all living within the area.

Briefly: There is no such thing as a “powerful” “holographic bar” – let alone an “imprinted” one. No such “programming” is possible, the “neutralization” and “protection” claimed are imaginary, no such “vibrations” – “noxious” or otherwise – exist, the rod “broadcasts” nothing, and it’s not “designed” to do anything but extract money from the naïve. The “imbalanced energies” cited, are imaginary, “Geopathic Stress” is a fiction, there are no ‘harmful” “earth grid systems or earth fault lines” – real or imaginary – and “electromagnetic radiation” of any sort is totally unaffected by having a magical copper rod buried in the area; EMR is always there. There’s no “energy pattern” “radiated” by this rod, no “toxic energies and negative etheric forces” – whatever they may be – are “cleared” by this means, and the vendors cannot demonstrate any effects whatsoever from the use of their fake device.

Or, I may be wrong, in which case a legal action brought by the vendors of the “Safe Space 3” product will easily prove their case and cause the JREF huge financial losses in favor of the vendor. We await such an action.

Hello…?

(I must admit that Dean exaggerated the price of this wonder. It’s only $219.95… and I note the subtly imbedded “20,” “200,” and “220” magical sequence in their text…)




FINDING SIGNIFICANCE

Here’s an excerpt from an otherwise excellent and well-thought-out story at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation [CBC] site at cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_handler/20071219.html by Richard Handler, their “Ideas Guy.” It’s titled, “Moments of extraordinary knowing.”

We all have heard stories that can't quite be explained. Let me end [this item] on one of mine.

Years ago I was lying in bed at night and I became besieged by wracking pain. It was as if I was on a torture bench. It kept me awake all night.

I flayed and moaned. Then, in the very early morning, the pain subsided. A little later, my mother called. She told me my father had died of a heart attack.

Now the Amazing Randi would ask me: How many other times have I been wracked by pain, woke up and forgot about it? I would say, not many. And this pain was special, out of the ordinary. But could I prove it? No.

So Randi would be skeptical. He may be right to be.

I just think that perhaps something else was going on. Something I don't understand and that cannot be explained in ways we all comprehend.

Perhaps I am guilty of wishful thinking, of wanting the world to be more mysterious and more spiritually connected than it is. Still, this story fits in nicely with the holiday season, where human possibility is celebrated, whether you believe in strange things or not.

For Mr. Handler, I’ll offer here a repeat of a comment I published here in October of last year. I was discussing this same “finding significance” phenomenon”:

Let me give you another example of this phenomenon from my own experience.

As a teen, I was often hired by neighbors as a babysitter. I'd take along some books, check that the kid or kids were in bed, and stretch out on a couch to read and/or listen to the radio. I seldom had any sort of situation develop, and I'd often fall asleep. One night, the parents who'd hired me were rather late returning, but shortly before they returned home, I woke to the sound of labored, rather uneven breathing that seemed to fill the living room. Suddenly it stopped, and everything was silent. I was left wondering, and somewhat disturbed. Not more than ten minutes later, the parents walked in and relieved me of my duties. It was about midnight.

The next morning, I awoke to find my father looking very sad, and was told that my grandfather — his father — had died the night before, in Montreal, 300 miles away. Of course, my mind flashed back to the phenomenon I'd experienced, and I had to consider the possibility that the old man — with whom I'd had a very close relationship — had shared his last moments with me via some unknown modus.

But then I had to think back about the whole picture. My grandfather, we knew at that time, was in a bad way. He was not expected to live much longer, and his demise was really just a matter of time. We'd been ready for the bad news for several weeks. It appeared to me that I'd probably worked the strange sounds I'd heard into a fuller picture that had been suggested by the situation. However, I had to find it remarkable that such a unique phenomenon had occurred at just the time that it might have been expected. Fortunately, a week or so later I was relieved of any such conclusion.

I was again employed as a babysitter at the same home. I settled in as usual, on the couch. Suddenly, I became aware of the same breathing pattern that I'd heard at about the same time the week previous. Pulling the couch away from the wall, I found that the hot-air duct for the living-room was located directly below the position that my head occupied as I reclined on the couch. I quietly made my way upstairs to the baby's bedroom, directly above the living-room. The baby's crib was adjacent to the air duct which connected to the duct below. As it happened, the baby was still rolled over with her face very close to the register grate — I had been hearing the labored breathing of the infant, not of the shade of my grandfather!

It's not very often that solutions to such seemingly strange phenomena present themselves so easily. Perhaps I'm just lucky in that respect. However, I do believe that if we were to search for more ordinary explanations rather than opting to invent or adopt paranormal explanations, we'd have a much better grasp of how the real world works, though professional writers might find their wells of inspiration going dry...

That’s my account, and now let’s look at Mr. Handler’s experience.

Importantly, I note that we’re not given the nature nor the location of the “wracking pain” suffered by the author. The pain of a heart attack can consist of discomfort or numbness in the center of the chest, uncomfortable pressure, squeezing, fullness or pain in one or both arms, the back, neck, jaw or stomach, shortness of breath, and/or breaking out in a sweat. Believe me. I went through all this. Also, we aren’t told at what hour the pain was experienced by him, and whether that might provide a parallel to the distress suffered by his father, nor do we learn whether his father already had a heart condition and would have been expected to have such an attack.

I believe that Mr. Handler is choosing to create a false association for this event, which he would have written off as a rather memorable but not significant night-time experience, if the death of his father had not occurred in conjunction with it. By our vary nature, we humans tend to easily make such associations. This practice tends to “round out” the picture for us and provide a more satisfactory conclusion. People who bet a “lucky number” in a lottery and win, or who choose a winning horse by the color of the livery, may similarly choose to assign significance. Mind you, Mr. Handler has made allowance for the possibility of such psychological phenomena in his article, and I’m sure he would not try to point out this recalled event as proof of anything, so he’s “off the hook,” clearly…!




NOT JUST YET

Last week Texas Commissioner of Higher Education Raymund Paredes wrote a letter to The New York Times. See randi.org/joom/content/view/142/27/#i9 for our brief comment on the matter which concerns him. He wrote:

wilson

Re “Green Light for Institute on Creation in Texas” (news article, Dec. 19):

I would like to be clear that there is no “green light.” There is a process for considering applications for authorization that the state follows with all applicants, and we are in the early stages of considering the Institute for Creation Research’s effort to offer online master’s degrees in science education.

The advisory panel’s report is just that – advisory – and as commissioner of higher education, I have the authority to accept, reject or modify its recommendations. I am reviewing the report and seeking more information and advice from scientists to evaluate the program and make recommendations to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board on Jan. 24.

The board has the authority to accept, reject or modify my recommendations. So we are a long way from making a final determination in giving a green light.

The primary goal in reviewing the application is to consider whether the program will contribute to helping high-school students be successful in rigorous college science courses. In evaluating it, we will make certain Texas remains hospitable to high-quality science education and scientific research.

This is hardly a matter that can or should be submitted to any “board” for a vote. Would Commissioner Paredes’ board take under consideration the question of whether or not to leave cookies and milk for Santa Claus? That is just as legitimate a question. In my opinion, any program that is – right up-front – clearly not only unscientific, but anti-scientific – as creationism is – should not have to undergo deep thought and mulling over by a committee to decide whether it would be suitable for a science curriculum. Creationism is not part of science. It may be a part of philosophy or what Nobel-winning chemist Irving Langmuir, in his famous 1953 essay, dubbed “pathological science,” but it should not enter classrooms except as a religious subject.




PLAYING THE GOD CARD

Reader Frank Monaco quotes presidential candidate Mitt Romney on MSNBC:.

I was amazed that a potential leader of our country would say this:

The creator does deserve to be in the public square, that we are a nation that was founded based on principles of faith and we're not going to sweep that away and become a secular nation.

Adds Frank:

I thought we have always been a secular nation?

Gee, I thought so too, Frank. It just shows how we can be ignorant of the basics of democracy and the true structure of the system. Or perhaps Mitt Romney was just trying for a few votes from the terminally religious…?

Nah…

While we’re here, I’ll just express a personal opinion about this situation. I’ve been hearing so many pundits preach that the religious affiliation and the convictions of a candidate should not be matters brought into consideration by the voters. That’s ridiculous. Think: if religion is a paramount element in a candidate’s thinking, morality, behavior, decision-making, attitude, and philosophy, then it should be the major element to be considered by a voter! Heaven or Hell, survival into the Afterlife or Everlasting Torment, damnation or eternal bliss – these are paramount matters, aren’t they? In my mind, the turning point for my vote will be to select a candidate who I perceive as playing the I-love-God game solely in order to win – because he/she cannot win an election without embracing mythology, even if only cosmetically. If elected, that candidate just might be able to make a presidential decision based on evidence and rationality, rather than on an ancient and totally naïve book written by understandably uninformed authors…




SACCHARINE SOOTH

If you have 5 minutes and 49 seconds to be entertained by “Veronica” – not her favorite name, as she says, but one she adopts to more easily speak to lower-vibration folks like us – go to youtube.com/watch?v=g1ctJimXu2w and enjoy. An anonymous reader sent me there, saying that

We puny three dimensional beings can be and see so much more with the help of "VERONICA". Referenced web pages can be found at: InnerWhispers.info, and at AprilCrawford.info.

But be sure to brush your teeth immediately after. The sugary traces might cause caries…

If you’ve survived this, you might want to travel on to new heights of idiocy with these, sent in by a reader who found them through the "Science and Technology" category at YouTube. He comments:

I had welcomed the recent return of the "Science and Technology" category at YouTube that had been removed about a year ago. But it bothers me that videos like this end up in the category. Then I stumbled across this video: youtube.com/watch?v=6dvMGzCK7kM of another channeler in the "Science and Technology" category. I then discovered that this person has posted 860 videos since Aug 6, 2007. See youtube.com/profile?user=DesteniProductions. That's more than 6 videos per day. This person channels historical figures, celebrities, random people, animals, things. It's just too bizarre and sad. Here is just a very small sample of these:

youtube.com/watch?v=OMpNkAtJmo4 (The first video)
youtube.com/watch?v=1KSQ2wxEviU (A dog/girl in heaven)
youtube.com/watch?v=cFTmkgSesZo (Nostradamus)
youtube.com/watch?v=3oXZE0eoqUw (The first molecule in the Universe)
youtube.com/watch?v=yRJIuFWWCNc (Bees)
youtube.com/watch?v=GIdW-9P1rhc (Ingmar Bergman)
youtube.com/watch?v=O_Xah69uUsE (Mother Teresa)

I’m sure you won’t be able to look at all these, or want to, but maybe this could be a good school project on delusional pastimes for a student with very bad judgment?




TUNE IN

Reader/author Geoff Gilpin (see randi.org/joom/content/view/141/#i6) informs us:

Put some cosmic consciousness in your holiday with my upcoming interview on public radio. I’ll be appearing on “To the Best of Our Knowledge,” a program that airs on the NPR, PRI, and XM satellite networks. Dates and times vary by station, but most listeners will get the program on Sunday, December 30th. Check the following page for a list of stations and air times: www.wpr.org/book/stations.html.




STILL SCAMMING

From Wired.com we received a list of “The Top 10 Heartbreaking Gadgets of 2007,” and #2 on their list is the Steorn Company, which we referred to back at randi.org/jr/2007-07/070607steorn.html#i1. The item reads:

Eternal energy from the Emerald Isle, that's what Steorn promised us with Orbo. The Irish company pitched us a perpetual-motion machine that would change the world using "time-variant magneto-mechanical interactions." Instead we got a plastic wheel with dodgy bearings and a press conference full of so many blatant lies it embarrassed even us. Sure, we'd all love free energy, but handing a toy out to 22 hand-picked scientists isn't going to do it. We'd be better off tying a piece of buttered toast to the back of a cat and throwing the tandem out the window. And hey, at Wired News we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

Add to this another mention from Wired News as 2007 vanishes into history:

It's time again to inhale the fumes of failure. Every December, Wired News asks its readers to nominate their choices for our annual Vaporware awards. We hand out accolades (and raspberries) to the most-prized products that were promised but never delivered. Reader votes have helped whittle the list down to the top 10 honorees for the 2007 Podium of Shame. So, with a quick nod to this year's honorable mention – Iran's nuclear weapons program – let's savor the vapor, starting with the bottom of the short list.

#10. The Steorn Orbo:

At the close of 2006, the Dublin-based firm Steorn announced the creation of the Orbo, a magnetic motor device that generates free, constant energy. In other words, a perpetual-motion machine. Steorn claims its technology can be used in everything "from portable music players to cars.”

First law of thermodynamics be damned, Steorn planned a public demonstration for July 2007. The display was ultimately cancelled.

The company promises to eventually reveal the Orbo's inner workings, but Wired News reader Randomeis thinks he has it figured out: "It runs on the unlimited supply of VC (venture capitalist) gullibility."

You can see the incredible nerve still being exhibited and advertised by this company of Irish scam-artists at www.steorn.com. And they’ll still be here in 2009, when that rolls around…

Reader Jeff Snowden sends us to tinyurl.com/2rrlsk to read what he calls, “a classic example of True Believer diplomacy” contributed by a poster known as “Naked Robot” – who explains himself quite adequately…




MEDICAL MYTHOLOGY ADDRESSED

Courtesy of the Children’s Health Services Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Regenstrief Institute – both of Indianapolis, Indiana – we now have a good examination of a number of rather well-accepted medical notions that may not be as firm as we’d thought. The seven immediately cited are:

1. People should drink at least eight glasses of water a day
2. We use only 10% of our brains
3. Hair and fingernails continue to grow after death
4. Shaving hair causes it to grow back faster, darker, or coarser
5. Reading in dim light ruins your eyesight
6. Eating turkey makes people especially drowsy
7. Mobile phones create considerable electromagnetic interference in hospitals.

The researchers wisely and carefully conclude:

Despite their popularity, all of these medical beliefs range from unproved to untrue. Although this was not a systematic review of either the breadth of medical myths or of all available evidence related to each myth, the search methods produced a large number of references. While some of these myths simply do not have evidence to confirm them, others have been studied and proved wrong.

Physicians would do well to understand the evidence supporting their medical decision making. They should at least recognize when their practice is based on tradition, anecdote, or art. While belief in the described myths is unlikely to cause harm, recommending medical treatment for which there is little evidence certainly can. Speaking from a position of authority, as physicians do, requires constant evaluation of the validity of our knowledge.

I’m particularly happy with numbers 2 and 7. Visit bmj.com/cgi/content/short/335/7633/1288 for the full discussion.




VIEWER COMMENTS…

The advent on YouTube of the Geller video from last week brought a number of interesting comments from viewers. Only seven are given here, with a few minor grammatical corrections, FYI:

Geller

The only benefit to the existence of Uri Geller is that his body acts as a natural carbon sink. Thanks Uri. Because of you, global warming is slightly slower than it otherwise would be.

I am legitimately saddened that Skeptics are the last ones protecting the sanctity of the enlightenment, its values of logic, the scientific method, and critical thinking. The fact that charlatans like Sylvia Browne, John Edward & Uri Geller are worth billions, and even our greatest mind, Randi, is worth a fraction of that, tells me very sad truths about what we value as a culture.

May we never forget what Randi does, and may we never lose our sense of logic!

Apparently he's about to come out and say he's been lying for the last 30+ years and try and slip into the magical society nice and quiet. That just AIN’T gonna happen, every magician everywhere knows all about him and his lies and NOBODY is going to forgive and forget just like that.

"A key can be displayed in such a way that it looks like it's bending. Just by stroking it, you'd swear that it's bending right up before your eyes. Magicians call this process ratcheting. But to do this, the key has to be bent in advance." – James Randi in [PBS “Nova”] "Secrets of the Psychics."

It’s videos like this and James Randi that make me not so disappointed in humanity and its logic.

It’s an illusion… it just appears as if it’s bending upwards, but in real life he is just inclining it.




THE SECRET’S OUT

spoon

At tinyurl.com/24yfsb the UK’s Daily Mail newspaper has just published a complete explanation of the spoon-bending trick so dear to Uri Geller, and I’m sure the fur will be flying in all directions. The explanation they provide is quite correct, though it doesn’t cover the spoon-breaking stunt. I wonder if they’d be interested in knowing about that, as well? I’m available…




VERY WISE WORDS

ARW

While watching a re-run of the 1996 BBC program, "Attenborough in Paradise" a wonderful documentary filmed in Papua New Guinea's jungles on the remarkable Birds of Paradise found there, I heard Sir David read a quotation from Alfred Russel Wallace, the man who proposed – in parallel with Charles Darwin – a theory of “natural selection.” While Wallace was a fully-developed woo-woo in regards to spiritualism and certain aspects of brain functions, he also wrote these perceptive words, dealing with the Birds of Paradise:

I thought of the long ages of the past, during which the successive generations of this little creature have run their course – year by year being born and living and dying amid these dark and gloomy woods with no intelligent eye to gaze upon their loveliness, to all appearances such a wanton waste of beauty… It seems sad, that on the one hand such exquisite creatures should live out their lives and exhibit their charms only in these wild inhospitable regions… This consideration should surely tell us that all living things were not made for Man. Many of them have no relation to him, their happiness and enjoyments, their loves and hates, their struggles for existence, their rigorous life and early death, would seem to be immediately related to their own well-being and perpetuation, alone.

Apparently, Sir Richard agreed with Wallace’s observation. He closed the program with the quotation, and merely added, “Indeed so.”




DO THIS

Go to tinyurl.com/yp8fjp for a Washington Post piece by Sally Quinn, read it, and then think about my contention that we’re already immersed in a full-blown theocracy…




NEATLY AND EVASIVELY DONE

Reader Jim Boskus sent us this:

I am writing to you because, once again, I have encountered quackery that needs to be challenged. I recently received a catalog as a supplement with our daily newspaper. This catalog is a listing of the classes being offered by the Duchess Association for Continuing Education, an organization that offers classes for all ages under the sponsorship of the local school district. One particular class got my attention. Here is the course description:

Course #9464 $75

Dowsing Human Energy Fields For Self Improvement and Well-Being – by John Carter, PhD, BCH, CI

This introductory course will teach you how to apply dowsing rods for assessing human energy fields, chakras, and blocks to attain the most appropriate levels for personal achievement and well-being. Learn techniques for assessments of emotional issues; addressing them, promoting strong and powerful frames of mind, and correcting the imbalances in the energy field. Wear loose fitting clothes, bring a pillow and a water bottle.

 

I was aghast that this organization would offer such a class under the guise of "education." I promptly fired off this email to the organization's Class Coordinator:

Good day Ms. Turcio,

I am writing because I have received the DACE catalog of classes being offered for Spring 2008, and there is one class that troubles me. On page 8 there is a description for a course titled "Dowsing Human Energy Fields." According to the catalog, this course will "teach you how to apply dowsing rods for assessing human energy fields." You will also "learn techniques for correcting the imbalances in energy fields."

I am curious as to how this nonsense is included in a course catalog that contains "education" in its name. In case you aren't aware, dowsing (for ANYTHING) has been repeatedly proven to be completely ineffective. There is ZERO EVIDENCE to demonstrate that dowsing works. In fact, if the instructor for this course (John Carter) can prove that he can detect "human energy fields" by dowsing he would be awarded ONE MILLION DOLLARS by the James Randi Educational Foundation (you can find the details at www.randi.org.

I am quite certain, however, that your instructor would not be able to demonstrate this ability in any sort of controlled environment. Did you even challenge him to prove that he has this remarkable power before scheduling this class? What if I told you that I could teach techniques that will allow you to communicate with fairies and leprechauns? Would you allow me to teach a class too? Well, this is no more outrageous than what your instructor can supposedly teach.

I find it incredible that the Arlington Central School District is sponsoring this garbage. What's next? Classes on woo-woo nonsense like "Communicating With Your Spirit Guide," "Techniques for Remote Viewing," or perhaps "How to Interpret Tarot Cards"?

"Teaching" bilge like dowsing has no place in a legitimate educational institution. Sponsoring a class like this gives credibility to the purveyors of this nonsense that they simply do not deserve. I hope you give more thought in the future as to the nature of your course offerings. I can only hope that no tax money was used in the promotion or presentation of this "class."

I just want to add that if you are not the person who approved this class, please let me know who did. I want to make sure I'm communicating with the right person.

I have yet to receive a reply. If you'd like, I'll forward to you any response that comes my way. I thought that perhaps this is something you could use in your weekly column. It's important that people realize there is a lot of work to do when it comes to promoting reason and rationality.

I answered Jim:

Yes, please let us know if you receive a response. My own communication sent to Ms. Turcio is shown here:

Ms. Turcio:

I hereby officially offer the million-dollar prize of the James Randi Educational Foundation to Dr. John Carter, who I understand will be offering a course for the DACE catalog of classes being offered for Spring 2008. If he can show in a simple, definitive, double-blind, test, that dowsing works – in any way that he prefers to demonstrate – the prize will be awarded.

This is a legitimate offer, which I predict Dr. Carter will turn down – and I ask you to consider why he would refuse to be tested, with a one-million-dollar prize to be so easily won...

Please refer to randi.org/joom/content/view/38/31/ for the details of the challenge.

Remember, I predict that Dr. Carter will decline to be tested. If I'm wrong, we will immediately set in motion a simple test of his claims.

As I’d expected, I had no response whatsoever to this offer. Then I heard again from Jim Boskus:

I finally received a reply from Karen Turcio. Here it is:

I am in receipt of your three emails as well as the one included from James Landi. Our continuing education program has a vast variety of programs to fit many different interests and is considered to be informational and/or recreational in nature. The Arlington Continuing Education Program is a self-supporting program. The program is funded solely by class fees and no taxpayer dollars are used.

Thank you for you concern. I trust that you will understand that taking classes is a matter of choice and the choices offered include areas that you may or may not believe in nor wish to participate in, but that there are others that do and will. I will keep your suggestions in mind when scheduling future semesters.

Sincerely, Karen Turcio Coordinator, Arlington Continuing Adult/Community Education Program

Yes, Ms. Turcio used “Landi,” I’m sure in innocent error, since she is obviously far removed from such matters as checking out the validity of doubtful claims…

Her response is pretty much what I expected. She doesn't address the issue at all. She merely talks about how their programs are "informational or recreational in nature." She also says that the classes offered "include areas that you may or may not believe in.” She fails to understand that my "beliefs" have nothing to do with it. The issue here is that they are offering a "class" where the instructor is making an unsubstantiated claim. How this falls under the guise of "education" escapes me.

I also notice that she does not respond to your challenge AT ALL.

I'll be following up on this and I'll let you know how things progress.

I don't know if she sent a reply to you or not. I'll probably respond to her, but since she works for a school district I'm guessing that she won't be back to work until after the New Year. At the very least I would like her to put me in contact with this "Dr. John Carter" who is the class instructor.

I find it interesting that she does not respond to my comments about dowsing being bunk. She just says that "the choices offered include areas that you may or may not believe in nor wish to participate in, but that there are others that do and will." So there you have it. If there are people who want to "learn" nonsense, then we'll teach it to them! Just incredible...

I'll keep you informed as to any future exchanges I have with her.

Well, Jim, I’m pretty sure that you’ll not hear another peep from “coordinator” Karen Turcio. She’s already provided you with one response and that’s more than the large majority of such officials choose to give such inquiries. Ms. Turcio is in a secure and comfortable position. She’s handled, with alacrity, your suggestion that tax money might have been misappropriated, but she has chosen to ignore the problem of whether or not the consumers of this service are being cheated, misled, or deceived; that’s not in her assigned list of duties. This is the attitude of many such low-level authorities, and probably always will be.

However, if a damaged consumer of these spurious services should sue, or if a higher-placed authority should choose to question the wisdom of Ms. Turcio’s decision, that would be a very different matter indeed. But relax, Ms. Turcio. You’re safe, and the consumers will spend their money, take their lumps and go away. The school system will happily take the income, and your job will be done.

Also, “Dr” Carter won’t notice any of this; he’ll just flounder around as always, perhaps even believing what he teaches, ignoring the million-dollar prize we’ve offered him for doing what he does as a profession – when he could just do it – to win a million dollars. And no one will wonder just why.

We know why.




IN CONCLUSION

When shall we three meet again, in thunder, lightning or in rain…?

Oh. Sorry. I’m rather carried away by the upcoming production of Shakespeare’s MacBeth conceived and directed by our friend Teller – of Penn & Teller – and artistic director Aaron Posner, which will run from January 15th through February 10th at the Two River Theater Company in Red Bank, New Jersey – my old stamping grounds. Ticket sales have been so brisk that the run has extended its winter production by eight more shows added to the original performance schedule.

But the answer to the question above, is, "next year." There will be a few startling announcements to be made next week… There was a high-level meeting of the JREF Executive Board last week, and there will be drastic changes at the Foundation.

Our talent lineup for TAM6 is due very shortly, and we’ve landed – as usual – some brilliant talent to attract you. TAM5.5 is still signing up folks from all over, and there’ll be some of the most astonishing magical talent there to confound you…

Happy Xmas, all, and have a wonderful 2008!






Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Technorati!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
Comments (43)Add Comment
...
written by rosie, December 28, 2007
The culvert-cabin story does illustrate that "psychics" - although devious - are not stupid. The weather was lousy, if the family had not found shelter they were likely dead. So we place them in a cabin, which - if they are later found alive - is probably close enough. And if they are found dead then they probably HAD found shelter but foolishly left it again. The "psychic" was unlucky in this case that the family survived to tell the true tale.
...
written by rosie, December 28, 2007
BTW, the Attenborough in "Attenborough in Paradise" is Sir David, not Sir Richard. Richard is an actor and director, his younger brother David is the naturalist.
...
written by Snazz, December 28, 2007
"Happy Xmas, all, and have a wonderful 2009!"
And to you as well! And if 2009 is good I'm sure this coming year of 2008 will be fine as well.
...
written by JimC, December 28, 2007
Sally Quinn wrote,
This resolution was as anti-American as anything Congress has ever passed. It disenfranchised and marginalized millions and millions of men and women, reducing them to second-class citizens.
This rhetoric is over the top. NOT ONE PERSON was "disenfranchised" by the resolution. And for goodness' sake, some of the 13 original states had established churches. Is this resolution is more anti-American than that? I don't think so.

Randi wrote,
...think about my contention that we’re already immersed in a full-blown theocracy…
I wasn't aware there were laws establishing a church or compelling universal church attendance or belief, or that anyone had been convicted in a court for violating those laws. Perhaps you could enlighten us. In absence of that and in response to your telling us to think, I've thought about it and I think that extraordinary claims such as "full-blown theocracy" require extraordinary evidence.

If you want to see an actual full-blown theocracy, travel to Saudi Arabia. Or wait 20 years and one of the European countries will be one. And it won't be a Christian theocracy. And it'll go way beyond the supposed "full-blown theocracy" in the US you ominously warn us against.

Am I saying anything less than an Islamic theocracy is okay? Absolutely not. All I'm saying is we must be vigilant, but we must have a bit of perspective, too.

To paraphrase Tom Wolfe (who was paraphrasing Jean-François Revel), the dark night of theocracy is always supposedly descending in the United States and yet is actually landing in lots of other places.
...
written by paint3d, December 28, 2007
I can't believe that you would start a section praising logic and reason with a statement such as this:

"The only benefit to the existence of Uri Geller is that his body acts as a natural carbon sink. Thanks Uri. Because of you, global warming is slightly slower than it otherwise would be."

I was unaware that the CO2/1-degree rise in mean global surface temperature connection was proven fact. I was also laboring under the delusion, I suppose, that we are all carbon EMMITTERS, through exhalation.

...
written by prettyblossom, December 28, 2007
Regarding the Tools Of Wellness site - I've broused a little in their site and saw all the medical devices and medicines they're offering. Since none of those things looks like it is based on any clinical trials (unlike what they are claiming), I wanted to know how the FDA can approve such things. I checked their disclaimer: http://www.toolsforwellness.com/copyright.html and found out that "TOOLS FOR EXPLORATION, INC. DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION ACCESSIBLE VIA THIS SITE IS ACCURATE, COMPLETE OR CURRENT."
Furthermore, not one of those products are FDA approved, and those things are not to be used as medicines or medical devices. Then there's a long rant about how the company is in no way responsible to the use of their products, and one must not rely on them for anything real. Honestly - what's the point of buying these things in the first place if you can't get results from them?
I had a discussion with a pharmacist yesterday about the public uses of placebos - he claimed that it's illegal to sell placebo and the only use for it is in clinical trials. Boy, is he wrong...
...
written by DrMatt, December 28, 2007
I think Chris Comer should sue the state of Texas and Commissioner Paredes in federal court for using their ability to fire her from her former post as state science curriculum director to censor her from mentioning an upcoming lecture on real biology, and thus to chill all free speech on real biology, even as the legislature prepares to escort Discovery Institute into their science advisory in blatant violation of the first amendment. Texas has repeatedly voted down anti-SLAPP legislation at the state level, so the federal level (1st and 14th amendments) ought to be appropriate venue and Comer clearly has standing, as far as I know.

The whole situation in Texas is reminiscient of the Indiana state legislature's 1897 serious consideration of legislature setting the value of pi (see http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_341.html). But nobody was fired for merely mentioning a lecture by a real mathematician.
...
written by paint3d, December 28, 2007
You shouldn't have "corrected" the reference to 2009, you were right the first time. 2008 will not exist; it's the Gregorian calendar, every 400 years we skip a year ending in -08. It's to ensure that the vernal equinox will still occur on February 30.

Have a good 2009, everybody!
...
written by DeanR, December 28, 2007
You can always count on a number of Christmas miracle stories in the media at this time of year as they take a rather ordinary occurrence and pander to the religious by hailing it as a miracle.

The most egregious in our local news: a man has a heart attack during midnight mass at a local Catholic church. By a "miracle" another attendee knows CPR and saves the man's life. Of course, they bolster the "miracle" by having the guy tell us he wasn't going to go to mass because he was tired, but his brother bugged him until he relented and went.

Some frickin' miracle. Of course my mother-in-law, a rabidly religious woman who happens to be at our house for Christmas, was nodding and of course believing that it was some divine intervention. The credulity of the religious is not just dumbfounding, but downright dangerous.

And regarding the "dowsing as community education" piece: our school board community education calendar has an entire page full of similar b.s. masquerading as educational courses. (All by the same instructor, of course.) To my shame, I haven't yet written to the school board to complain.
...
written by prettyblossom, December 28, 2007
to paint3d: that's not true - you can't skip a whole year in any calendar for any reason - part of a year - yes, even a couple of months, but a whole year? what would be the point? The equinox doesn't depend on the number of the year, it depends on the number of the month. The gregorian calendar has a 400 years cycle but that means that there is a leap year every 4 years except for once every 400 years where there isn't. Leap year has february the 30th - that's it.
...
written by fls, December 28, 2007
In regards to "Medical Mythology Addressed":

Please note that the holiday issue of the BMJ is not meant to be taken seriously. Instead, it is an opportunity for researchers to get a little silly (the office party isn't enough?). Those aren't actually real medical beliefs, but a series of old wives tales or urban myths. What isn't so clear to me, though, is how many of the people posting rapid responses are in on the joke. :)
...
written by Penguin88, December 28, 2007
Re:Finding Signifigance

I have personally met with Mr. Handler of the CBC. I was at the CBC to pitch a program about mass hysteria. Mr. Handler is visibly handicapped and before my visit with him he was on an extended medical leave as a result of a conditon or accident which he chose not to share with me. Mr. Handler is an intelligent honest man as far I could tell so I don't think he was trying to be deceitful in his story. What readers should know, is that his pain wracked sleep may just have been due to very natural causes, causes he may not have wanted to make public. I have no problem sharing this as his medical issues are not a secret.
...
written by KevinDW78, December 28, 2007
I am often astonished by what I perceive to be a gross misunderstanding of the Constitution. This phrase "seperation of church and state" has become emblazoned in our minds, but it does not exist. The text of the Third Amendmend simply states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

That is a far cry from "seperation of church and state". The Constitution simply says that the government cannot "establish" a religion. It does not say that the government cannot endorse a religion.

That being said, I in no way support religion, but I think it's important not to misconstrue what the Constitution does and does not say. Especially since I constantly hear the phrase "seperation of church and state" and I am sure there are many, many Americans out there who think those are the actual words that appear in the Bill of Rights.
...
written by The Hippy, December 28, 2007
Prettyblossom, February 30th? I think that is a mythical as skipping a year every 400 years :)

Also when I tried looking at the Tools for Wellness site I couldn't find the copper tube, it seems to have been taken down, leaving only the Mk1 version, which looks like a bit of steel mesh and costs less, probably just as effective though
...
written by Chris C., December 28, 2007
prettyblossom: Leap year has February 29. It would be a truly extraordinary year that had a February 30.

paint3d: "I was unaware that the CO2/1-degree rise in mean global surface temperature connection was proven fact. I was also laboring under the delusion, I suppose, that we are all carbon EMMITTERS, through exhalation."

"1-degree rise"? No, it's that CO2 levels historically correlate to higher mean global temperatures. That's not a "proven fact", it's a direct observation via both current temperature trends and analysis of data from ice cores, dendrochronology, etc. It's also a direct observation that CO2 traps heat.

And yes, you're deluded. We are not net carbon emitters. The CO2 we exhale is part of a carbon-neutral cycle where the carbon is first extracted from the atmosphere by plants which use part of it to make organic (i.e. carbon-based) compounds that form their structures. The plants are consumed either by us directly or by animals we then eat. Both us and the animals emit part of that carbon as we exhale, but the rest of it goes into our own bodies which are also made primarily of organic compounds. The net carbon that remains in our bodies is sequestered from the atmosphere while we're alive, and a good portion of it may be after we're dead depending on how our bodies are disposed of. And then there's the carbon in the undigested part of our food. Solid human waste is not burned for fuel in Western countries, so that carbon is generally put back into the ground as well, as is that from livestock where it's used for fertilizer.

Of course, some carbon-containing gases are worse than others for a greenhouse effect, which is why everyone worries about cow flatulence more than cow respiration. The EPA says methane is 20 times more effective at trapping heat than CO2.

Either way, it's a silly critique of what was obviously a jocular post. You'll find life is more pleasant when you develop a sense of humor.

On the "Tools for Wellness" site, I see no reason to single out their magical copper pipe. (Would I be wrong in thinking it's just pipe from the Home Depot done up in the usual woo trappings?) On the very first page they feature the $230 "Titanium Cuff Shuzi EMF Bracelet", "Shuzi" apparently being yet another "personal energy system". Heaven knows we could always use more protection from that nasty EMF! When I was a schoolboy that stood for "electromotive force", the quantity measured in Volts. Now I guess it stands for "electromagnetic fields", which we are told is a "harmful emission". It seems the manufacturer is mainly known for its "Meridian Stress Assessment" devices, so we know exactly how reliable their science can be!

They also sell tuning forks. Not for tuning musical instruments, but apparently because just tapping a couple of them brings you "harmonic balance". Wonder of wonders!

Every time I look at it, it gets worse, so I think I'll stop here.
...
written by Alencon, December 28, 2007
Dear KevinDW78,

While you are correct about what the Constitution actually says, over the last 200 years, the Constitution has undergone signifcant interpretation by the Supreme Court as to what things like the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment mean.

Allow me to refer you to Wallace v. Jaffree in 1985 (summary courtesy of the Bill of Rights Institute).

Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)
An Alabama law setting aside a moment for “voluntary prayer” and allowing teachers to lead “willing students” in a prayer to “Almighty God . . . the Creator and Supreme Judge of the world” in public schools was struck down. The law had no secular purpose and endorsed religion, violating the Establishment Clause.

Note that the government cannot even endorse religion in general, never mind a specific religion like Christianity as was done in the House Resolution.

Whether you agree with the Constitution as a living document or not, the judicial history of the country has been to treat it as an ever evolving set of general principles so how it has been interpreted is at least as important as what it says.
...
written by Alencon, December 28, 2007
A brief comment on the idea of "other Gods out there."

Sorry, but this isn't a new discovery. Allow me to refer you to Mark S. Smith's "The Early History of God" which proposes the development of the cult of Yahweh from one god among a pantheon of worshipped Canaanite gods headed by El, to the monoidolatry of Yahweh (whose primary competition Smith believes was the harvest god Baal) and finally to monotheism which denies the existence of other gods.

Smith, if I recall correctly, even believes that Yahweh had a consort at one time. Anyone familier with the Bible is familiar with Asherah poles as a symbol of false gods. Well, the theory goes that originally these poles were a tribute to God's wife, the goddess Asherah.

Note that I am NOT pushing these theories as fact, just noting that they exist.
...
written by Diverted Chrome, December 28, 2007
H.R. 847:
Relax. The House approves hundreds of recognition resolutions every year. H.R. 635, for example, recognized Muslims and, specifically, Ramadan. It's not a bill that goes from there to the Senate on the way to becoming law, so don't knee-jerk so hard you upset the keyboard. Just keep an observed and informed eye and hope it doesn't cause any bigotry. Congress shall make no law...
...
written by williamebil, December 28, 2007
In Teller's production, was the play referred to by name, or was the traditional circumlocution used among the cast and crew? Was he actually able to overcome the superstitions of actors? If so, maybe Teller should apply for the million dollar prize...
...
written by Bishop takes pawn, December 29, 2007
I'm relieved to read Diverted Chrome's message on H.R. 847. From the article, and Randi's introduction to it, it seemed a dismal situation, but I had an understanding that resolutions are no big deal. I think they passed a resolution once that the real inventor of the telephone is Antonio Meucci but kids are still learning that it was good ol' A.G. Bell.

I'm a little disturbed though by JimC's statement that in 20 years a European country will be a theocracy. I wish you could have elaborated on which one it might be and why you think this is the case. It's pretty sad if it does happen because I thought that Europe, particularly west Europe was becoming more secular.
...
written by Skemono, December 29, 2007
I am often astonished by what I perceive to be a gross misunderstanding of the Constitution. This phrase "seperation of church and state" has become emblazoned in our minds, but it does not exist. The text of the Third Amendmend simply states:
Ahem. That would be the first amendment, not the third.

And no, it is not a "gross misunderstanding of the Constitution" to recognize that the first amendment does more than just prevent the government from establishing a national religion. It's well-established jurisprudence and found in several Supreme Court decisions. Or does the Supreme Court also misunderstand the Constitution?

Relax. The House approves hundreds of recognition resolutions every year. H.R. 635, for example, recognized Muslims and, specifically, Ramadan.
Sigh. To quote from the Sally Quinn article:
Earlier this year the House also passed resolutions honoring Islamic and Indian holidays but nothing that so equated a single faith with America and Americans.
The problem is not that they passed a resolution honoring Christmas. It's all the fluff about Christmas and Christianity being so damn important to the country that's a problem.
...
written by Skemono, December 29, 2007
Gah. Sorry about that, forgot this place doesn't accept HTML formatting. Here's what I meant to write:
I am often astonished by what I perceive to be a gross misunderstanding of the Constitution. This phrase "seperation of church and state" has become emblazoned in our minds, but it does not exist. The text of the Third Amendmend simply states:

Ahem. That would be the first amendment, not the third.

And no, it is not a "gross misunderstanding of the Constitution" to recognize that the first amendment does more than just prevent the government from establishing a national religion. It's well-established jurisprudence and found in several Supreme Court decisions. Or does the Supreme Court also misunderstand the Constitution?

Relax. The House approves hundreds of recognition resolutions every year. H.R. 635, for example, recognized Muslims and, specifically, Ramadan.

Sigh. To quote from the Sally Quinn article:
Earlier this year the House also passed resolutions honoring Islamic and Indian holidays but nothing that so equated a single faith with America and Americans.

The problem is not that they passed a resolution honoring Christmas. It's all the fluff about Christmas and Christianity being so damn important to the country that's a problem.
...
written by shadron, December 29, 2007
Let's get this right. In the American version of the Gregorian calendar, there is a leap day every four years, unless the year number is evenly divisible by 100, but if it is evenly divisible by 400, then there is such a day as well. This approximation for defining the ratio of the number of solar days in a solar year will be good until somewhere about 4000 CE, when another day will have to be added due to accumulated errors. This formula yields a value of 365.2422 days in a tear, which is pretty close to the currently observed value of 365.24219. There are even closer schemes; see http://pumas.jpl.nasa.gov/PDF_...1_97_1.pdf
...
written by shadron, December 29, 2007
paint3d seems to be batting in the low digits today:

"I was also laboring under the delusion, I suppose, that we are all carbon EMMITTERS, through exhalation."

I suppose that says something about the sloppiness of our thinking, or expressing our thoughts. A human being is not an emitter of carbon, but an emitter of carbon dioxide. We take carbon in as a component of our food and emit some of it in the air we exhale as a result of our internal "burning" of part of our food. We are actually a temporary net sink for carbon (not CO2), in that, as a component of nearly all organic compounds, we have a lot of in it our bodies, and that carbon is sequestered away from becoming the infamous greenhouse gas until our body decays or is burned at the end of our sojourn.

So, in a temporary way, the writer of the squib paint3d objects to is right. He didn't say that we all are such a sink, but then if Uri weren't among us we would be poorer by one more such temporary carbon sink. I think the fineness of the distinction is telling.
...
written by Didaktylos, December 29, 2007
Further to the "other gods out there item". I've heard the suggestion that the priests of Yahweh went monotheistic as a way of staying in business after the collapse of the kingdom - allowing your people to be conquered is a sacking offense for any god.
...
written by cic, December 29, 2007
In reference to "Do This"

Sieg heil! er, oops, I mean, praise the Lord! or is there much difference .....
...
written by cic, December 29, 2007

Separation of church and state is found in Article 6 Section 3 of this secular republic's constitution.

"but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

That constitutional prohibition against requiring a religious belief to be a qualification to serve in the government requires a separation of church from state.

The concept is found again in the first amendment which contains two clauses governing church and state separation: the Establishment Clause, that guarantees the separation of religion and the government, and the Free Exercise Clause, which prohibits the government from interfering with people's right to worship as they choose. These two principles protect our freedom to practice any religion, or no religion at all.

Anyone with access to an online search engine can find a number of Supreme Court decisions upholding the concept of separation of church and state in this republic that Thomas Jefferson explained and justified in his letter of August 2, 1803 to the Dansbury Baptist Association.

"Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society." Thomas Jefferson

Perhaps the only reason our founders didn't put that specific language, separation of church and state in the republic's constitution is because they saw no need to given the language of Article 6, and the First Amendment.

Had they foreseen the problems we are faced today with the assault by what I refer to as the "Religious Reich" who are trying to subvert this secular republic and its religious freedoms of and from religion for all into a Fundamentalist Evangelical Born-again Christian Nation founded on biblical principles, none of which have ever been presented, they'd have specifically included the words "separation of church and state" in the language of the secular constitution of this secular, representative republic.
...
written by brandon_se, December 29, 2007
Hello Randi before the New year end. I have something to show you. Please email me at Brandon_se@yahoo.com I dont know what it is and its a video you make the decision. I want the world to see and judge it for their own. I know every time. I show the video to my friends. I not see them around me for a period of time. But they soon will come back. Even talking about it. I film it on my webcam going to bed. I want you to contact me and see it for your self fly here. I dont know what is the force or what it is but its in my room. I am a security guard and electrician. I complete 2 years of IEC apprenticeship. I just want the world to see what is this. I post this on your Youtube comment text please contact me. I just know that the other side maybe not want this out.
...
written by brandon_se, December 29, 2007
The file is uncompress one gigabyte. I like to show you the video beside me and you get the feeling in my room. As I talk to you. About it. I dont want no signature or application or anything just look at it. At least I can show it to the people that are still alive now and I still feel sorry I did not show it earlier to those that pass away yesterday or earlier in life that would like to see it in their life time. I check my email contact me.
...
written by Lubab, December 29, 2007
I think Randi would have been well served to follow the advice he gave to Ms. Turcio concerning validating claims. He quotes Avital Pilpel who makes several factual errors starting with his misquoting of the Bible.
The original Hebrew says, "Lo ihyu lachem..."
The original Hebrew actually states, "Lo yihye lecha", oddly enough, Pilpel changes both words from the singular form, to the plural of "yihyu lachem.”
It is an Hebrew idiom, meaning "in preference to me." It is often used elsewhere in the Bible in matrimonial matters
The words "al panay" occur just 12 times in the Bible. None of those can possibly be interpreted as 'in preference to' (as Pilpul claims it does in the two instances the Bible mentions the 10 commandments), and none of those are used in reference to matrimonial matters. If, as I suspect, Mr. Pilpel is referring to the similar yet far more common 'al penay' he is ignoring the obvious grammatical differences which I won't enter into here. That form occurs 123 times in the bible. Out of those, in only in only one instances can it be construed the way Mr. Pilpel tries to portray its meaning as in his hasty generalization - that being Deuteronomy 21:15 where the Bible deals with the laws of inheritance. The other times, it is translated variably as; on the face of, upon, facing, on top of, in the presence of, or before - all of which are quite similar in meaning. I should point out that when translated as before, its usage is similar to "a servant standing before a king" not in the sense of one person finishing a race before another, as Randi, and Roessler mistakenly understood in last weeks SWIFT. It is quite clear that Pilpel is cherry-picking in an attempt to validate his own preconceived explanation of the verse particular verse. It appears nowhere else in the bible with that interpretation, and certainly not in the context of any matrimonial matters.
i.e., when someone divorces one wife and marries another al paneyha – "over her face" – that is, in preference to her.
The words "al paneyha" appear in just three places in the Bible (1 Samuel 25:23; 2 Kings 21:13; Ruth 2:10). In none of those cases does it does it appear in the context that Pilpel claims it does, and in each case it is translated literally as 'on her face' or 'on its face' and cannot possibly be interpreted as meaning, 'in preference to'.
There is no implication in those parts of the Bible that other gods do not exist, or that Jehovah is necessarily the most powerful God of some pantheon

If I hadn't spent the last half hour trying to locate his previously concocted Bible references I would have spent it finding references disproving these statements- the first of which I disagree with (see for example just one chapter before the 10 commandments, Deuteronomy 4:35 - …Lord He is God; there is none else besides Him. And four verses later 4:39 - …that the Lord He is God in heaven above, and upon the earth below; there is none else.), and the second of his claims which is self-evident gibberish to anyone well-versed in the Bible.
The Jews only became monotheistic, for complicated reasons, long after these parts of the Bible were written.
Whenever any another god is mentioned in the Bible, it is mentioned as a FALSE god, who cannot defend or help its followers. Nowhere in the Bible is there a reference to any other god doing anything, or with any powers whatsoever. It seems people are confusing the 'real' God, when He contrasts himself to the fake god’s. I haven’t seen any Biblical much less historical evidence to the claim of henotheism, and it may just be a idea of modern Bible criticism or revisionism.
Okay, and I see that this comment only supports even more my contention that there is nothing in the Bible that says the God they endorse and so admire, is the only deity…! Is this a “find,” or what?

I find it strange that Randi, who believes that the burden of proof is on the believer to proof that God exists (a position I agree with), should suddenly make a full reversal and assume that the ancients Israelites believed in many God's instead of one and the burden of proof rests with those who assume fewer God's. William of Ockham may well disagree with Randi here. Maimonides for example, says that belief in one God is not only the basis of Judaism, but is to be accepted on rational grounds, not simply as a matter of belief.
In short, I think Randi should continue his good work of debunking pseudoscience and leave Biblical criticism and exegesis to those well-versed in both the historical and linguistic nature of the book.
...
written by Lubavitcher, December 29, 2007
I apologize for the length of my previous comment. Good thing I left out some other criticisms.
...
written by Paul Erickson, December 29, 2007
Regarding Veronica in the Saccharin Soothe:

Times are a changin’. Remember when fruitcakes like this were in padded cells? Now, they are making money off of other nutcases.
...
written by mjl, December 29, 2007
It's sad that Bergman has forgotten how to pronounce his name in heaven. So I guess US cultural imperialism is not a mere worldly matter :/
...
written by TomFoss, December 30, 2007
"“Veronica” – not her favorite name, as she says,"

Someone has listened to a little too much Elvis Costello, methinks.
...
written by popsaw, December 30, 2007
Randi said happy Xmas at the end of this weeks commentary.I wonder if he celebrates or is he just being polite?
...
written by Cheerful Dragon, December 31, 2007
Randi said happy Xmas at the end of this weeks commentary.I wonder if he celebrates or is he just being polite?


I'm an atheist, my mum's a agnostic. Mum goes to church because that's all that's available to her. I haven't been to church since my mum-in-law's funeral last year. We both 'celebrate' Christmas in our own way. Maybe Randi was just being polite, but atheism doesn't prevent non-believers putting up the tree, handing out presents, etc.
...
written by KevinDW78, December 31, 2007
Ahem. That would be the first amendment, not the third.


You are correct. I made the error of citing "Article III" of the Bill of Rights and calling it the third amendment.

Thie Third Amendment states that:
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.


Personally, I think the Third Amendment is the most important. Have you ever had a soldier stay in your house? I'll be damned if they EVER put the toilet seat down!
...
written by umlteacher, January 02, 2008
how about interpreting the bad back the other way around?
His back was busy sending out a bunch of negative energy that killed his grandfather?
...
written by Mrs. Maintenance, January 03, 2008
Damn! If only I hadn't turned in those copper pipes at the scrap yard! I had no idea they'd protect me from negative vibes! And I had about six of them! That's a lot of protection, down the drain! :P
...
written by rdmiller3, January 03, 2008
About Mr. Handler in "Finding Significance"...

One of the harmful effects of believing in woo-woo is that it can lead a person to harm.

Mr. Handler should probably see a doctor about that wracking pain... but if he really thinks it was a mystical experience, he probably won't. We may later discover the cause of his pain in the obituaries.
...
written by Dave Henderson, January 04, 2008
RE: Randi's comment on the woo woo rod.... "No dangerous....earth fault lines"? Earthquake zones, anyone? Dunno how a piece of water-pipe would protect you, though!
...
written by Carbonunit, January 07, 2008
Just an idea for Jim Boskus, concerning the dowsing course being offered at his local school board,if you have the time, take the course, sit patiently through what ever you can stomach then ask questions, ask for proof, offer your own opinions, pose as much doubt as possible and poke him with a stick at every turn. You may not be the class favourite but perhaps you will spark some doubt in some students mind and you will make it uncomfortable for this quack instructor. He may not have had challenges from his students very often.
...
written by Steel Rat, January 17, 2008
"1-degree rise"? No, it's that CO2 levels historically correlate to higher mean global temperatures. That's not a "proven fact", it's a direct observation via both current temperature trends and analysis of data from ice cores, dendrochronology, etc. It's also a direct observation that CO2 traps heat.


Correlation, but not causation. CO2 rises as a result of temperature increases. That's exactly what the ice cores show. Dendrochronology is rife with errors, because tree ring widths are the result of much more than just temperature.

CO2's ability to "trap heat" (