Comments for An Excellent and Responsible Response! at http://www.randi.org/site , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments http://www.randi.org/site Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:33:36 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-241 A link would be nice too. - dr pepper Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:44:52 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-208 I have talked with Randi, and I'm adding a note to the original article. - JeffWagg Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:52:17 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-193 I've been trying to get Washtenaw Community College to review their homeopathic feng shui curriculum for years! - DrMatt Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:19:29 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-173 Thanks for the response Jeff. Sorry to be a nuisance about it, I just feel the the NYCPB might have been unfairly treated. - cwniles Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:30:27 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-171 I'm sure there is an 'excellent and responsible' explanation for the confusion generated with the original article - and I'm confident Mr. Randi will clear it up when he has more time to focus his attention on the matter. In the meantime, score one for StudentCounsellor.com and all friends of reason! - grochon Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:06:05 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-164 I've contacted Randi about this. He's been out of the country for a bit (articles are written ahead of time in many cases.) - JeffWagg Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:03:29 +0100 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/296-an-excellent-and-responsible-response.html#comment-162 First, thats pretty cool Greg, one small step eh? Second. I am a bit miffed. There was considerable discussion regarding your original article and why there was any mention whatsoever of the NYCPB...the discussion went on for days with no response from JREF whatsover. Then, all the comments are wiped out in the new site launch, which is understandable, BUT, you then post this article which links back to the old article and still, the unexplained references to the NYCPB are there....I guess accuracy has lost some of it's importance around here lately.... - cwniles Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:49:01 +0100