People

Sylvia Browne

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Featured Item

Begley - Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain
Begley - Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain

Add to Cart

Tyson - The Sky is Not the Limit
Tyson - The Sky is Not the Limit

Add to Cart

Events Calendar

« < July 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
SWIFT March 14, 2008 Print E-mail
Written by James Randi   
Thursday, 13 March 2008
Table of Contents
  1. Purple Plates

  2. Another Withdrawal

  3. Don’t Miss This

  4. A Request

  5. Airborne News

  6. An Assignment

  7. Another Pet Psychic

  8. No Wonder!

  9. Very True

  10. Moving Forward – Maybe

  11. PBS Offends

  12. Lilieci Case Solved

  13. A Loser Is the Winner

  14. That Pot Head Man

  15. Unlikely Penguins

  16. Adelaide Woo-Woo

  17. Homeopathy Alert

  18. In Closing…



PURPLE PLATES

padre pio

Reader Dean Malandris:

Those of us trying to maintain our life raft of sanity in an ocean of stupidity have probably developed a sense of being "comfortably numb," as Pink Floyd once said. If rationality is represented by low-lying land mass, and woo-woo is represented by the ocean, then the more I look around, the more I'm convinced that we're suffering Intellectual Global Warming.

I originally thought this was a web site that might have described, in intricate detail, the contents of Nikola Tesla's kitchen cabinets, or side board, but oh no: www.tesla-energy.com

The only sensible thing I could make out was on the "About Plates" page, where it says:

Plates have been in use for more than 30 years (1971) and have still the same effects as on the first day.

That, I can believe…




ANOTHER WITHDRAWAL

Last week I mentioned at randi.org/joom/content/view/172/27/#i10 that a major test of homeopathy in Greece has met the expected fate, being abandoned by the homeopathy community. Now, this 1,000-word notice has arrived from Gábor Hraskó, Executive President of the Hungarian Skeptic Society:

It seems that we are halted in the preparations for bringing the homeopathy test to Hungary. The board of the Hungarian Homeopathic Medical Association made a decision last week not to support the test.

In advance I organized a small, but enthusiastic group of scientists within the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and around to support the test. I also made preliminary checks on what kind of permissions we would need from the authorities. I visited the board of homeopaths together with a doctor, who is relatively well-known in Hungary. The meeting was very kind, but I experienced the very same attitude I used to meet with when speaking to advocates of any alternative therapies. They are real doctors so that it was quite frightening that they had no clue about pharmaceutical tests at all. They made the usual claims that their duty was healing and not testing. Also they said it was very much unfair not to treat half of the patients for sake of science.

Randi comments: Yes, this “treat half the patients” problem is a very legitimate complaint. However, I believe that there are other possible modalities for conducting such a test, and avoiding any compromise of proper care.

They also have another problem that they did not dare to reveal very much, but I think it is one of the major reasons for their withdrawal. They practice the so-called “classical homeopathy” (similarly to Mr. Vithoulkas), as opposed to “clinical homeopathy” in this practice, where they perform the traditional time-consuming screening of the patients and try to find the correct remedy using multiple visits. Their repertoire consist of more than 1000 remedies (I have a small collection of them including Moon light 100C, Berlin wall 40C, Oxigen 200C etc.) and only some 300 of them are currently registered with the authorities in Hungary. It means that their prescription method is – well – at least in the grey zone if not totally illegal.

To be honest, I assume this must be the case in most of the countries. In spite of the simplified registering rules applied for homeopathic remedies – they are registered as real drugs, not dietary supplements – but no toxicity and efficacy tests are required, and most of them are not registered. They import them on an ad hoc basis or ask their patients to get the remedies directly from the manufacturer.

They know Vithoulkas and in a sense they trust him. He was recognized in Hungary some years before, based on the proposal of the association, but as they say, his reputation is very much declining now. The only real question they asked was why Vithoulkas had not been able to find an alternative hosting institution in Greece? This is a good question indeed and I could not answer it. Partly because of this, they tended to believe that we have some “secret agenda.”

Their actual list on which they based their decision was as follows. My comments are in brackets:

• The ethical background of the experiment is not clear, either from the experimenter or the patient sides. (GH: they have no clue about the ethical norms of normal drug testing);

• No institutional background exists in Hungary that would guarantee the fairness and effectiveness of the test. (GH: they do not trust anyone);

• There is no local remedy manufacturer. (GH: this would be a real challenge, though as they had said they would use some “good quality” manufacturers in their practice);

• We believe that a test like this should involve much more patients. (GH: so that it is easier not to make tests at all).

This is of course mostly nonsense, but I cannot do anything about that. I know Mr. Randi said for years that homeopaths will never finally agree on such a test, and I think it is time to close this project.

During the last years I learned a lot about CAM [Complementary/Alternative Medicine]; I read their literature, investigated their trials and clinical tests and followed the skeptical interpretations. By now I know that these types of tests are not really adequate for testing CAM in general. Practitioners of homeopathy, or other therapies like acupuncture, can refer to real positive clinical tests that are sometimes even published in prestigious journals. It becomes more and more clear that looking for “evidence” – positive clinical trials – for a treatment, is important, but not sufficient to prove that a treatment is really useful. Even if the physical plausibility of a treatment is zero, as in the case of homeopathy, clinical tests would result in positive outcomes from time-to-time, “false positive” results. This happens even if the tests are performed perfectly, by scientific standards. The standard statistical methods – significance intervals, etc. – that are used in the tests, give valid results only if the methods under testing are relatively plausible. More and more scientists insist that plausibility must play a more important role in the evaluation of clinical trials than it does now, which is practically none. That is why experts tend to avoid using the term “evidence-based medicine” in favor of a new one: “science-based medicine.”

As homeopathy and other CAM practices can present positive clinical tests, generating a new negative one would not make any real difference. A false positive one would not prove anything, either. The real point is that there is no plausible theory about how homeopathy could work, at all. For a rather long time, I also stated that we might know or not know how something works; if it works, then it exists. Now I understand that this approach fails if we routinely test totally implausible phenomena.

I do not think this result was unexpected, but I am rather sad. You put a lot of energy into it, and during the last stages, I also tried my best and we are again back at the starting point.

I am ready to participate in any similar projects or activities in the future. The Hungarian Skeptic Society is also moving forward. We are progressing, and it seems we could overcome the problems about our relationship to the “old skeptics.” We started uniting all skeptic forces in Hungary. Our next target is Uri Geller, who arrives in our country this month. If you have any ideas how to welcome him, please let us know.

Thank you for this report. Again, it was no surprise, but just a disappointment. It illustrates – again – just how much the woo-woo community fears proper tests of their baseless claims. And yes, I have some excellent ideas on how to welcome Mr. Geller back to his homeland. We’ll discuss that, Gábor...




DON’T MISS THIS

india

On March 3rd, 2008, Sanal Edamaruku, the president of India’s well-known Rationalist International, challenged Pandit Surinder Sharma, said to be India’s most powerful tantrik – “black magician,” to demonstrate his powers on him. It was an unprecedented experiment. After all his chanting of mantras – magic words – and ceremonies of tantra failed, Sharma decided to kill Edamaruku with the “ultimate destruction ceremony” on live TV. The proposed victim agreed, and voluntarily sat on the altar of the black magic ritual. We’re told that as a result, India TV observed skyrocketing viewership rates. No one wants to miss a live-on-TV killing...

Go to tinyurl.com/2ehs4m to see a report on “The Great Tantra Challenge.” Just in case you were worried, Edamaruku is still with us, and remarkably healthy, despite all the evil influences thrown at him, but the details of this farce are fascinating. Quackery, superstition, religious fever, all rolled up into one. Of course, the Sharma forces are scrambling to offer excuses, but we can hope that at least some believers became enlightened…




A REQUEST

Someone named simply, “Nick” asks that we post this notice:

I'd like your help and support in informing your readers about my new video blog, Critical Critique. It's still new but it is in the making of becoming the best video blog with the largest collection of the most informative and educative video articles that encourages critical thinking and evidence-based inquiry/investigation over faith-based living and emotion-driven thinking. You can view it at www.criticalcritique.com

Critical Critique is going to compile and bring the most educative, informative, thought- provoking and relevant video collections available on the internet tgether in one place for everyone's easy reference, which will be labeled according to categories. So, at any time if people wish to look at a specific video for some reason, they can come back to this video blog and quickly retrieve it by simply clicking on the categories.

Subscribers will also receive these videos that will add to their knowledge on any specific subject, all presented by some really good skeptics, scientists, critical thinkers and atheists on the internet, includes your good self. Along with my critiques and descriptions for each video content, I would appreciate viewers critiques in the comment section of this blog too, based on what they think was good or bad about the content of the videos.

The reason I'm doing this is because I've seen a lot of great videos in places like YouTube, Google Video and the rest, but all these are not really categorized in the way I want, especially for what Critical Critique represents. Eventually, these videos get lost and forgotten somewhere in the crowd. I like these really good videos to be seen and remembered by everyone, both by believers and skeptics in all generations. And I like to hear everyone's feedback on it as well. Critiques or comments are important and valuable to Critical Critique. I like to know whether it changed peoples lives in some way, or their understanding or perception, for the better or for the worse? Do they agree or disagree with it, and why? Do they have a testimonial that they want to share with everyone? And so on...

This is another way to make a difference in the world with regards to beliefs and religious differences. It will indirectly attract believers or religion and the supernatural to visit the site and view the videos as well, and I'm sure it might change a lot of minds in the process too.




AIRBORNE NEWS

airborn

At randi.org/joom/content/view/172/27/#i3 last week, we ran an item about the reversal of a quack product, but now we hear that it just may survive the slap-on-the-wrist we reported…

The company agreed to pay more than $23 million in a class-action settlement over false claims in an ad, but that just might be the extent of the damage. It also agreed to refund consumers, who bought Airborne under pretenses that it fights colds, and to pay for ads notifying consumers about the litigation in major publications. Airborne has denied claims of any wrongdoing. Said a rep:

We have tens of thousands of satisfied customers who buy Airborne again and again. Since its inception, Airborne offered a 100 percent satisfaction guarantee… We reached the settlement to avoid mounting expenses related to the litigation. Airborne vigorously disputes the claims and continues to stay behind its denial of liability.

However, there is another lawsuit pending in federal court in New Jersey. The plaintiffs in the case are represented by a group of consumer rights attorneys, who feel that the monetary settlement is not enough. As I pointed out last week, that’s very true. The litigation should have been about stopping the company from bogus marketing of their product. This action reflects recent general attitudes about such false advertising; Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough pulled ads that were similarly questionable.




AN ASSIGNMENT…

Here’s an exercise for those of my readers who may wish to offer an explanation to a gentleman who wrote me back in August of 1991. Sorting through ancient letters in a box I came upon, I found a 3-page inquiry from this chap in the UK who just may not have received a response from me, though I’m rather careful to attend to such matters. In any case, I don’t recall the inquiry, nor any answer I might have sent, but find this to be an excellent example of how someone can have genuine doubts about their skepticism after experiencing an event that they find to be inexplicable. Here’s the pertinent part of the letter. Please read it, and send me your analysis…

I must admit to an experience for which I have no explanation. Please, do what you can to rescue me from this intellectually lame position I have had to maintain for 35 years.

The incident occurred during my first year at Merton College… [A domestic servant employed there] suggested that [my friend and I] might find it interesting to go along to a meeting of her spiritualist church. I cannot remember why; perhaps she overheard us discussing religion, as students then, though perhaps not now, were wont to do. We went out of intellectual curiosity, two atheistic socialists eager for a first-hand experience of the people's opiate of a different kind; much more exciting than attending Mass.

In all I think we went, at irregular intervals, four times or five and I cannot remember to which occasion the incident relates. Certainly, it was not the first. The “drill” will be familiar to you: The medium, usually, but not always a woman, requests each member of the congregation to place a personal item, anonymously, on a tray. The tray is then passed to the dais where the medium selects an item at random, holds it up to be seen, and asks to whom it belongs.

The victim calls out “it's mine” and the familiar descriptions of dead loved-ones, complete with details of facial or other physical features and clothing begins, concluding with the comforting message.

In those days I smoked, and my personal item was a cigarette lighter. When it was selected I duly owned up and then the medium, a middle-aged woman from Leytonstone in East London, I remember… asked me a most astonishing question: “Does the name 'Dearlove' mean anything to you?” It did; at the time very little, but more came to light with research.

Ted Dearlove was at one time an insurance agent whose job was to call at the houses of the poor, of which mine was one, collecting the two-penny premiums on the policies designed to make a fortune for the Prudential and leave enough for the decent burial of the contributors. I would emphasize that at the time of the incident I am recounting, I knew nothing except his name, that he was dead and that he had been a “friend of my mother's.” All else I discovered later. Dearlove called at the house for several years when I was a small boy, before giving up his job and becoming a publican [bar-owner] in the same town. According to my elder brother, my mother was in love with him. Because of this alleged relationship and because of his completely unscripted intervention in my life that Tuesday afternoon in Oxford, I toyed with the idea that I was Dearlove's son. I am now inclined to reject this possibility because the physical and psychological similarities between my brother and myself are so great that I must accept that we are of identical parentage. When I replied “yes,” I was given the usual comforting message: “He is watching over you.” That was all.

I would comment as follows:

1) I don’t remember being in need of the message, though I was miserably and hopelessly in love at the time and vaguely suicidal.

2) I knew only Dearlove's name and knew nothing of him as a personality. I had never met him.

3) I knew he was dead, some fifteen years or more, but this knowledge was not significant to me.

4) The medium a) could not have known I would go to her meeting, b) had never met me before, c) could not have got the name from me by thought transference (which I do accept, because it occurs too often in everyday situations to be doubted) because I did not spend my time focused on a person whom I had never met and who was of no significance to me, d) even if she had been given “Dearlove” as a name associated with my family (by the domestic? My family lived in Oxford and it is conceivable that the domestic knew of Dearlove and my family, but I know of no reason why she should have and we lived at opposite ends of the city), she did not know my name and would have looked an obvious fraud if she had guessed wrongly and asked the question of my friend.

I wrote to the medium, whose card I was given, in an attempt to gain some clarification of the incident but, of course, I did not receive a reply.

Please, Mr. Randi, how did she do it? There was nothing general or random about the medium's approach, it was direct and specific. Have you heard of parallel experiences?

I await – with great interest – the comments of SWIFT readers on where the perception of this performance failed to produce an answer…! …!




ANOTHER PET PSYCHIC

Reader Matthew Stikeman, in Canada, reports:

It's happened again. This time, though, it's an out-and-out claim of 100% success for an “animal psychic”! Just this morning, in today's National Post newspaper – in Toronto, Ontario – at the top of page A6, first section no less, is the headline:

Nova Scotia pet psychic locates dog that went missing seven months ago.

Now, that's pretty specific, with no wiggle room to the claim. Either the psycho did or did not locate the dog. No equivocating about "helping," "assisting," or any of that. WOW! I couldn't believe it. Here's the story, as printed:

A dog that went missing seven months ago has been located with the help...

Ah, now we're wavering just a bit – that old weasel word “help” is rearing its sneaky head...

...of a Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, “animal communicator” who says she had a vision of where the pet would be found. Maggie Carruthers had a vision of Lady Belle three weeks ago, says the dog's owner, Josee Poulin:

She said, "I can see Lady Belle. I see two Shelties running and panting and they're [in a meadow]."

Ms. Carruthers said it is usually difficult to communicate with missing dogs...

To say nothing of trying it with those present, no less!

...but noted that Lady Belle's spirit was so strong, she was able to see visions of what the dog was seeing

WOW! looking throught the dog's eyes. Amazing! How does that visual signal get sent to the psycho?

Ms. Poulin had contacted the pet psychic several months ago. Said Ms. Poulin:

She asked me to e-mail a small picture of Lady Belle, and I did that and she started to communicate with her

The SPCA captured Lady Belle on Wednesday night in the same meadow where Ms. Carruthers says she saw here in a vision, and returned her to Ms. Poulin.

Among other problems with this claim and story: I wonder, does it occur to anyone that there's some really fancy fantasizing going on here? The psycho sees through the dog's eyes what hasn't even occured yet! Three weeks ago, she saw through Lady Belle's eyes – by her own claim – where that dog would be on Wednesday, in what was then the future, when it was to be found. It was not yet in the meadow, it had no clue that it would be in the meadow. Yet the psycho saw this, peering into the future, through the dog's eyes! That's a pretty amazing dog, too. Its eyes were able to see into the future and then transmit that visual image to the psycho!

What claptrap. Amazing to think that people believe this nonsense, even more amazing to see it reported this way. Surely either the dog or the psycho would be a great claimant for the Million Dollar Challenge – psychic power, clairvoyance, precogntion and probably a few other tantalizing abilities thrown in just for good measure. How good it would be to show this to be the fraud which it is.

More holes here than in a sieve.




NO WONDER!

Reader Jason Colavito – and others – have offered an explanation for the rather biased “anchor” attitude shown at randi.org/joom/content/view/172/27/#i13::

I'm sure other readers have already pointed this out, but there's a good reason TV anchor Tim White was adamantly opposed to skeptics in the homeopathy piece you ran in Swift. Mr. White is the former anchor of Sightings, which aired from 1992 to 1997 on Fox, then in syndication, and on the Sci-Fi Channel. For those who remember it, Sightings covered topics ranging from alien abductions to ghosts to Bigfoot. To the show's credit, it did try to debunk Fox's alien autopsy video, but that was a rare skeptical moment in an otherwise completely credulous show. It is no surprise, then, that Mr. White is still promoting the same belief system that made him famous years ago.




VERY TRUE

Reader Tim Norfolk at the University of Akron writes:

I loved the Prophet manual in this week's column. In reading it, I saw that one could substitute “economist,” “pundit,” “political scientist” or “educational expert,” everywhere, and it would still be valid.

But let’s get rid of the prophets first, Tim, next the economists…




MOVING FORWARD – MAYBE

smiling bob

A federal court jury in Cincinnati has found the owner of a company that sells phony "male enhancement" tablets and other herbal supplements, guilty of “conspiracy to commit mail fraud,” “bank fraud” and “money laundering.” We’ve all seen the sappy television commercials for “Enzyte” with "Smiling Bob," a goofy character whose life improves with Enzyte, a product which allegedly boosted his sexual prowess.

Steve Warshak, 40, the founder and president of Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, which distributes Enzyte and a number of other products alleged to boost energy, manage weight, reduce memory loss and aid restful sleep, could face more than 20 years in prison, and his company could have to pay tens of millions of dollars in fines. Before the hallelujahs, look back at Airborne, please…

The charges are plentiful. Prosecutors claim that customers were bilked out of $100 million through a series of deceptive ads, manipulated credit card transactions and the company's refusal to accept returns or cancel orders. The government also allege that the defendants obstructed investigations by two federal agencies. Some former employees of Enzyte testified that the company created fictitious doctors to endorse the pills, fabricated a customer-satisfaction survey and made up numbers to back claims about the product’s effectiveness.




PBS OFFENDS

Reader Thomas Skala reports:

I awoke this morning eager to turn on my TV so that I could catch my VCR capture of last night's Charlie Rose interview with Stephen Hawking. My TV, still on the local PBS station (WVIZ-Cleveland), came on to a program from Deepak Chopra. I was seven minutes in when I tuned in, but I don't think I missed much.

I am still watching it now (11 minutes in), and I still find myself waiting for the punchline. It really bothers me that PBS – my only trusted source of televised worldly information (I have no cable) is not only showing this, but it now using it to gather contributions from watchers. I have donated in the past, but not for THIS, though maybe I shouldn't be surprised, after the Wayne Dyer series.

However, I thought that I would mention it to you because, if you could see the program, you would appreciate and agree with to the idea that "Doctor" Chopra has embraced his rockstar status: he is wearing boots, worn jeans, suitcoat-over-shirt, and – the point of my comment – glasses with red-sparkled frames. I don't believe that they are actually sequined, but it still makes an impression when he is there on the catwalk with listeners sitting on mats behind him.

Thank you for reading, and I'm sorry that this time I was not able to hold myself back from sharing.




LILIECI CASE SOLVED

lilieci

From reader Mihai Amariutei in Romania, about the ghostly affairs in the town of Lilieci, seen last week at randi.org/joom/content/view/172/27/#i2, comes this revelation:

The ghost story in Lilieci wasn't widely reported around here – I'd never heard of it before reading it in SWIFT, despite my living only about 60 km. from there, just one hour of driving. Then again, it may be that I read the wrong media around here to be up to date on these things. So I searched for more info on the net.

Some relatives believed the culprit was the old lady's grand nephew, who seemingly was always around whenever the strange phenomena manifested. For a lot people, however, the most likely explanation was the recent passing over of a relative without having the last rites – the Eucharist – administered.

So, a full exorcism ritual was performed, with a full team of seven priests led by an archpriest.

The mighty devil was the kid after all – he finally admited to the deeds as a revenge against his grandfather, who threatened to report to the police the theft of US$40 by the child. He scared the policemen just by kicking a bucket under the table with his leg.

By the way, "Lilieci" in Romanian means "Bats", so the vampire asociation you made is quite apt. Lilieci is not a town on its own, just a village in the Hemeiusi commune, near the town of Bacau.

Mihai goes on to describe the atmosphere in his country:

The general situation around here will undoubtely improve, as our education establisment was specifically tasked by law to offer instruction in religious matters in all primary and secondary education. Qualified instructors will be provided by the respective churches and paid from the education budget. Of course it is not good form to teach children conflicting world views in the same institution. Some think this is the wrong aproach and seek help to overturn this.

Such initiatives will fail, of course, as most of the population here (99.9%) is religious and for a public figure to support an action that can be seen as oposing religion, is to commit political suicide, not unlike in the US of A. Unlike the US of A , where the secularisation of the state and education is enshrined in the Constitution for now, in Romania the reverse is true, as criticizing religion may even result in legal troubles.

The textbooks teach that children will be run over by a car if they sin, and present any nonorthodoxism as the work of the devil. GRID, an ad hoc organization, launched a tongue-in-cheek proposal to have Alchemy and Astrology included in the curriculum, too. Mocking the battlecry used by religious establisment – "No Lyceum without God" – their proposed slogans are "No Lycea without Panacea" and "No Scope without Horoscope."

How about “No Sense without Nonsense”...?




A LOSER IS THE WINNER

A comment about the recent “Uri Geller succesor” show in Germany from reader Marc Studtmann:

Mr. Randi, thank you very much for coming to Germany and appear at the "Welt der Wunder" TV-Program and debunk some of the tricks of Uri Geller and the self-proclaimed psychic contesters on his show.

So, now there is a winner and a successor for Uri, who won't actually quit now, I fear. And the winner is...taadaa: Vincent Raven. I was baffled when I heard this. This was probably the guy who blew the most of his tricks. Or maybe that's why he won, because it's fun to watch the weird fella, who knows?

Vincent Raven is a guy who performs his show accompanied by a raven, to which he is married, as it was said when he appeared for the first time on the show. And that very animal is his eye to the "Anderswelt" the "Otherworld," you know, this one with dead people in it and all that stuff. The raven was mostly sitting on a T-shaped bar and sometimes unloading his excrements on the stage, very mysterious! The guy himself is no less strange with his funny accent – he's actually from Switzerland I think, where a lot of woo-woo-guys come from – and speaking to the animal in an invented language.

This is the elected successor of Uri Geller, or is it one of the winners of the show in the other 3 or 4 different countries? I don't know!

I haven't watched the show regularly, because it was too embarrassing, but everything I saw was obvious fakery sold as the real thing.

And so, thank you for shedding some light on this thing for those who believe this to be real. On the "Welt der Wunder" program I really liked the guy who gives seminars where you can learn telekinesis and telepathy. I liked the part where he claimed to alter the consciousness of a metal plate and tell it that he is magnetic, so that it will stick on his chest. Well, I'm not an expert on the “psycholgy of metals,” but I don't think that metal plates actually have a consciousness. After having told the plate that it should kindly adhere to him, he wandered across the room so stiff and bent backwards, that even the metal plate – conscious as it is – must have thought of him as an idiot.




THAT POT HEAD MAN

pot head man

Marc just mentioned another “magnetic man” stunt artist, which leads me to explain a puzzle I offered you last week. We asked you to guess who the man was with a pot stuck to his forehead. This guy – Miroslaw Magola – has been around for years, festooned with pots and pans, spray cans and various household utensils. It’s even possible that he’s deluded, and really believes he’s “magnetic.” I first heard of him in October of 1996, when we were only offering as a prize the pledges of those who volunteered them, and at that moment it stood at US$776,000. At that time, Magola had some London lawyers write to us, but did not tell us what his claimed “power” was. Then his legal representative, Victor Romiszewski, informed us that:

Our client confirms he can lift items from place to place without holding the items. He can wave his hand (and arm) with the attached item vigorously to show how strong the item is attracted to his hand. He can also lift items from the floor with the use of his forehead. (ie by the item being attracted or attached to the forehead). All the above is done without trickery (ie like adhesive, glue etc) and he can attract items up to the weight of 1kg. The main point of his ability is that by lifting the objects he is defying the present laws of gravity which probably is a very interesting fact at least for the world of science. He can also attract the objects using his chest, stomach and shoulders.

At this point we would like confirmation from you whether he is suitable within your specific needs as a challenger for the Psychic Challenge. Obviously there is not [any] point in pursuing this matter if you are not interested in our client.

We await hearing from you.

I responded:

The reward as it presently stands is US$971,000. It increases almost daily. And, yes, we are definitely interested in the claim made by your client. However, based upon your description, this sounds like the common "bio-magnetic power” claim that I have examined many times before in various parts of the world, particularly in Russia. If so, it does not fall within the designation "paranormal" or "supernatural."

Let me explain. All demonstrations I have seen of this claim, involve placing various objects (coins, flatirons, books, bottles, etc.) onto a body surface such as the hand, chest, forehead, arms, or back. The surface used is inclined away from the vertical, and the objects remain in position simply by friction and the adhesion offered by natural perspiration. In all cases, I have dusted the surface with talcum powder, and the objects have then slipped off. There is nothing supernatural, paranormal, or in any way unusual about such a claim. It is well within the established parameters of physics. As for lifting objects "from the floor with the use of his forehead," this can easily be done by anyone, using flat objects like coins or small plates, and the natural skin oils present.

Your letter uses the phrase "he can attract items up to the weight of 1 kg." I remind you that "attract" means (Webster's Dictionary) "to draw by a physical force, causing to approach." This would be similar to the manner in which a magnet draws small iron objects to itself, without touching the objects. Can Mr. Magola do this? Without touching it first, can he draw towards himself' a 1 kg weight?

That was the last I heard from Mr. Magola or his lawyers, until he wrote again in 2003 – with the prize now at US$1,000,000 – from Munich, Germany. He provided another rambling discussion of his claimed powers, and a video that clearly showed he was using the same methods I’d seen so many, many, times before. See randi.org/jr/082704gluton.html#7 for another mention of talcum powder, which appears to bring on severe allergic reactions in “magnetic” people…

Here’s just part of what Magola’s flacks say about him on his own web page:

“Magnetic Man” Miroslaw Magola defies laws of gravity with an extraordinary ability – applying the power of psycho kinesis [sic] he can raise anything from metal pans to marble statues, transport them through the air to affix to his body, then creates a force to keep them there – simply using mind control.

An avid enthusiast of the phenomenon of psychic energy, Miroslaw has developed his skill to manipulate lifeless objects in mid-air to obey his will, even forcing them spin around or shake. His mental powers are so keen that he can jump around while an object is stuck to his head without losing his mental grasp of the item. Miroslaw explains how he employs psycho kinetics [sic] to perform these uncanny feats, “It works because I load myself with energy (I connect myself to it) and at the same time I wish for the object to raise [sic].” Miroslaw has undergone numerous tests for his perplexing skill which remains unexplained by conventional science to date.

Mr. James Randi, of American James Randi Education Foundation (J.R.E.F), who has spent much of his life to debunk paranormal phenomenon and occurrences world-wide, does not dispute the authenticity of Magola’s talents.

In January 1997, Dr. M. Karger of the German Max Plank Institute examined Magola´s abilities. During a test using items for which some were supplied, he was able to touch the objects at all times and even attach them to Miroslaw himself. Without physical contact, Magola raised a cup, tilting it along horizontal and vertical axes. He kept it hovering in the air, moved it around and set it down. Although Miroslaw Magola has received world-wide notice, he remains unaffected by the attention. His passion is for the scientific investigation into psycho kinetics [sic] and paranormal abilities and to gain their widespread acceptance.

“The key to humanity’s advancement is the study of our own bodies” says Magola.

That comment about my involvement with Magola is – to put it kindly – a damn lie. Just to set things straight, Miroslaw Magola is an unwashed man with sticky skin who does a simple, juvenile stunt that can be totally defeated with a few grams of talcum powder. He’s a fake, a trickster, a liar. When will I see this quoted on his website, I wonder? And when will Magola treat us to a hovering cup, or transport a marble statue through the air? I can’t wait…!

And don’t neglect going to the hilarious “levitation” site: tinyurl.com/2sa8kj. Reading the comments, it seems evident that no one caught on! The very first photo should do it…




UNLIKELY PENGUINS

Reader Matt Maddock gives us his thoughts...

Randi, you are a hero and your beard puts mine to shame! Keep up the good work, championing reason and reality in the face of the increasing pile of lunacy that we find ourselves presented with!

I have lost count of the number of occasions upon which I have seen some woo credophile fire out the challenge that someone must prove the non-existence of their chosen fairy substitute. As a life-long scientist the notion that one cannot prove a negative is deeply ingrained into me, but it seems that, to many, this basic principle is anathema. I thought, therefore, that I might try my hand at providing a plain-speak explanation of that principal and why the burden of proof must lie with the woos. Having written it, I found myself at a loss as to what to do with it, so I thought, perhaps, it might find a home with the JREF.

Still waiting for the tartan penguin, Matt.

What follows is something we might all want to remember, if and when this argument arises. Mind you, some negatives can be proven, such as, “I am not made of lithium.” The definition of lithium, what constitutes one’s mass, and a few definitions are required, but I think I can prove that negative, rather definitively. I can also quibble about “first-hand sensory experiences.” We magicians provide those regularly, and they just may not represent reality. However, Matt deals here with the more important and basic matters with which we are faced in everyday life; not many of us encounter magicians... He writes:

I do not believe in tartan penguins.

I have no direct experience with penguins and I am no zoologist, but I know a few (zoologists, not penguins) and I understand a fair range of the basic principles that might affect such matters (penguins, not zoologists). I love the idea of a tartan penguin, don’t get me wrong; nothing would make me happier than to see a waddling little butler sprucing the Antarctic up a little with a nice Burnet plaid.

However, I do not believe in tartan penguins and, yes, that makes me a little sad.

The reasons for my incredulity are myriad. First and foremost, I have never seen a tartan penguin. I realise that I have never seen a whole host of things in which I do believe, but first hand sensory experience is my first line of reasoning. It is not, however, the only line of reasoning. Were I to see a tartan penguin, my first act would be to fetch someone else, preferably someone I trust, and to ask them if they could also see said dapper bird. I would wish to inspect it closely, to check it for the smell of drying paint, to look for zippers and, in extremis, to have my own blood-work done to ensure that I was not under the influence of any hallucinogenic substance. If after all that I still had a tartan penguin, then I would begin seriously to believe in it.

I cannot prove that they do not exist, however. I might spend a lifetime in the Antarctic collecting penguins and even if (as I confidently predict) none of them were tartan in colouration, I could not say for certain that there would not be one just behind the next rock.

If someone were to come to me and claim that they had such a bird, well, what a wonder! Of course I would like to see it! All that would be required to prove that the thing exists would be for that person to bring that bird forward.

They might provide photographs, but those could be faked. They might provide a host of witnesses, but they could all be mistaken, paid, mad or just up for a giggle. However, were they to bring me one – just one – example of a genuinely tartan penguin – one which remained a tartan penguin under the conditions given above – then I would believe in it. All my previous statements would be negated, I would humbly climb down and admit to the world that, in fact, there’s a Black-Watch clan aquatic bird in our midst.

I can never, ever, prove beyond doubt that there is no such thing, but everything I do know about evolution, energy conservation, the food chain, camouflage and entropy (and other things besides), backed up by the rigorously documented work and experimentation of a great number of people who are all cleverer than I, tells me that a naturally tartan penguin is simply not in the cards. The weight of evidence against it is overwhelming.

But imagine when someone claims that they have found a whole community of such things! Naturally, I would find myself sceptical of the claim, given the weight of evidence on my side. However, all that this person would have to do to utterly destroy my point of view and prove their own would be to produce one single, solitary example of the genus. That’s all.

But then the excuses would start; the penguins do not like to travel (fair enough, I’ll go to them) – the penguins are only tartan every first Tuesday of the month and it’s Wednesday 4th (right! I am prepared to wait 30 days to see this bird) – the penguin is only tartan when it’s not observed...

...it doesn’t take long before the excuses become unbelievable. Even when offered $1 million to provide any concrete evidence of the tartan penguin, no one can produce it.

Therefore, I am afraid, I still do not believe in tartan penguins. All I ask to prove me wrong is one simple example, just one, to counter the overwhelming weight of evidence that backs up my position; yet no one will produce it.

Perhaps you can see what I’m driving at?

Matt, I also didn’t see any statement of just what standards you’d accept for this bird to meet the definition, but perhaps I’m being ungracious...




ADELAIDE WOO-WOO

The staff of the neighborhood library in Adelaide reported to superiors that they felt “uncomfortable” at night when alone in the building. This, of course, could only mean that something supernatural had to be behind the feeling, since quiet old buildings at night are always comfortable, cozy, places in which to work. Duh. So the powers-that-be, the local council, naturally acted rationally and called on a ghostbuster to save the employees from terminal goosebumps… The Tea Tree Gully Council, in Adelaide’s outer suburbs, summoned a “spiritual adviser” to rid the building of spirits – but the council has assured everyone that it was not an exorcism, though that’s specifically what an exorcism is designed to do! Did the advisor just advise the spooks to go away?

No, the carefully non-denominational adviser is believed to have performed a séance in one of the library's toilets. Why the council didn’t hire a plumber in the first place, was not discussed, nor do we have any report of the success or failure of the non-exorcism… However, the council's marketing manager, Mark Horton, said:

Library managers, keen to ensure their staff remained happy and comfortable in their workplace, secured this service at their own expense, in their own time and with full support of library staff.

Everyone was woo-woo on this one…




HOMEPATHY ALERT

Reader – and Skepchick – Tracy King writes:

I get regular alerts about new market research, and today received news about a new study by Global TGI [Target Group Index] into the alt.med market worldwide, with a focus on homeopathy. A whopping 94% of people in India trust homeopathy, with the USA coming in at 18% and the UK the lowest at 15%. My blog entry about it is here: skepchick.org/blog/?p=1082

Judging from the number of homeopathic outlets I’ve seen in the UK, and the fact that the Royal Family – especially Charles, of course – endorse it, that 15% surprises me...




IN CLOSING…

Due to a variety of circumstances, we still have very limited space available on our Galapagos cruise this August 8-18. We were previously sold out! This is a second chance for those of you who wanted to go but didn't register. We have until May 1st to fill this space, so don't delay. More information is available at http://www.amazingmeeting.com.

Again, very busy. Preparing for a trip to the UK, Penn State, and the MIT Media Lab...


Signature





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Technorati!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
Comments (87)Add Comment
...
written by monstrmac1, March 14, 2008
On the medium segment.

Typically a cold reader will asks broad things that could apply to any dead loved one. I think that the reader in this case was asking, "does the name dear love mean anything to you?," and not Dearlove. So that if your mother, brother, father, son, daughter, husband, wife, mistress, grandpa, grandma. etc etc etc. used to call you "dear love" or start a letter as "dear love" you would be instantly drawn to this person in your mind. I'm sure that the reader then told her who dearlove was. In other words if the reader asked me that and I said, "my mother used to call me dear love" then the reader would claim it as a "hit" also. Practically any recognition of the words dear or love would have drawn the reader to an associated name and been considered a hit. Its a shame this person spent time pondering his paternity over a con artist's ramblings.

William
...
written by Dave_In_Aus, March 14, 2008
Yep, ditto the above. It seems that the 'psychic' has been incredibly lucky with her 'hit' on this occasion. My guess is that she meant "Dear" or "Love", which of course everybody would have some association with. The author seems sketchy with his memory of the actual event, so its likely he has assigned this as a hit in his own mind, which is of course exactly how cold reading works. Ironically enough, it sounds like the psychic wasn't even aware that the author had a Mr Dearlove in mind (I mean, what are the chances?!) as I'm sure she would have milked it for all it was worth had she realised.
...
written by Bruno, March 14, 2008
Negatives of the form "xyz does not exist" that are actually easy to prove are those where xyz cannot exist. When the attributes of xyz are logically inconsistent, xyz cannot exist and therefore doesn't. An oxygen isotope with atomic weight 7, for instance, cannot exist, because oxygen is defined as having 8 protons.
...
written by Ian Osborne, March 14, 2008
Perhaps the 'psychic' was expecting a reply in the form of, "yes, my grandmother called me that", or something similar, giving her an opening to work her cold reading? When the reply was a simple "yes", she anticipated a sceptic who knew not to feed her information, so cut the conversation short with "He's watching over you"? She thought she was getting herself out of a fix, and didn't even realise her 'dear love' remark had proved a hit...
...
written by colin.davis4cg, March 14, 2008
Regarding the Adelaide library phenomenon:
I once saw a TV documentary which included an account of people feeling uneasy and threatened in a lab or some such building. It turned out to be the strip lighting, which was emitting a very low-pitched hum, which in turn affected people's nervous systems.I've been to Adelaide - an attractive city - but I didn't notice any spooks. There were some strange looking people on Rundle Mall, though!
...
written by John Atkinson, March 14, 2008
I note that the 'reading' took place in Oxford, where the student lived, as would most of the remainder of the audience (?) at the spiritualist church. Choosing the name of an insurance agent was good, hundreds of people would have known it, rather than the name of the window cleaner or the man who reads the gas or electricity meter.
...
written by Chris Hunt, March 14, 2008
I'm intrigued by the homeopathic "remedy" Moon light 100C apparently available in Hungary. How do they go about collecting moonlight, before diluting it away to nothingness?

Or is it a special weight-watchers version, for those worried about the calorific content of full-fat "Moon 100C"?
...
written by jcwept, March 14, 2008
Re: Dearlove

I'm a 52-year-old Londoner and I've heard of 'Dearlove, the East End insurance agent' even though I'm from the South end of town. The pseudium may have picked up a London inflection among the Merton College accents, especially in 1956. And I note that your correspondent didn't actually attach any significance until after the session.
...
written by ove, March 14, 2008
Like John Atkinson said: The medium choose a name that would have been familliar to A LOT of people around there. I quote: Ted Dearlove was at one time an insurance agent whose job was to call at the houses of the poor, of which mine was one, collecting the two-penny premiums on the policies designed to make a fortune for the Prudential and leave enough for the decent burial of the contributors.
He must have had contact with many people in that town and a clever medium could easily find a name like that.
...
written by ChthonicTonic, March 14, 2008
I like that the "purple angels" have holes in their heads.


I assume it is from all of that harmful cell phone radiation.
...
written by Careyp74, March 14, 2008
"It turned out to be the strip lighting" I've noticed myself get sick because of flourescent bulbs at school. Under that light, my skin would look pale and olive, and you would can barely notice the light flickering. I would get nauseous sitting in rooms like that.
...
written by startz, March 14, 2008
Hey, before you get rid of the economists if I can forecast the economy can I have the million dollars?
...
written by Careyp74, March 14, 2008
If you haven't visited the forum today, there is a thread about a new Ben Stein movie about Darwin and creationism.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=108843
...
written by Buckler, March 14, 2008
I, too have been dismayed to see my local PBS affiliate hosting the likes of Deepak Chopra, Wayne Dyer and other feel-good new age woo woos to solicit funds from viewers. I eventually contacted the local station's ombudsman to complain, and was informed that I'd essentially have to live with it, because that's what brings the money in (of course!), and that with Federal cutbacks in CPB funding, they had little choice but to pander to the gullible. My response was that until they removed such nonsense from their program schedule and replaced it with responsible and informative programming, they would not receive a dime from me.
...
written by kopas, March 14, 2008
Lately I’ve be hearing more reports about trace amounts of pharmaceuticals in the water supply. I’m wondering if believers in homeopathy will switch from their normal supply of woo-woo cures to straight tap water. Think of the savings!
...
written by Lady Underwood, March 14, 2008
Re: Dear Love....could it also be "Deer Love" which could resonate with hunters and nature lovers alike?
...
written by ladolphus, March 14, 2008
The Purple Plates are also said to have the occasional nasty habit of...POOF...just vanishing into thin air! It's almost as if Tesla got a 50 year jump on the US automakers' concept of "planned obsolescence."
...
written by RexCamp, March 14, 2008
Perhaps the UK insurance agent (Dearlove) presented advertising pieces to his clients. It is not unusual to give away pens, calendars, paperweights, etc. In those days, would it not be possible to give away a lighter, perhaps one distinctive enough, that would be readily recognizable by a "medium"?
...
written by speedwell, March 14, 2008
OK, another opinion about the medium... First, "a stopped clock is right twice a day," as they say. So, the medium hit on "Dearlove." So what? If she was sure, she would have said, "Mr. Dearlove, your mother's friend, is watching over you" or words to that effect. Instead, she floated a trial balloon. She didn't actually know. So the "hit" was purely coincidental.
She could have used any fairly obvious English name such as Brookstone or Greenleaf. But now that she knows that Dearlove is a good strong draw, she'll continue to use that one.

Second, is the fellow even sure he heard her question correctly? Could she actually have asked, "Does the name Dear or Love mean anything to you?" Since he had a connection to a Dearlove in the past, he may have subconsciously interpreted a painfully obvious fishing attempt as a reference to the actual person he used to know.
...
written by tisdone, March 14, 2008
On the old topic of the special cables, today's "The Joy of Tech" comic is a great read. Though the comic is primarily about Apple (computers, ipods, etc) - they often cover other subjects as well. So, without further ado:
http://www.geekculture.com/joy.../1082.html
...
written by Critical Critique, March 14, 2008
Thank you Mr. Randi for publishing my request in SWIFT. Really appreciate it. I hope I'll get everybody's support as well and subscribe to Critical Critique's video blog.

I also like to inform everyone that ever since Critical Critique started, there's this guy who keeps spamming manipulative lies about James Randi and his work on Critical Critique, especially about the million dollar paranormal challenge. You can see his comments here at this link:

http://www.criticalcritique.co...s-of.html


Once again, thank you all for your support and your continuous contribution in the world of science, skepticism and critical thinking,

Nick
Critical Critique
...
written by ChicagoPete, March 14, 2008
I too vote for the idea that Mr. Dearlove was an educated guess vs. a lucky guess or a misunderstood "Dear or Love". Don't forget, not only was this guy the neighborhood insurance agent, but he also became the local bar tender and/or owner.
...
written by Chris C., March 14, 2008
On the exorcism, I suspect a translation problem. This can happen with ecclesiastical terminology even from people who are otherwise fluent in English. The only rite in the Orthodox Church that requires "a full team of seven priests" is Holy Unction ("Anointing the Sick"). Exorcisms are typically done by only one priest. I've never heard of any exorcism service requiring seven. You can do it that way -- priests can concelebrate in just about anything -- but it's by no means normal.

This makes me wonder about the sequence of events as presented. Holy Unction is performed for a person or people, not places. It's usually done in response to a serious physical ailment. (It's not supposed to replace standard medical care. An abbreviated version with one priest is more usual at hospital bedsides.) But it can also be done for people who are regarded as suffering from serious "spiritual" illnesses. For example, someone who's been behaving so mischievously that he disrupts an entire town.

On "Dearlove" I think speedwell has it. Another possible hit would be if there had been anyone in the past who addressed the victim as "dear love", or one or the other. It was the kind of coincidence that simply happens every so often that you had an exact match.
...
written by Chris Long, March 14, 2008
The housekeeper dood it ! The domestic likely tipped off the psychic, since there can be a lot of money in that racket. She seemed a bit overeager to get the young men to the 'reading'...
...
written by Chris Long, March 14, 2008
On the PBS pledge period thing: in this state it's really bottom-of-the-barrel new-age gurus, all trying to make a buck. And pledge week has morphed into pledge month...

I call them every pledge period and tell the volunteer I am prepared to pledge what the Wayne Dyer et al junk is worth to me: a nickel. Of course, they won't take an amount that small. When they suggest five bucks, I tell them it's not worth anywhere near that and they need to read between the lines and figure out what I am trying to tell them...

Also, it is discomforting that the 'children's programs' all have commercials and the way kids sit in front of Barney and Clifford in a trance is frightening. It's a god way to shut up toddlers, I guess, but very neglectful, in my opinion...
...
written by emdee, March 15, 2008
I think it's a pretty simple case of a lucky guess. The medium got all she needed when he reacted to the words, which aren't that unusual. "Dearlove" or dear love, who knows. It's also possible she said something like that, such a "dearie" and he just made the connection. Had it been wrong, like any cold reader she would have tried something else until she got a hit. I'm also a little suspicious about the lighter too. Where did he get it, maybe from his mother? Did it have an engraving he had never noticed?

On that Tesla nonsense: these clowns who are whining about energy from cell phones should know that the invention Tesla tried hardest to achieve was the ability to transmit high level electrical energy through the air. If they think the tiny energy being broadcast by a cell phone is dangerous, surely they'd be horrified by high voltage electricity being broadcast with enough power to run refrigerators, cars, etc. as Tesla envisioned. Idiotic scam artists.
...
written by mjr, March 15, 2008
Animal psychics are tons of fun to play with!!

My ex-wife used to have an "animal communicator" show up periodically at the barn where we kept our horses. So one day I was standing there brushing my big bay draft-cross and the communicator walks over with a group of her fans:
communicator: "Oooo!! What a pretty fellow! What's his name?"
mjr: "you tell me!"

That pretty much hammered a spike through that.
...
written by ScottGPDX, March 15, 2008
Despite Bruno's semantic twist, you cannot prove a negative. Using an oxygen isotope as an example makes this sound vaguely scientific, but what if I reformulate your xyz thus. "A green ball that is red cannot exist, because by definition green is green, and not red."
You are not really proving anything there, Bruno.
...
written by ScottGPDX, March 15, 2008
In other words, Bruno, 7 ≠ 8.
...
written by Diverted Chrome, March 15, 2008
The key phrase:
"but more came to light with research"
It was NICK that had the "hit", not the trawling psychic. Did Nick not do 99% of the work by himself?
...
written by KayJayTee, March 16, 2008
OK, I know I’m probably going to be attacked mercilessly for this, but I feel the need to defend Dr. Wayne Dyer a tiny little bit. Thirty-odd years ago, I read his first book, entitled Your Erroneous Zones, and it changed my life quite profoundly for the better. It was absolutely NOTHING like the spew he generates now. It was all about independent thinking, taking control of one’s own destiny, not blaming others for your failures, and there were even clear undertones of atheism in those pages. I fully credit that book with nudging me in the direction of skepticism and leaving my religious upbringing behind. I was in high school at the time, and it was just the psychological tonic I needed to release myself from the go-along-with-the-crowd bondage I’d been raised under.

Now, I’m the first to admit that he’s turned into a total loon these days, claiming to write books dictated to him from beyond the grave by deceased philosophers. I imagine he knows full well he’s spouting trash, but the siren call of more dough probably proved too much for a man in his position. I just thought it would be nice for people to know he was not always this way and actually sincerely helped some folks. Or at least one.

By the way, I’m surprised no one in the comments section here has yet mentioned the Indian tantrik story, which is one of the coolest things I’ve read in a long time. Sanal Edamaruku has got some cajones to put up with that BS on live TV. If someone started brandishing a knife at me or pressing my temples, I’d likely have decked him. I hope what he endured will result in a few people seeing the light.
...
written by notzed, March 16, 2008
Tea Tree Gully isn't a very old suburb - circa 1970 - so I doubt it has a quaint little library filled with narrow corridors of dusty tomes. It is also about 20km from 'Adelaide', which is a separate distinct local municipality run by the Adelaide City Council.

The area around Tea Tree Gully is one of those mortgage belt areas - full of the interest-rate-sensitive, lower-middle-class 'aspirational voters' who put and kept John Howard in power for the last long sorry decade. These people worry about their mortgage, the duco on their flash new holden 'ute', the water for their pool and the price of beer. They don't have time to understand why believing in ghosts is nonsense or even recognise it as an issue.

I just had a look a the story mentioned, on news.com.au - they have a poll asking if you believe in ghosts (The News was Murdoch's first paper ... so no surprise on the poll question), and only 23% of respondents so far have put down 'don't be rediculous' vs about equal for the other two 'yes' and 'i've got an open mind'. Of course, news.com.au isn't a particularly high-brow paper, but I guess it's what the masses read here and even a small poll population of 850 or so must reflect something. How saddening.

As much as a I respect the work of the JREF and other like minded individuals - have you already 'lost the war'? If you go out into the 'general public' (and scarily, many research scientists) - plenty of people DO believe in ghosts, or God, or Gods. They think acupuncture probably has something to it. They go to the chiropractor every month for their expensive massage. Every time you mention that something isn't scientifically plausible they just say 'science doesn't know everything'. They distrust/dislike 'elites', so are actually closed minded to rational argument.

e.g. in Australia chiropractors are seen by many as legitimate equivalents to phsyio-therapists (physical therapists). Professional sports teams have them on their staff. Many MANY people have their regular monthly 'readjustment' - although they don't seem to know why, it just makes their back feel a bit better for a few days. TV advertisements tout chiro and acupuncture as paid-for-benefits of private health insurance.

This *is* the reality of the population at large, and no amount of debunking or argument will convince them otherwise to any significant effect. A few minor 'victories' here and there - a fine and commendable effort. But is it actually going to get anywhere?

Sorry for being so pessimistic ...
...
written by borealys, March 16, 2008
I also can't help noticing that the "Dearlove" story was recounted 35 years after the fact. A lot can shift around in our memories in that much time.

There used to be a quaint little teahouse in my hometown, where my friends and I would go every so often. A couple of times a week, the teahouse would host fortune tellers from around the community, and we would each fork over the extra five or ten dollars to take a turn. Usually, they were pretty unimpressive, but one night there was a woman who did the whole show. Tarot cards, wax drippings, handwriting analysis, horoscope, crystal ball. I was the token skeptic in my group of friends, but I confess that I did think it would be fun to go through the whole thing. In the end, though, I was as unimpressed as ever.

There was one particular thing she said that amused me. She told me that I worked in "education or health care." Wow, I thought afterwards, what a great guess to make when doing a reading for a young woman -- name two vaguely-defined, female-dominated fields. I gave her credit for the hit, however, because I was training as a speech-language pathologist, a profession with close ties to both health care and education.

That was how I remembered it, anyway. So you can imagine my surprise when, a mere year and a half later, I was flipping through some old scrapbooks and came across the card the fortune teller had made notes on during the reading. It turned out that she had not made the unimpressive-but-accurate guess of "education or health care" but, in fact, had listed four things: administration, organization, teaching, and medicine. Not only was she more vague than I remembered, but she was less accurate. I am not a teacher, and I am not a doctor.

Even not believing one bit in her psychic powers, I still gave her credit for a much more accurate and direct "hit" than she had actually gotten. And if she hadn't been scrawling notes on a card through the session, and if I hadn't stuffed the card into my scrapbook instead of throwing it away, I would have spent the rest of my life with this incorrect memory.

This was after only a year and a half. Who knows how much more the story might have shifted in my memory after 35 years?
...
written by Chris Long, March 16, 2008
KayJeeTee: There are many texts that would have had the same effect at that point in your life. Your emotional state at the time made you receptive and, hence, pliant.

It's like emotive poetry: Verlaine may have a huge effect when you have just broken up with a long-time companion and very little effect when you are in the midst of a satisfying relationship...
...
written by KayJayTee, March 16, 2008
Chris - your point is well taken. I'm sure there were many books that would have helped me during that time, or maybe even a good rational-thinking adult that I could have looked up to. My comment was really more about Dyer than me. He takes a beating in SWIFT periodically - deservedly so - for the pop-culture psychobabble he now makes his living with. I just kind of felt the need to let everyone know that there was a time, long ago, when I believe he was a sincere and scientific-minded person who embraced thought and logic. Somewhere along the way, we lost him.
...
written by Bruno, March 17, 2008
In other words, Bruno, 7 ≠ 8.

Exactly my point.

The reason why I took oxygen-7 as an example, is because oxygen 7 cannot exist while oxygen-8 merely doesn't exist, on account of a nucleus consisting of 8 protons and no neutrons being unstable. But oxygen-8 is not a logical impossibility, merely a physical improbability. Therefore one could start arguing "well you haven't seen each and every oxygen atom have you, so how do you prove oxygen-8 doesn't exist". That's a negative you can't prove. That oxygen-7 doesn't exist on the other hand, is a negative that's trivially easy to prove on account of logical inconsistency.

As a result, paranormal claims that are internally inconsistent are thereby immediately disproved. As another example, the theodicy problem shows that omnipotence and omnibenevolence can't go together. Therefore, a God defined as being both, cannot exist. The impossibility of proving the nonexistence of God applies only to Gods having no specified properties or to Gods specifically designed to elude logical disproof. The God used by "enlightened" Christians to argue for the nondisprovability of his existence is quite different from the one they pray to. To move from one to the other as called for by the purpose is an example of the "redefinition fallacy".
If we limit ourselves to the kind of practical Gods as believed in by realistic believers, positive atheism is an intellectually tenable (if not very strong) position.
...
written by Maz, March 17, 2008
AN ASSIGNMENT…

I am currently reading “The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God” by Carl Sagan. In it, he recounts a story of a policeman who reports seeing a very obvious flying saucer land. He is so convinced that he reports it to the local boffins (scientists). They arrive and concur that it is clearly a (landed) flying saucer. They then notice a farmer nearby who seems to be unable to see the spaceship. When they ask the farmer if he can see the craft he eventually points out that it is a home-made device he uses on his farm.

The point behind this story of course is that even though almost every step of this tale sounded bullet-proof, it still ended up having a prosaic explanation. The only broken link in the otherwise solid chain was the fact that the policeman was so impressed by the very sight of the apparent spaceship that he retrospectively “remembered” seeing it land. Of course in actual fact, he did not see it land, but since it was “obviously” a spaceship, then he must have seen it land ...

I think the gentleman recounting his interesting experiences at the spiritualist church must have been equally impressed at some point during the proceedings (as a result of the usual party tricks) and subconsciously made the appropriate post hoc alterations to “what happened” in order to consolidate this impression.

And finally, bearing in mind that the gentleman in question believes in thought transference (I quote: “could not have got the name from me by thought transference (which I do accept, because it occurs too often in everyday situations to be doubted)”) rather than in the simple coincidence of people in the same circumstances and with the same information coming to similar conclusions contemporaneously – I think it is fair to say that he may not be quite as critically minded as he thinks he is.
...
written by notyy, March 17, 2008
It is true that a 'negative' can not be proved because it is true that nothing can be proved. A sceptic really should keep this in mind. Within formal logic, and in mathematics, there are procedures which constitute acceptable 'proof' but the axioms within logic and mathematics, by definition, are not proved. Thus, the idea that truth can be demonstrated relies on the acceptance of unprovable fundamental statements. Furthermore, in systems of logic of sufficient range to be interesting, Goedel's Incompleteness Theorems assert that there are non-axiomatic 'truths' which are unprovable. This implies that any woo-woo artist worth his salt can escape attack that is based on logic. Nor is it any comfort for the sceptic to appeal to statistics and probability, if what he seeks is to 'disprove' any claim to within any degree of confidence, because statistics and probabiltiy are rooted in the very systems of logic that are compromised by Goedel's Theorems.

Frankly and honestly, all we have is intuition, and I believe that the only method that is likely to have effect in changing the minds of people about claims we consider to be misguided or fraudulent is ridicule. We cannot 'prove' anything to them because we cannot 'prove' it to ourselves. But for the people like Geller and Browne, who seem to us so clearly manipulative and dishonest, there is the option of a constant tirade of scorn against them. To me, the JREF seems to be headed in the right direction.
...
written by CGHJ, March 18, 2008
You should probably mention that Tesla, a true genius responsible for much of our modern world, had never even heard of Purple Plates and probably would have thought it as much nonsense as we do. A man named Ralph Bergstresser claimed after Tesla's death that he and the Big T has been working on them and he had only decided to reveal this after his death.

So we can basically infer that Ralph Bergstresser is a con artist who realized attaching the Big T's name to something would get stupid people to buy it. I realize that Tesla went a little kooky later in life but it should really be Ralph Bergstresser's photo by the story (if such a thing exists), as he is the perpetrator of this fraud, not Tesla.

Man, I wish I had the balls to sell inanimate objects to people and just attach some dead scientists name to it. Then again it would never occur to me that someone would believe something like that. I guess I just don't think big enough.
...
written by Bruno, March 18, 2008
@notyy
It is indeed true that I cannot prove that the world around me isn't an illusion concocted by computers and fed into my disembodied brain sitting in a vat of nutrients. Science neither proves nor understands any of the phenomena it studies down to the level of "absolute truth", and neither does it try to. Science simply produces models and theories that "do the job" i.e. successfully predict the outcome of experiments. It is at this level that woo-woo miserably fails. You really needn't dig deeper.

If indeed we live in an artificial illusion, science still manages to discover the laws that govern this illusion and to make use of them. That is all that is relevant to us who live inside it. Like the theories it produces, science is useful simply because it happens to work. True to the scientific method, it's so far worked every time.
...
written by notyy, March 18, 2008
I agree, Bruno! with everything you say. I wasn't trying to imply that science is useless. The target of my comment was really the charlatans who can wriggle out of scientific responsibility by the simple argument:'Yes, science works when it is applied to its proper domain because its 'proper domain' is defined to be where science works': the implication being that there are other 'domains' where scientists have nothing to say and, therefore, should say nothing. If there are such domains, then the psychics and their like have a valid argument: so, we have to ask whether there are domains into which science doesn't venture, and the answer is 'yes, there are'! Do chimpanzees experience love? Do reindeer dream in color? These have the appearance of scientific questions but there is nowhere to go with them. The point is: science works when it investigates questions that it can investigate. It does not work when it has no avenue of enquiry. Now, psychics, for example, can, and frequently do, claim that their 'powers' are not arbitrarily reproducible and therefore do not enter a scientific domain. Indeed, when a scientific experiment does not confirm a psychic's claimed 'power', the proper conclusion is 'Eiher the phenomenon does not exist or it is not susceptible to investigation by scientific methodolgy. That is the honest conclusion, and too many sceptics conveniently forget about the second alternative. Sorry to be so long-winded! But my belief remains: the only method I can think of to combat the woo-woo predators successfully is ostracism.
...
written by Chris Long, March 18, 2008
KayJeeTee: I do remember when he was actually a practicing MD and wrote that book. But he is totally given over to New Age junk now. I listen to him during the pledge drives and have a brew; it's really hard to figure out how he is 'helping' people. But he is profiting big time by PBS shilling for his books.

The whole pledge thing here is now new age gurus and good musical programs they only play during pledge drives. After the pledge drive, it's back to "victim culture" shows about black folks and anti-conservative junk.

What a racket ! Tax exempt and all...

Look at the comments posted all over Randi - obviously done by literate, rational people. There are some VERY well-rounded folks reading and posting here...what a wonderful refuge from vulgarity that plagues most of the web.

BTW - ghosts, UFO's etc are all about tourism. Yokel governments usually totally prostitute themselves to the woo-woos amongst the populace.
...
written by Candiru, March 18, 2008
>> In those days I smoked, and my personal item was a cigarette lighter. When it was selected I duly owned up and then the medium, a middle-aged woman from Leytonstone in East London, I remember… asked me a most astonishing question: “Does the name 'Dearlove' mean anything to you?”
...
written by Candiru, March 18, 2008
Oops, the rest of my comment didn't come through. Perhaps the cigarette lighter was an advertising giveaway and had Ted Dearlove's name on it?
...
written by jbspry, March 19, 2008
Ooh, ooh, me too!
Bruno, I take exception with your characterization of our conception of reality as an "artificial illusion". Artifice is the deliberate falsification or mutation of the objective, and illusion is the misinterpretation of the objective (Randi's bread and butter!).
I suggest that in reality (for lack of a better word-play) our estimation of reality is provisional and incomplete but sound as far as it goes (insofar as it follows a scientific path). We may be profoundly ignorant, but we are not deluded (I speak of those among us who insist on seeing the universe rationally).
If there is a "real" reality out there that we are blind to due to our artificial illusions, then the religionists are as likely to be correct as to its nature as anyone else.
...
written by Bruno, March 19, 2008
The sound of a jbspry prematurely jumping on a key word :) I don't think I "characterised" reality as an artificial illusion. I only pointed out that at the platonic level there's no way of proving we aren't living in one, and, crucially, that at any other level it doesn't matter.
...
written by Critical Critique, March 19, 2008
Just wanted to quickly thank you, Mr. James Randi for the comment you left in the Critical Critique video blog http://www.criticalcritique.co...ns-of.html for the confused and deluded spammer, David Mabus who is currently in a mission claiming credit to have stopped James Randi's Million Dollar paranormal challenge...
...
written by gr8hands, March 19, 2008
notyy (and others), there are NO domains which are beyond or exempt from scientific investigation. The very concept of a "test" is to use the scientific method (how else would you consider "testing" something?). Science is the only possible way anything can be legitimately tested.

If reindeer have no color receptors in their retinas, then they cannot possibly dream in color. Tests have already concluded that chimpanzees experience love (and grief and most other emotions we previously thought only humans experienced).

No guesswork required, only science.

When someone says that "science can't answer this question" they are actually using the scientific method to arrive at the conclusion! They take an idea, evaluate it using their own skewed methodology, and arrive at a conclusion. That's a primitive and erroneous version of the scientific method -- but still remotely related.
...
written by Bruno, March 19, 2008
I think gr8hands' point could be summed up as "unfalsifiable claims are not part of reality". Wish there were a simple way of explaining how utterly true that is.
Apart from that I often like to point out that suggestions of the sort "science can't explain this" is an implicit claim of clairvoyance, since it actually says "I foretell that science will never find the answer, not now, not at any point in the future". Wow.
...
written by Michelle Lyon, March 20, 2008
Send me 20 Euros ($31.60) through Paypal (starvingcsubstudent@gmail.com). I will mail to you a crayon-on-paper plate in any color you choose, that has every bit as much "energy" as Tesla's, and you will have the satisfaction of knowing your money is being put to better use.
...
written by alant, March 20, 2008
As I once attempted to suggest to JR: Reality is what each individual believes it to be. Since the experience sapiens mistake for reality is, in reality, merely their own individualised internal rendition. Which has been reconstituted by a mechanism reliant upon uniquely personalised data. For performing comparative analysis on, and the interpretation of, imprecise incoming material.
Unconvinced? Then ask yourself this. Is there one reality? If your reality leads you to believe that the answer is in the affirmative, then how could each individual lay claim to a different and therefore conflicting reality?
In regard to the case in point. Is reality for the Medium that she has randomly and innocently extracted the name “Dearlove” from some obscure recess of her mind? Or, is reality for the Medium that she has deliberately used the phase “dear love” as a cynical ploy in some money making charade? Is reality for the subject, that he has encountered a genuine demonstration of clairvoyance? Or, is reality for the subject that he has inadvertently misinterpreted the words “dear love” as “Dearlove”, and created an alternative reality based upon that?
As far as any perceived need to determine the nature of true reality is concerned, would not that depend on what the species is attempting to achieve? Appreciating purpose would assist an evaluation, of whether the exposure and abolition of personal reality would serve as help or hindrance in that endeavour.
...
written by Bruno, March 20, 2008
AlanT, could anyone survive merely on believing being fed? Reality really doesn't care a yip about what we believe it to be. If we believe the wrong thing about it, that is to our disadvantage. The scientific method is what we use to insure that what we believe about reality is at least fully consistent with it to any degree of relevance.
...
written by alant, March 20, 2008
Bruno, the best way to make my point is for me to ask you questions, and for you to answer on the basis of how you perceive reality. Until we reach a stage when you realise that your account contains a contradiction of your own making. As for your observation. Perhaps you should discuss that with a suicide bomber?
...
written by Flavour, March 20, 2008
alant, you seem to confuse the two terms 'reality' and 'perception'. Sure, each individual on this planet has a different perception of events, but reality is an absolute. You can't create your own 'reality'. There is only one.
...
written by alant, March 20, 2008
Bruno, and we gain our awareness, understanding, and beliefs concerning the nature of this one true reality from…?
Our flawed and uniquely individual perception of it.
...
written by alant, March 20, 2008
Sorry, Flavour...
...
written by Bruno, March 20, 2008
You haven't answered my question. Do you think that the subjectivity of perception affects reality or not? If not, how do you propose reducing the impact of subjective perception in order to gain understanding of reality that isn't tainted by it?
...
written by Flavour, March 20, 2008
Alant & Bruno, since we are infinitely imperfect entities, we can't measure, see, smell or even comprehend the true reality. There are simply too many unknown variables and too many possible interpretations. Interpretation is one of humans biggest flaws.

We are simply too limited and reality is simply too complex for any hope of total comprehension. We're doomed to get only a tiny glimpse of what is and what might be. This is one of the reasons why whooo-whooo should have no place in our world, as it only adds to the complexity and distracts from the real goal we as mankind should have: reach the highest level of comprehension and gain as much information about reality as possible in our lifetime.