<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Objectively Speaking</title>
		<description>Comments for Objectively Speaking at http://www.randi.org/site , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.randi.org/site</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:50:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22706</link>
			<description>That Inner Adult has an admirable leash on the Inner Brat.
I can't put my finger on it but there is something condescnding about skeptipagan's comment. - squareone</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@skeptipagan</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22672</link>
			<description>Yes, I believe this article is directed to the few snotty children who read this blog. Thank you for making your own point.  - Autahskeptic</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:49:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22652</link>
			<description>Who knows? Maybe getting them to think critically and to look at the evidence about [i]something[/i] will be the rational pebble that starts a skeptical avalanche in their minds.

If the avalanche ends up burying the Chalet of Creationism and permanently damaging the Ski Lift of Integrative Medicine, so much the better. - lytrigian</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:43:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22647</link>
			<description>I can't put my finger on it, but there's something patronizing, or condescending, about this article. As if you're trying to teach snotty kids how to behave. My analogy may be off a little, but I hope you get my point. Maybe it's your marketing experience, which, if we're honest, is usually a huge load of cow dung sprinkled with sugar. - skepticpagan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 09:58:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22646</link>
			<description>You aren't entirely wrong, kenhamer, he sorta did... but I don't blame him for it. I think Bruno makes a good point. Sometimes you have to pick your battles, unfortunately. - Morrigan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 08:49:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22645</link>
			<description>The question is not whether your audience should have been slapped, but rather did you change your presentation to accomodate their religious fanaticism? - kenhamer</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 07:58:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/1309-objectively-speaking.html#comment-22638</link>
			<description>Who knows, you might end up having taught them critical thinking and one or two might end up questioning creationism as a result. Clearly a better result than if you tried teaching them evolution theory with your audience questioning critical thinking as a result. - Bruno</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 05:15:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
