People

Sylvia Browne

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Featured Item

Tyson - The Sky is Not the Limit
Tyson - The Sky is Not the Limit

Add to Cart

Begley - Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain
Begley - Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain

Add to Cart

Events Calendar

« < July 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
SWIFT February 1, 2008 Print E-mail
Written by James Randi   
Thursday, 31 January 2008
Table of Contents
  1. More Superstition in High Places

  2. In Australia Too

  3. Hidden Motives

  4. I’m Properly Scolded

  5. Snap It Up!

  6. Psychic Well Busted

  7. Crisis For Quackery

  8. It’s Certainly Remote

  9. More Tiresome Details

  10. We’re Blocked

  11. Please Define “Crackpot”

  12. Starbuck Wisdom

  13. In Conclusion…



MORE SUPERSTITION IN HIGH PLACES

pic

Reader Adam Beach, in New Zealand, reports:

I just thought you and your readers might find this interesting, recently our country has had an unusually large number of brutal murders and attacks, which has made the politicians whip up into a frenzy, as it makes for good issues to gain votes on. However, some have some rather silly explanations. Here is an excerpt from one of the local papers:

Police Minister Annette King yesterday visited the scene of the shoot-out in Flat Bush, south Auckland. She said the hot summer and full moon were to blame for the recent "unusual events" that had created mad January in south Auckland.

"It's well documented within the police – and we've had a long hot summer – and the view is that we often get things happen in this month that we wouldn't have happening in winter."

The rest of the article can be read here: tinyurl.com/yw449p. I find it sad to think that a government minister – especially one in charge of the police – can come to such a ludicrous conclusion. Luckily the ridicule is coming on quick and fast from all corners over this one.




IN AUSTRALIA TOO

Down Under, a similar situation is shaping up, to my great delight. “Complementary Medicine” in general is being questioned after the Australian federal government asked the National Drug Regulator to investigate claims that the present system is too lax. Senator Jan McLucas, Parliamentary Secretary to Health Minister Nicola Roxon, has asked the Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA] to provide an official response to data published in the Medical Journal of Australia outlining ways to tighten the rules that now apply to herbal and other alternative medicines. The “herbal” label has been used for decades to soften the identity of quack nostrums.

Claims made for weight-loss products, for example, often aren’t supported by the limited scientific evidence available. The Medical Journal is suggesting that medicine labels state whether they have been assessed for efficacy by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, that complaint procedures and penalties for inappropriate or misleading advertising be simplified and strengthened, and that the TGA to do better checking of the composition of herbal products and the claims made for them.

These proposals have of course infuriated the Alternative Medicines industry.

Queensland scientist Loretta Marron, one of the co-authors on the Medical Journal paper, won the Skeptic of the Year award from the Australian Skeptics last year in recognition of her work to debunk bogus medical claims. This government is clearly more interested in these ideas than its predecessor was.




HIDDEN MOTIVES

An anonymous reader tells us:

In 2000 I was working for CNN International, and we received an offer from the Hong Kong tourist board to do a feature on the island of Cheung Chau – a small island popular with windsurfers, vacationers and Hong Kong businessmen with mistresses who liked to take a room for the weekend. We accepted the offer and were flown in Business on Cathay Pacific and given guides, luxury rooms etc., etc., presuming that the HK Tourist Board were simply keen on promoting destinations that were less-well-known internationally than HK Island and Kowloon.

Chatting with locals on Cheung Chau we soon discovered the real reason the Tourist Board were so keen to promote the island...

It transpired that businessmen had stopped using the island for illicit affairs, and instead had turned to using the weekend rental rooms as venues for suicide. The typical HK apartment kitchen contains a large indoor gas BBQ rather than a conventional oven, and large numbers of troubled workers had taken to renting a room for the weekend, turning on the gas and letting nature take its course. This convenient technique had been enticing increasing numbers of gloomy workers with the end in sight, to the island.

Suicides, in Chinese tradition, always come back as unpleasant ghosts, and Cheung Chau had now, as we discovered, become an island full of vengeful, unhappy spirits wandering the roads, tracks and beaches – with calamitous effects on the local tourist industry – after all, you don't want your valuable week off work turning into an episode of Scooby Doo. Thus the Tourist Board had stepped in and lured us in to do a happy, cheery half hour puff-piece with one of our best known local anchors on the happier side of Hong Kong's Haunted Island!

You mean to tell us that money and superstition were behind all this? Who would have believed that…?




I’M PROPERLY SCOLDED

I erred last week when giving my example of how science accepts new ideas and constructs. See randi.org/joom/content/view/151/27/#i1. Several readers pointed out the error, and Rick Ward in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, provided me with the most comprehensive outline of the facts:

You write "Relativity itself was subsequently relegated when quantum theory emerged…" Not at all, Mr. Randi. Relativity and quantum theory are two of the three best attested, most successful scientific theories we have (the third of course is evolution). Relativity and quantum theory generally deal with very different things, and within their limits they have proven to be extraordinarily accurate and have passed every test anyone's been able to think of. The difficulty is that they're fundamentally inconsistent and thus cannot both be true, but it's only when they come together under very extreme conditions, such as in the core of a black hole or in the first tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang, that they break down, and give results akin to dividing by zero.

Some version of “string theory” may or may not resolve this, the jury's still out on that. But while neither is "true" in any absolute sense, and science would not make such a claim anyway, they're close enough to whatever the truth actually is to be useful. GPS satellites, for instance, require relativistic corrections to their synchronization signals, and the computer I'm using to compose this depends on quantum effects for its operation. There's at least one more layer of reality that subsumes them both that we haven't figured out yet, but both are flourishing in practical, useful ways in the real world. I'm inclined to think there are many more layers, that reality is in some sense fractal, but that's another long digression. In the meantime though, it is simply not correct to suggest that quantum theory has in any sense relegated relativity.

Again, my admittedly limited knowledge has surfaced. I thank Mr. Ward and others for this richly due comeuppance…! However, I expect that science-bashers might choose to use this perceived Uncertainty of Science to crow over, as they often do. Au contraire; this is a further example of the way that science accepts what works, uses it, and makes attempts to reconcile seemingly disparate and conflicting ideas and theories, rather than falling back on dogma or “authority.”

In any case, touché!




SNAP IT UP!

No more incredible than other religious appeals and/or sales pitches, this is one forwarded to me by some automated spam agency. Peter Popoff, with his Holy Water and Manna story, or the Golden Plates of the Mormons, are just as irrational. It appears that Islam has embraced Apple, since two critical elements in the faith are determining exactly when prayers are offered up, and in what direction:

FREE iAthan Software for iPhones and iPod Touch!

Get Prayer Times for millions of cities!

In the Name of Allah. The wait is over. Guided Ways brings you iAthan for iPhones and iPod Touch. A native application that gives you Prayer Timings, Athan and Qibla direction for thousands of cities world wide. The design of the software has been based on our popular Prayer Times for Mobiles software, which has been loved and welcomed by many. This is an initial Beta release and so your feedback would be highly welcomed as it would allow us to improve the software. Come and download the software for FREE.

Athan and Qibla translate as, “time and direction.” Wouldn’t want prayers going off somewhere into space or at the wrong time! Back to the directions:

LET OTHERS KNOW

All these efforts are of no use if they aren't being utilized. Help Us. Help Islam and Help Yourselves – Spread the Word and Earn Ajr from The Most Merciful, the Oft-Forgiving Lord of the Worlds. If you know brothers and sisters who would like to have this software on their iPhones, please forward the message on.

... "Our Lord! We have indeed believed, so forgive us our sins and save us from the punishment of the Fire." [3:16]

I’ve no notion what “Ajr” is, and I’m sure some reader will tell me, but I’m really amused by the “millions of cities” reference. What cities? Are we covering the Milky Way here? Is every bedroom or broom-closet considered to be a city…? I can guess what the “punishment of the Fire” is, and I’ll try to avoid it, but now I discover that maybe Allah isn’t quite as munificent as I’d been led to believe, when he’s referred to above as, “the Oft-Forgiving Lord of the Worlds.” How often is “oft” and what are the criteria for deciding…?

Such heavy theological matters have me quite bewildered…




PSYCHIC WELL BUSTED

pic

Reader Jeremy Belch alerts us to this welcome and encouraging news item.

I've been reading and enjoying your SWIFT newsletter for a few years, and would like to thank you for the work that you do. As a medical student who is also interested in the field of public health, I am especially grateful for your efforts to raise awareness of healthcare quackery, as this sort of woo-woo has greater potential to harm people in more than just their wallet than other nonsense.

I came across this Australian broadcast – youtube.com/watch?v=VG-DV4ottmE – and was unsure if you'd seen it. I thought that any exposé that revealed woo-woo fraud would be a good thing, but I find it both amusing and disturbing that they call in another, "legitimate" psychic as a witness.

Yes, the “legitimate” psychic is that old scam artist Simon Turnbull, who I’ve run into previously, several times. I must admit that Turnbull is certainly as legitimate and accurate as any other psychic I’ve ever met…




CRISIS FOR QUACKERY

The UK Independent newspaper ended a recent article on homeopathy with a statement with which I’ll begin this item:

The Prince of Wales and the Queen are known to be supporters of homeopathy.

That should set the stage. It appears that homeopathy has begun to be recognized in the UK for the useless frippery it has always been, judging from the fact that the National Health Services [NHS] are now dropping homeopathic treatments, following serious debate about whether they actually work. Nearly two years ago, a list of eminent doctors put their names to a letter urging the NHS to stop funding the treatment. See randi.org/jr/2007-08/082407newton.html#i5 for the earlier indications in SWIFT of this awakening.

pic

Presently, only 49 of the 132 primary care trusts still include homeopathic services in their lists of services, and more than a quarter of them have stopped or reduced funding on these in the past two years. Now, the official journal of the UK’s General Practitioners, Pulse, says that homeopathic clinics in the UK "are in crisis." The Royal London Homeopathic Hospital [RLHH], for example, is fighting for survival after eight trusts cancelled contracts over the past year and six more reduced referrals, which are said to be down about 20% in the past year. Dr. Peter Fisher, the clinical director of the RLHH, says he is confident that his hospital will survive. He said that there's a lot of public and political support for homeopathy, which he says comprises only 40% of the services that the hospital offers, including nutritional medicine and relaxation techniques.

Richard Hoey, deputy editor of Pulse, said:

Homeopathy is a highly controversial treatment with all sorts of doubts over its evidence base, but it is popular with patients and has traditionally always had a place in general practice. If the NHS is now going to stop providing homeopathy, that needs to be a decision taken in the full glare of public debate, and not made in the committee rooms of cash-strapped trusts.

It’s about time. Blood-letting, based on medieval notions of how the human body works – or doesn’t work – has long since been abandoned as a valid method of treating patients, though for centuries it was a standard procedure with physicians. Homeopathy is based upon similarly erroneous and unproven notions that have not gone away with the other witchcraft, and it’s time that medical science tossed it out, too.

A “Natural HealthCare Council,” set up to examine the matter of homeopathy, will begin work in April.

Dr. Michael Baum, a professor emeritus of surgery, welcomed the news that funding was being cut. He commented:

The NHS should be putting its money into evidence-based medicine, so this is a good start… But while people are starting to realize they are being conned by the whole complementary medicine establishment, it will be a long time before we see the back of it.




IT’S CERTAINLY REMOTE

banachek

From UK friend Ian Rowland – author of the definitive book, “The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading,” 4th edition – we’ve received a good example of the Desperate Move maneuver so favored by media flunkies who cannot find a sensational item to fluff up an otherwise drab day. Says Ian, the Daily Mail

…once again serves up the psychic woo-woo, as it has done consistently for decades: tinyurl.com/339l69.

Michael Weber [a prominent magician/skeptic] calls this “rebunking.” No matter how many times the claims get debunked, no matter how often the claims get dissected, one newspaper article (read by millions) comes along and takes us right back to the 1970s. “Rebunking” indeed. This one short article manages to revive several corpses all at once by stating that:

- remote viewing works!

- they’ve proved it beyond all doubt – no fluke, no fraud!

- Brian Josephson believes it, and he’s a proper scientist!

- the military have funded research/used it!

- Nella Jones is a successful psychic detective!

- Joe McMoneagle has demonstrated RV under test conditions!

And so on. One can blame the journalists or the editors, but they would say “We only write it/publish it because readers read it.”

It was in the paper. It must be true.

We share your dismay, Ian. I ask our readers to refer to previous SWIFT mentions of “remote viewing,” “Brian Josephson,” and “Joe McMoneagle” to see the validity of their claims, and Nella Jones was definitively tested on my Granada TV series, and definitively failed. The media – at least as exemplified here by the Daily Mail – fails all tests of integrity.




MORE TIRESOME DETAILS

pic

As yet another hint on why we’re discontinuing the JREF million-dollar challenge, I offer here a statement from a teacher, Stephen E. Braude, who is a touring instructor in woo-woo. Quoting Braude:

The Randi challenge is a sham. He sets it up in advance so that he can't lose, and sometimes he uses lame excuses for not accepting challenges that would be too tough. See www.skepticalinvestigations.org for general discussions of dishonest or incompetent attacks by so-called skeptics, and for material on Randi in particular, www.skepticalinvestigations.org/whoswho, www.skepticalinvestigations.org/exam/Prescott_Randi.htm, www.skepticalinvestigations.org/controversies/Auerbach_Randi.htm, and www.skepticalinvestigations.org/whoswho/Randi_dogs.htm. That should get you started.

Only two of the urls above refer to the million dollar prize, expressing concern about the availability of the prize, since it’s in the form of “bonds,” and the site offers a ridiculous explanation of what bonds are all about. I informed them that the Goldman/Sachs Prize Account is always maintained at the level of at least one million dollars in Treasury Bond investment, and the current statement – as of this moment – puts it at $1,091,570.70. I referred them to the latest printed statement at randi.org/joom/content/view/151/27/#i5, and told them:

These bonds are not junk, or capricious in any way. We keep the prize money in earning bonds so that it makes sufficient interest for us. Otherwise, we would not have the 60 to 80 thousand dollars annually that it generates. The bonds can be converted into cash within hours of initiating that transaction. I trust that you will publish this fact on your site…?

It remains to be seen whether their readers will be enlightened in this matter. And, I here challenge Braude to provide evidence that – as he claims – (a) we set up the protocol in advance so that we can't lose, and (2) that we use lame excuses for not accepting challenges that we think would be too tough for us. These two statements of his imply that there have been more than one example of each, but we’ll be generous and accept just one of each. Please provide this information, Mr. Braude.

Hello, Braude? You there…?




WE’RE BLOCKED

Reader Jorge Mota provides an example of the rocky road we skeptics have to travel:

I tried to access your site today from my hospital, as I do every Friday. Here is what my PC answered to me:

Access Forbidden. Access to URL: http://www.randi.org/ Has been blocked.

Reason: Site is listed in the forbidden category: Entertainment/Recreation/Hobbies.

Computer Associates
eTrust SCM for HTTP

 

This is nice, huh? I need to wait 'til I get home to read today's article. Also, I was visiting sites about electroconvulsive therapy (my field of work) and the access to many sites was blocked because they were "political sites." So much for "Information Highway" and "Information Technology." And they protest that people are dumber every day!

This reminds me that our site has been automatically blocked by several different “editing” systems, since words like “psychic” and “occult” show up so often. If you use any school or library Internet access, and find this to be the case, please notify us, will you? Thanks.




PLEASE DEFINE “CRACKPOT”

Reader Rich Gray in Dayton, Ohio, reports:

The SciFi Channel's Ghost Hunters have been invited to inspect buildings at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base here in Dayton, Ohio. Apparently some lady working in the PR office (of all places!) has been hearing years of reports of apparitions and strange sounds and decided to do something about it. She contacted the Ghost Hunters and invited them to the base. They are going to be here for a week starting tomorrow, "investigating" the reported hauntings and of course, taping new episode(s). Amazingly, someone at the Pentagon signed off on this!

This is so very sad. Dayton is the home of aviation. The Wright brothers perfected flight on land that is now WPAFB. A lot of leading edge technology is developed at WPAFB. The Air Force Institute of Technology is there. Why is the US Air Force aiding and abetting this idiocy? Maybe next month they'll be inviting snake oil salesmen on base to discuss jet fuel additives?

pic Then the Dayton Daily News ran another front page article on the Ghost Hunters. The focus of this article was that it's hard for fans to meet the Ghost Hunters, but it also included what seem to me to demonstrate a lack of military intelligence:

Base Commander Col. Colleen Ryan told members of the Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce last week that reports of paranormal experiences on the base come from people she would not “regard as crackpots.”

I am profoundly disturbed that an Air Force base commander thinks that strange sightings on her base should be investigated by plumbers-turned-TV stars. Again, there was a complete lack of skepticism in the article. After the first article, I did call the 88th Air Base Wing Office of Public Affairs – wpafb.af.mil/units/pa/index.asp – and talked to Laura – the woman in the PR office who’d invited the GB there – complaining about the waste of taxpayers money guarding guests, and asking generally why the AF is stroking the gullible by bringing superstition/fraud to a place of high tech.

I suggested they get Joe Nickell if they really wanted these sightings investigated properly. Laura politely took my comments and said she'd pass them on to the event organizers. Yyyyeah, that will do a whole lot of good... I asked her to pass my comments up the chain of command. And we now see that's probably useless too... Nevertheless, I might take a shot at a phone call to the base commanders office.

One thing might be interesting. Being on a military base, the GH's will probably – better! – be under escort at all times. That will make funny business difficult.

The Dayton Daily News story can be found at tinyurl.com/3cet7a.




STARBUCK WISDOM

Reader Matthew Besson, in Alberta, Canada, tells us:

I picked up my usual cup of coffee at Starbucks on my way to work and I read the little quote on the side of the cup and thought of you. Here is what it said:

We will end poverty and stop HIV/AIDS within our generation when guided by African principles such as ubuntu that underscore our interconnectedness. With greater compassion for others, we would no longer accept hunger and disease as facts of life.

Cedza Dlamini (Youth Emissary)

Gee Whiz, I was kind of betting on science to help us out in these departments. Further, with all due respect to those with an acute sense of ubuntu, the suggestion that the researchers, scientists and aid organizations fighting these problems around the world lack compassion, or simply acquiesce in the face of hunger and disease, is silly if not insulting.

However, take heart. When I got to work I noticed a new product on our store shelves. It resembled a little voodoo doll or charm. The company had an insert inside that was careful to state that the dolls were:

...expressions of imagination, creativity and appreciation of anything cute. They are NOT for real and possess no curse effect whatsoever.

Not all is lost, I suppose.

Not all, Matthew…




IN CONCLUSION…

bell

TAM 5.5 was a resounding success, and we thank all our speakers for their sterling efforts. The Open House at the JREF that followed was fully attended, and we made a number of new friends there. And now TAM6 – June 19 to 22 – is looming on the skeptical horizon. Old friends such as Michael Shermer, Phil Plait, Richard Wiseman, and Christopher Hitchens, will be back in full force. Our keynote speaker will be the famous Neil deGrasse Tyson, who will make us sit up and pay attention, I guarantee. My old friend Arthur Benjamin – the mathemagician – will bust your brains. Workshops by both Banachek and Ben Radford will be featured, and of course Penn & Teller will tread the boards before us all.

Stay tuned for the other luminaries!

On Wednesday I’m off to Munich, Germany, to tape a comprehensive Geller exposé for “Welt der Wunder” – a program which promises to be rather strong. It’ll be circulated in the Netherlands, Cyprus, Hungary, and Australia, as well.

Busy, busy, busy…


Signature





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Technorati!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
Comments (42)Add Comment
...
written by Kimpatsu, February 01, 2008
Dear Amazing One, I think you'll find that the British tabloid with the naked Page 3 girls is the Sun, not the Daily Mail. The Mail is more interested, in the words of the Bad Scientist, in dividng absolutely everything in the world into two groups: those that cause, and those that cure, cancer.
http://www.badscience.net/
...
written by colin.davis4cg, February 01, 2008
Damn! Kimpatsu beat me to it! As the self-appointed voice of the respectable middle class, the Daily Mail would be most indignant at such a suggestion. As someone once said, the dangerous thing about the Mail is, its readers think it's a real newspaper.
...
written by rfurber, February 01, 2008
The Daily Mail defended Hitler and Mussolini in the 30s (right up until 1939). However, even though they've probably changed their editorial staff since then, it doesn't seem they've learnt their lesson.
...
written by rosie, February 01, 2008
Please, Mr Randi, for those of us in Germany, be sure to tell us when your show will air.
...
written by Marcus Hill, February 01, 2008
Having been beaten to the punch by my fellow brits on the correction about our shining tabloid press, I think it's only fair to point out that the Mail has actually shifted its political stance since defending Hitler and Mussolini. It now regards them as dangerous lefties.
...
written by Jeremy Henderson, February 01, 2008
Bit off topic, but it was announced this week that Montel Williams will be ending his show. Many are pointing to a recent rather confrontational appearance on Fox News, following which many Fox owned stations decided not to renew his show's syndication deal.

Curiously, I don't recall Sylvia Browne predicting this one...
...
written by Lt Dan, February 01, 2008
Just read the Prescott article for the first time (see the link from Braude above). Very entertaining. Anyone who hasn't read it should do so. Particularly amusing if one follows the link to Randi's rebuttal, and read the rest of Prescott's comments. The majority of the discussion centres on the Targ and Puthoff tests with Geller at SRI. Prescott's final comments, once his position has become increasingly beleauguered , are along the line of (and I paraphrase) "what happened all those years ago doesn't really matter anyway, the Ganzfield experiments have since proved the existence of ESP, so there!". Great stuff! Methinks, why doth he protest so much?
...
written by Dave Rattigan, February 01, 2008
I take issue with my fellow Canadian, Matthew Besson.

"We will end poverty and stop HIV/AIDS within our generation when guided by African principles such as ubuntu that underscore our interconnectedness. With greater compassion for others, we would no longer accept hunger and disease as facts of life."

I didn't see any suggestion in the quote of disrespect for scientists and researchers. Surely he was warning against sitting around on our lazy asses about AIDS and poverty, not having a dig at those who are already clearly putting into practice the compassion he talks about. And surely he wasn't suggesting compassion as a substitute for scientific research and practical solutions, but as a necessary motivation. After all, science and technology is worth nothing if there's no basic motivation to use it for the good of humanity.

Ending poverty and disease within a generation is obviously a bit of a naive prediction, but disagreeing with the general sentiment seems nit-picking to me. I liked the quote, and fancy putting ubuntu into practice in my own life a bit more often!
...
written by TDjazz, February 01, 2008
In the youtube video linked with the item "Psychic Well Busted," the news reader uses the phrase "phony psychic," the reporter uses the phrase "real psychic," and a woman who was conned says "genuine psychic" as if there are real and fake psychics. "Fake psychic" is redundant and the other terms are just wrong. Seems there is still a belief that psychism is real by using these terms. Psychism itself is a con--or a delusion for those who really believe in this "phony power."
...
written by ameliaf, February 01, 2008
Blood-letting, based on medieval notions of how the human body works – or doesn’t work – has long since been abandoned as a valid method of treating patients, though for centuries it was a standard procedure with physicians.


Well, almost completely, but for my disease, hemochromatosis (too much iron in the blood), phlebotomies are still the only real treatment, although they're investigating chelation as an alternative. I'm getting regular phlebotomies at the National Institute of Health in MD for the disease, and, surprisingly, it's harder than simply giving blood--there's a lot of fine tuning involved.

I wear a little pin when I go from a 16th century woodblock print: a young woman in a bloodletting session. :)
...
written by Db0, February 01, 2008
We will end poverty and stop HIV/AIDS within our generation when guided by African principles such as ubuntu that underscore our interconnectedness.

It is obvious that they are talking about the popular Operating system here which, given enough people joining in suitable projects like folding at home, will certainly help to end difficult diseases like AIDS & Alzheimer's and povertry (By being free) ;)
...
written by Beelzebubba, February 01, 2008
Always liked Blackadder's meeting with the quack leech doctor:

Edmund: Look, am I paying for this personal abuse or is it extra?

Doctor Leech: No, it's all part of the service. I think you're in luck though. An extraordinary new cure has just been developed for exactly this kind of sordid problem.

Edmund: It wouldn't have anything to do with leeches, would it?

Doctor Leech: I had no idea you were a medical man.

Edmund: Never had anything you doctors didn't try to cure with leeches. A leech on my ear for ear ache, a leech on my bottom for constipation.

Doctor Leech: They're marvelous, aren't they?

Edmund: Well, the bottom one wasn't. I just sat there and squashed it.

Doctor Leech: You know the leech comes to us on the highest authority?

Edmund: Yes. I know that. Dr. Hoffmann of Stuttgart, isn't it?

Doctor Leech: That's right, the great Hoffmann.

Edmund: Owner of the largest leech farm of Europe.

Doctor Leech: Yes. Well, I cannot spend all day gossiping. I'm a busy man. As far as this case is concerned I have now had time to think it over and I can strongly recommend a [in chorus] course of leeches.

Edmund: Yes. I 'll pop a couple down my codpiece before I go to bed.

Doctor Leech: No, no, no, no. Don't be ridiculous. This isn't the dark ages. Just pop four in your mouth in the morning and let them dissolve slowly. In a couple of weeks you 'll be beating your servant with a stick, just like the rest of us.

Edmund: You're a sick quack, aren't you?

Doctor Leech: I'd rather be a quack than a ducky. Good day.
...
written by Kess, February 01, 2008
As already pointed out, "The Sun" is the UK tabloid that features bare-breasted beauties. The Daily Mail (sometimes also known as the Hate Mail because of its strong views) tends to display completely different boobs...
...
written by GusGus, February 01, 2008

The reason Randi's site was blocked at the hospital is because it had nothing to do with hospital business. If you want to access a web site for personal reasons, do it on your own time at your own computer.
...
written by lsinervo, February 01, 2008
I see nothing in the Cedza Dlamini's quote that would suggest researchers, scientists or aid organizations lack compassion. If more people adopted a the humanist philosophy of Ubuntu they would be more compassionate towards those suffering and donate more money to HIV/AIDS research. Even if one does not experience any sense of spiritual interconnectedness with others, surely not even the most hardened skeptic can deny the physical interconnectedness that exists. We all breath the same air and drink and recycle the same water!

There is good reason that many skeptics are viewed as being nit picky and coldhearted and it's not because of superior critical thinking skills. Grant it, with all the scammers and con artists around becoming jaded is understandable, but the snarky comments about this Starbucks quote sound more like parroting of skeptic rhetoric than any sort of thoughtful consideration about what perspective is trying to be conveyed and encouraged and it leaves people many people with the view that some of those who claim to be skeptics really aren't so good at critical thinking before commenting at all.
...
written by Threeballs, February 01, 2008
"
written by Jeremy Henderson, February 01, 2008
Bit off topic, but it was announced this week that Montel Williams will be ending his show./quote]

Unfortunately, this is allegedly being replaced by Montel reruns culled from the entire program run of 17 years--something along the lines of a greatest hits kind of thing.

Must be a 'green' thing--recycled Woo.
...
written by neighbour, February 01, 2008
So what's wrong with that? Hot weather DOES make people cranky. Cops don't like windy and/or hot weather. It really does bring out the worst behaviour and it's got nothing to do with anything outside credible science. But as us sceptics suspect: the full moon doesn't cause crankyness.
...
written by Die Anyway, February 01, 2008
article: "...directions for thousands of cities world wide."
Randi: "...but I'm really amused by the 'millions of cities' reference.
Oops.

"Too many cults, too few comets."
...
written by six7s, February 01, 2008
Just cos it's been published on teh interwebs don't make it so...

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4382604a11.html
King DENIES blaming 'sun and moon' for crime rise

Police Minister Annette King says she is not blaming the "sun and the moon" for contributing to crime problems.

National MP Simon Power said earlier today that Ms King was in denial if she believed the sun and moon were to blame for a spike in the number of murders in January.

Experts have blamed a number of factors for 10 violent deaths in January, ranging from stress to alcohol, but Ms King's comments stunned Mr Power.

Ms King, who is also Police Minister, yesterday visited the scene of a drug-related gang shoot-out in south Auckland and said the hot summer and full moon were to blame for the recent "unusual events".

"It's well documented within the police – and we've had a long hot summer – and the view is that we often get things happen in this month that we wouldn't have happening in winter," Ms King said.



Ms King's spokesman said Mr Power was trivialising the issue by trying to ridicule her.

"When asked by the New Zealand Herald, she said that is what some people, including one senior police officer she had heard, were saying or telling her--- she was not making this claim herself," the spokesman said.

...
written by Lemastre, February 01, 2008
By the way, the present, and future, tense of "trod" is "tread."
...
written by Chris C., February 01, 2008
We probably shouldn't be too hard on Islam for their peculiar practice of facing Mecca when they pray. It presented a problem that resulted in important scientific advances.

Arab geographers realized early on that, the earth being a globe, the most meaningful way to interpret "facing Mecca" was as the shortest route between there and one's present position. They further understood that this was not necessarily the direction one would think if the direction were plotted as a straight line on a flat projection. It was in order to solve this problem that they devised great-circle navigation, which absent weather considerations is now used to plot aircraft routes.

This was done in a spirit of free inquiry unparalleled in the world at the time, which resulted in enormous advances in all areas of science. Even today, not a few scientific and mathematical terms are of Arabic origin. (Often the origin was ultimately Greek, but they entered Western vocabularies via Arabic.) It was Islamic science in part that led to the European Renaissance, once translations of Arabic works (as well as Greek works then only available in Arabic translation) were assimilated in the West.

It's a pity that Islam no longer actively encourages this kind of investigation.
...
written by Chris C., February 01, 2008
And in defense of Scooby Doo, I'd like to point out that in every single episode the "ghost" turns out to have been a complete fraud and there was a rational explanation for everything. (At least in the original series; I have no idea what its more recent editions contain.) So somebody responsible for that show had a decent grip on reality.
...
written by dr pepper, February 02, 2008
Did anyone see the SNL "Ghost Hunters" skit? They expose the silliness of the show by the simple expedient of turning on the lights. I wonder if it would be possible to keep the lights on for the afb investigation, or failing that, get someone outside the team to secretly tape everything so there'd be a record to compare with the results of the programmer's editting.
...
written by aristetelis, February 02, 2008


Hi:

It is me Frenchy Again. This time from P.R. where I am on vacation. I have read enough about this woo woo peddlers claiming the million dollar is bogus. Perhaps someone preferably you; make a new challenge. With hopefully more than a million dollars. We could get a big list of people pledging to give (X) amount of money for anyone who can give proof of this "Wooparanormal woopie powers". Hopefully adding more than a million U.S.D. Dollars. I would be great if it contain names of well known personalities. I am not one of them and not even remotely close to be wealthy; but I will be more than happy to be the "numero uno" on the list with a pledge of a 1,000 dollars. Just because I am totally sure I will never have to shell them out if you and your team do the testing. As a second item; it seems that Fidel Castro is willing to give into prayer. Rev. Yiye Avila from Puerto Rico has been invited to Cuba to pray for mister "uno" himself. He is supposed to be able to pray and heal the sick people. Let see what happens. Yours; Jose L Rivera Massa. Teacher.
...
written by Chris Hunt, February 02, 2008
I think you're unfair to Annette King, or whatever anonymous police officer she was quoting. Why shouldn't the crime rate be affected by the sun and the moon?

It's much easier (I imagine) to shoot somebody when you can see them clearly. So gunfights on bright moonlit nights are more likely to become serious than those on dark nights. Maybe just as many rounds are expended every night, but how many hit home?

And what about the sun? If NZ has been weathering a prolonged spell of unusually hot weather, the chances are that people are getting irritable about it. Sleep patterns get disturbed and folk just get more cranky - well, I know I do and I don't think I'm all that exceptional. Plus, if the weather is fine people are more likely to go out rather than stay home, and they're probably more likely to drink too much too.

Does "more people less sleep more booze = more violence" sound like a deeply woo-infested equation to you? It's only a hypothesis at the moment - obviously I'd need an all-expenses-paid trip to New Zealand to check it out - but I think it's pretty plausible.
...
written by Jeremy Henderson, February 02, 2008
"And in defense of Scooby Doo, I'd like to point out that in every single episode the "ghost" turns out to have been a complete fraud and there was a rational explanation for everything."

Which did not prevent the team from initially believing they were up against the supernatural in every instance. The Scooby Doo Crew seemed to operate on the assumption that the supernatural exists, despite the fact that they've never actually encountered it themselves.
...
written by Tommy Finke, February 02, 2008
Seems to be a good choice to appear in "Welt der Wunder". I will definitely take a look!
...
written by wendy e. cousins, February 03, 2008
A recent academic review of the literature on "Madness and the Moon: the Lunar Cycle and Psychopathology" by Iain McGowan and Mark Owens from the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland found that the majority of published literature, both classic and contemporary actually rejects the cause- effect influence of the lunar cycle on mental illness and further notes that studies that have reported positive findings have been shown to be methodologically flawed, inconclusive, or confounded with other variables. The authors conclude that this misplaced belief that the moon influences human behaviour only serves to reinforce negative stereotypes of madness, insanity, and mental disorder.

The full paper published in the German Journal of Psychiatry is available online:

http://www.gjpsy.uni-goettingen.de/gjp-article-owens.pdf
...
written by Observer, February 04, 2008
Four seconds with Google brought up a review paper, "Temperature and Aggression: Ubiquitous Effects of Heat on Occurrence of Human Violence" which notes:

Of the three basic issues outlined at the beginning of this article,
only that concerning the existence of direct effects of temperature on
aggression has received sufficient empirical attention to warrant a
conclusion. Clearly, hot temperatures produce increases in aggressive
motives and tendencies. Hotter regions of the world yield more
aggression; this is especially apparent when analyses are done within
countries. Hotter years, quarters of years, seasons, months, and days
all yield relatively more aggressive behaviors such as murders, rapes,
assaults, riots, and wife beatings, among others. Finally, those
concomitant temperature-aggression studies done in the field also
yielded clear evidence that uncomfortably hot temperatures produce
increases in aggressive motives and behaviors.


And here's the abstract for a more recent british paper:

An analysis of annual, quarterly, and monthly data for recorded crime in England and Wales yielded strong evidence that temperature has a positive effect on most types of property and violent crime. The effect was independent of seasonal variation. No relationship between crime and rainfall or hours of sunshine emerged in the study. The main explanation advanced is that in England and Wales higher temperatures cause people to spend more time outside the home. Time spent outside the home, in line with routine activity explanations for crime, has been shown to increase the risk of criminal victimization for most types of crime. The results suggest that temperature is one of the main factors to be taken into account when explaining quarter-to-quarter and month-to-month variations in recorded crime.

...
written by NYCSkeptic, February 04, 2008
I had stumbled across the skepticalinvestigations.org website early this year and after going through some of the bull content on that site I became curious who was behind this. It seems to be some mysterious organization, but nowhere is there any information about who is running it. A quick search on WHOIS turned up that the site is actually wholly owned and operated by Rupert Sheldrake.

The site also claims to be the inspiration behind the Skeptiko podcast. Recently Alex Tsakiris from this misnomered podcast has engaged in debates with Steven Novella of the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast regarding the validity of Sheldrake's rather dubious conclusions regarding the psychic prowess of dogs.
Also, Sheldrake has recently posted his entry in the Edge Foundation's question of the year "What have you changed your mind about?" with a fallacious misrepresentation about skepticism. Thus, Sheldrake has disingenuously put up this skepticalinvestigations.org site without being upfront about the fact that it is him and not some organization of repute behind it, launched a podcast to publicly defend his well debunked research, and apparently is now using this site as a source for woo's of all flavor to attack you. It looks like 2008 will be his "full court press" against skeptics everywhere and it is unfortunate that he doesn't even have the guts to openly declare that he is behind it all.

At the very least, you are honest enough to put your name on your website and organization and you do not put up pretend front groups to assert your positions. If you've ever read any of Sheldrake's writings or research this sort of underhandedness is not even unexpected.

--M
...
written by Chris C., February 04, 2008
Which did not prevent the team from initially believing they were up against the supernatural in every instance. The Scooby Doo Crew seemed to operate on the assumption that the supernatural exists, despite the fact that they've never actually encountered it themselves.

Shaggy and Scooby certainly believed it, but they were probably stoned. I'm pretty sure Velma was always skeptical, and merely tended to get drawn into the group panic even though she knew there was nothing supernatural involved. Fred and Daphne were simply airheads.

Seriously, although the characters themselves weren't that sensible, the ultimate solution to the mystery always was. (Relatively speaking, that is. Some of the explanations presented wouldn't have been very effective in real life.) The consistent healthy message was that no matter how convincing the appearance of the supernatural may be, a better natural explanation can always be found if you look hard enough. In a TV wasteland of "Psychic Detectives" and that ilk, it's astonishing that they took this approach, even at the time.
...
written by Adam Beach, February 05, 2008
Originally I sent the article about Annette King mostly due to the moon comment, although the majority of the attacks (not just the murders there have been many vicious assaults occurring too) were premeditated making heat of passion (pun intended) crimes from being hot and irritable or drunk a less likely explanation. And most murders in NZ occur using knives or melee weapons* meaning that the full moon's light has bugger all to do with it. However I digress the real reason this brings concern to me is that it is unlikely that she would repeat the words of a anonymous police officer if she didn't believe them to be true or plausible, and we trust her with police policy over here I would hope for more common sense (it is also likely that she is just trying to do damage control over her reputation so saying it was a repeated message from someone else is really just covering her own backside).

* We are isolated by the sea and have tight gun laws making it difficult to get firearms at all
...
written by nealnorton, February 05, 2008
Considering that our military here in the U.S. has embraced superstition in the form of the christian religion so enthusiastically I guess it makes sense that ghosts and ghost hunters are taken seriously.
...
written by chuck, February 05, 2008
I can't think of anything more secular and less woo-woo than the principle of "ubuntu", which means pretty much means "humanity" (as in the humaneness sense, not the generic sense). Is it too much to ask to just LOOK UP THE DAMN WORD before condemning it as chanting-dancing-witch-doctor woo-woo? You know, research?

This is why I have a problem relating to my fellow atheists and skeptics, because they're almost without exception a bunch of dour ranting Angry White Males (and yes, I'm one too, doesn't mean I want to keep the "A" as a badge). I return once again to the image problem we have as grumbling debunkers of all that is warm and fuzzy (even if it's wrong). I still like the "bright" label -- can we stay bright instead of stormy and dark?
...
written by chuck, February 05, 2008
> meaning that the full moon's light has bugger all to do with it.

Actually, if you can see the full moon, it's probably not raining.
...
written by Chris Long, February 06, 2008
Darn - I wrote a humongo spiel about CNN and blasted it to oblivion by a bad keystroke...

Let's just say that the comments above by an insider show that favorable coverage with CNN can be had with payola and the network is still in a long, slow, dizzying spiral downward, begun under Friend of Bill (Clinton) Rick Kaplan...
...
written by politas, February 06, 2008
What gets me about the Minister King story is that the actual quote from her doesn't mention the full moon at all, just the hot summer, which is quite reasonable. I want to know what the minister said to justify them saying she said "the hot summer and full moon were to blame".

Journalistic integrity?
...
written by Steel Rat, February 06, 2008
Psychism itself is a con--or a delusion for those who really believe in this "phony power."


Psychism can't possibly be a delusion, since the "psychic" has to make shit up to con people.
...
written by Chris C., February 06, 2008
Psychism can't possibly be a delusion, since the "psychic" has to make shit up to con people.

What you say is true of cold readers. In such cases, it's their victims who suffer from the delusory belief.

I've also met quite a few people who genuinely believe they're psychic. They're usually people with active imaginations and a strong need to see themselves as special or unusual in some way. No number of misses or wrong guesses will get them to admit what they've been doing to themselves, and they don't bother to find out the truth of much of what they think they see, taking their impressions for reality.

Not a few of them also genuinely believe they have magic powers of some kind. These people raise confirmation bias and "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" to an art form.
...
written by ChuckHash, February 07, 2008
As a skeptic, I'd like to add my voice in defense of the concept of Ubuntu. It is a secular concept and had Matthew Besson adopted some Ubuntu, he would have been more empathic and less willing to (foolishly) attack.

A more important issue arises. Matthew Besson suggests that science will resolve poverty. It will not. The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were filled with this exact hope and the twentieth century was the response. Science provides us with options but the way in which we apply those options relies on our character. And, our characters would be improved with Ubuntu.

From Wikipedia: Ubuntu, pronounced [ùbúntú], is an ethic or humanist philosophy focusing on people's allegiances and relations with each other. The word has its origin in the Bantu languages of Southern Africa. Ubuntu is seen as a traditional African concept.
...
written by Blake Stacey, February 08, 2008
Rick Ward offers this correction to a previous SWIFT:

Relativity and quantum theory are two of the three best attested, most successful scientific theories we have (the third of course is evolution). Relativity and quantum theory generally deal with very different things, and within their limits they have proven to be extraordinarily accurate and have passed every test anyone's been able to think of. The difficulty is that they're fundamentally inconsistent and thus cannot both be true, but it's only when they come together under very extreme conditions, such as in the core of a black hole or in the first tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang, that they break down, and give results akin to dividing by zero.


However, this correction is itself incorrect. There are two theories of relativity, the special and the general. As the names suggest, the latter extends the former; general relativity (GR) adds to special relativity (SR) the ability to describe gravity, doing so by incorporating the notion of curved spacetime. SR is consistent with quantum mechanics, as is made clear in the discipline of quantum field theory. To quote the first chapter of A. Zee's Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell,

Quantum field theory arose out of our need to describe the ephemeral nature of life.

No, seriously, quantum field theory is needed when we confront simultaneously the two great physics innovations of the last century of the previous millennium: special relativity and quantum mechanics. Consider a fast moving rocket ship close to light speed. You need special relativity but not quantum mechanics to study its motion. On the other hand, to study a slow moving electron scattering on a proton, you must invoke quantum mechanics, but you don't have to know a thing about special relativity.

It is in the peculiar confluence of special relativity and quantum mechanics that a new set of phenomena arises: Particles can be born and particles can die. It is this matter of birth, life, and death that requires the development of a new subject in physics, that of quantum field theory.


Zee's book is a technical text for graduate or advanced undergraduate use (it's just the closest one I had at hand). For a popularized description of the ideas involved in QFT, see Richard Feynman's QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter.

It is the addition of gravity which causes real problems, the most promising (yet far from complete) solution to which is currently string theory.
...
written by Mrs. Maintenance, February 11, 2008
I didn't read through all the comments, so please forgive me if this has been stated before. For those of you who encounter a "site blocked" message when trying to access randi.org, try using a proxy server such as vtunnel.com or bypasstoday.com. If your school, work, or government has the site blocked, you should be able to access it via one of these proxies.

Good luck!

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment (login is on the left column under the PEOPLE section). Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
Google
Web Randi.org

JREF Donations

Enter Amount: