Like it? Share it!

TAM! The Amaz!ng Meeting 2012 
Banner


Reason Rally Logo
 

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



Thoughts on Faith Healing PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Jeff Wagg   
Thursday, 17 June 2010 08:38

reindeerherdLast night, I was a guest on a Dallas-based radio talk show called "On the DL." The hosts, Don and Lane, were very friendly and I'm very happy they invited me on the show. The topic was so-called "faith healing," which was of particular interest in light of the radio station's proximity to evangelist Benny Hinn's corporate headquarters. (The phrase 'Benny Hinn's corporate headquarters' tells a story by itself.)

While there's no question that Randi should have been the one on the show, his lecture tour in Europe prevented that outcome. So, armed with my copy of his seminal book, The Faith Healers, I took their call and their questions. I found that I was more prepared than I needed to be.

While the hosts were obviously aware of Benny Hinn, they had apparently not heard of Peter Popoff, the poster boy for greedy televangelists. For those who haven't seen this clip from the Johnny Carson show, it's essential viewing. Randi and his cohorts completely destroyed Popoff, but as we know now, Popoff is back and making money again, albeit with slightly different and less impressive tricks.

During the interview, I explained the basics of faith healing. A person is called up on stage, "healed," and sent away. This happens in succession as a large audience observes, claps, and cheers. It appears to work. A woman may cast away her pills or a man may remove his leg braces and jump up an down. But when the "healed" are interviewed days later, it's obvious that their healing either was either taken away or temporary. How is this accounted for? Well, it's a problem of faith. Everyone saw the healing work, so if it's missing now, the healed person must not have had enough faith to be worthy of such a gift. Shame on them, and no, the donation is not refundable. The person once hopeful for a miraculous cure is reduced to even lower depths with injured pride and wallet added to their existing burden.

Sometimes cheap parlor tricks are employed, such as the "leg growing" trick, or plants in the audience who leap up from wheel chairs that were provided to them that day by the ministry. Having never needed wheel chairs before, they failed to bring their own.

After explaining this to the hosts, and relaying the crushing story of the boy to whom The Faith Healers is dedicated, a few calls started to come in. And I found I was able to predict them, nearly word for word.

"These people are evil, despicable. And while there are a lot of them out there, I know there are real healers and I've had relatives who've been healed. You don't hear about the real ones though, because they're not doing it for money."

And therein lies the problem. As Randi says, you can't prove reindeer don't fly but tossing one off of a building. You have to toss them all off, and even then it's possible they just decided not to fly. The JREF and other skeptical organizations can expose every faith healer in the world, and people will still point to that relative who was healed by that unnamed preacher. Why? Because to believe otherwise would be to call said relative either a liar or a fool. The truth is... they're probably both.

But that's OK. You see... I'm a fool. I've been fooled by many things, taken in by cons, and I've even lied about these things. I don't mean overt lying... I mean presenting as the truth something that wasn't true, simply because I believed it at the time. This is why Ben Franklin said: "There are no greater liars in the world than quacks — except for their patients." The fooled will make fools of others by spreading the false truth they believe. The faith healers know this, and depend upon it. There's no greater learning opportunity, and I've done my best to learn as well as I could. I'm much harder to fool these days, trust me. And I've added my voice to those like Randi who've learned the truth.

That skeptic's voice—the one that's instantly ready to change it's tune if proper evidence is presented—is drowned out by human nature. There is something in us, at least many of us, that wants to believe even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. I'm concerned that nothing short of evolution will change that. Fortunately, evolution is real, and by some accounts, accelerating.

As a coda to the faith healing segment on the show, another guest came on. She agreed that the likes of Hinn and Popoff were abhorrent, and then went on to explain how reiki is a true form of  spiritual healing. If the faith healers ever fall out of favor, there are many others waiting in the wings to take their place.

 

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (6)Add Comment
quote
written by jdodd, June 17, 2010
"There are no greater liars in the world than quacks — except for their patients."

That's fantastic. I'd hever heard that before. Thanks!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +9
...
written by Kitty, June 17, 2010
It's a tough battle. In a way skeptics have a wonderful sense of the importance of a human being. Not perhaps mankind, but each person being important. Because sometimes we just reach ONE person. We don't change human nature, we don't win the war... but we see each battle as important, and one person with a more open mind as a victory.

Jeff will HATE this (he's rather skeptic of the French) but it reminds me a tad of Charles DeGaulle and the French resistance during WWII. The majority of France really just didn't put up much of a fight during the war. All sorts of reasons can be given, one being the French are cowards...the other that the French losses in WWI (which was fought a great deal on French soil) were still too fresh a wound. It's hard to get all "rah rah" when the last war happened in your backyard.

Still, someone asked DeGaulle why the "Free French" should exsist at all, why didn't they just join the British Army or why did the few resistance fighters risk their lives when the rest of France didn't seem to care. And he said something like "Because I don't want history to say that every Frenchman was evil. The honor of France depends on us, even if this seems futile". (bad translation, but that's the point).

I think that applies to skeptics, even when we see astology has been around for so long and will continue to stay around. Even when ghost hunting shows abound and Radio Shack is making a killing on selling ghost hunting equipment. Even when you lose a friend because they don't want an atheist around their children.

Because doing it is the right thing to do. Maybe that is reason enough.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +15
...
written by garyg, June 17, 2010
And some "cures" are of non-existent conditions or diseases - the doctor made a mistake and whatever ailed the patient was self-limiting, so when the patient went to a healer about the time s/he was on the mend guess who got the credit?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Re:, Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by ClareZ, June 17, 2010
It is also true that sometimes things heal. The body is quite the busy beaver. Even cancers can disappear without interference. Not to be counted on and once discovered I would certainly want it treated, but it does happen. The human immune system has gotten us through many years of survival by doing just that kind of thing. Just because someone slapped your forehead just as your body was finally successfully dealing with the issue does not make it a miracle.

I have also heard people say they are "90%" healed. They still have the problem they just don't think it is as bad. Rather subjective. I have observed one in particular who has a lung problem and she certainly does not seem 90% improved to me.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
Another quote
written by kennypo65, July 07, 2010
On the subject of miracles: "Which is more likely, that the laws of Nature were circumvented, or that a man lied?"-Thomas Paine
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 June 2010 09:25