Like it? Share it!

Banner


Reason Rally Logo
 

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



My Sweet Lord — He's So Fine! PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Jeff Wagg   
Wednesday, 25 August 2010 14:28

This is a follow up to my article The Media Miracle.

Immediately after posting that article, I was contacted by Patrick Smith, who asked if his article influenced my article. What happened next was very interesting, so I'm going to tell the story in some detail.

As soon as Patrick sent that e-mail, I immediately looked at his article, and I thought... Wow, there's a lot of similarity here. But I hadn't read his article before I wrote mine, so how could that be? And then I remembered.

On the morning of August 18, 2010, I sleepily grabbed my iPad and browsed through two periodicals: USAToday and Slate, using their respective iPad apps. One of the featured articles in Slate was indeed Patrick's article. With horror, I thought "Holy cow, I've stolen his article."

And then I remembered what happened to George Harrison. There's a detailed account of the story here on Wikipedia, but the short of it is this: his 1970 song My Sweet Lord is a copy of the Chiffon's 1962 He's So Fine. The courts awarded damages to Ronnie Mack, the writer of He's So Fine, and the plagiarism was attributed to cryptonesia, wherein a memory presents itself as an original idea. If you listen to the video embedded above, you can see how very similar the two songs are, and why a compelling argument can be made that Harrison plagiarized.

But did he do so consciously? We can't ever know, but I think it's quite possible that he didn't, because a similar thing happened to me before. I used to run a website called Odd New England. It was a travel directory of unusual places to visit throughout the six northeastern states. While I was working on the Vermont section, I noticed a number of strange things relating to animals. For example, on Interstate 89, two giant whale tails rise out of a hill near the highway. As you near the waterfront, the buildings are festooned with life-size flying monkeys. And a few blocks from there, a rhino is bursting through the wall of a lamp shop. Given that these sites were in proximity and nice path could be drawn between them, I created a "strange animal" tour that people could follow.

Except that I didn't. Joe Citro did.

I read a lot of books to compile information for my site, and one of the best was Joe Citro's "Curious New England." In fact it's the best book for this type of thing. About a month after I wrote about "my" tour, I was dismayed to discover that nearly the same tour was in his book. My tour included more sites, but the concept of an animal tour was clearly in his book. I had certainly read that section, but when the idea for the tour occurred to me for my site, it seemed as though it was my own. This was a humbling and disappointing moment for me. After all, if I can't trust myself, who can I trust? I absolutely did not "plagiarize" Joe's work by sitting down with his book and copying his material and calling it my own. But I DID get the idea from him, forget its source, and then later re-attribute it to myself. It's very disconcerting that this type of thing can happen, but it does.

Can I prove that this was the course of events? No, not at all. In fact, it's only because this happened to me that I give credence to the idea that George Harrison may have developed the melody and chord progressions of My Sweet Lord thinking they were a completely original work. Had I not experienced this phenomenon myself, I'd be much more doubtful.

Now back to my article about "miracles." Did the same thing happen again? At first, I was convinced it had. I immediately wrote Patrick and apologized for not at least mentioning his article, and then I promised him I'd write this one explaining what happened. And after several day's of thought, I realize that I did not subconsciously copy his work and call it my own, though his article did influence me.

Here's what happened: When I read his article that sleepy morning, I didn't actually read it. I had literally just woken up, and I only skimmed through the first couple of paragraphs to get the main point, which is: "It's not a miracle that people survived, it's the result of people working hard." I briefly thought "I should mention this in an article" and then decided not to as I had something else I was working on. The following day, I noticed people tweeting what I thought was Patrick's article quite and bit, and I decided that it was worthy of mention. Except that it wasn't Patrick's, it was Alan Levin's USAToday article. My purpose was not to retell the story, but to praise the author for saying what so desperately needed to be said. And my first draft of the article was simply that – a brief retelling of the story followed by praise of Alan Levin for writing it.

While look for a YouTube'd newscast of the crash, I found the Nightline video, which made the same basic points that were in the Levin article, but with commentary that was really great to see. That rather messed up my story, so I changed it to be more inclusive and changed the title to "The Media Miracle." It was originally "The USAToday Miracle." And in fact, it was in the changes that my article began to look more like Patrick Smith's article.

So am I guilty of plagiarism? I don't think so, and Patrick certainly isn't claiming that I am. I didn't read his work completely, and I didn't look at it at all while I was writing my article. My original hypothesis of cryptonesia doesn't look accurate for many reasons, including the simplest one that the two article aren't really all that similar.

But I am guilty of changing the thrust my article and not doing the further research required to support this new thrust. If I had, I would have re-discovered Patrick's piece and included it. So, I apologize to Patrick Smith for not doing that and I thank him for bringing his article to my attention.

There is a post script to this story that bears mentioning. Patrick Smith and I exchanged a few more e-mails in which he asked where I went to high school. I told him St. John's Prep, in Danvers, MA. His reply: "I thought that was you."

It turns out that we were friends in high school, both graduating from the class of 1984. I didn't recognize his name because he changed it many years ago. He's the creator of the site AskThePilot.com, so we both have a connection to the travel industry even though this wasn't something we talked about in high school, and... we were both listening to the same obscure band (Human Sexual Response) last week.

Trackback(0)
Comments (19)Add Comment
...
written by Willy K, August 25, 2010
Imagine what the world would be like if today's recording technologies had been in use for the past four or five thousand years?
Would we be looking at a YouTube video of the trial of some Greeks around 100AD?

The Defendants:
"But your honor, we didn't realize that our JC mythology had been copyrighted by the Babylonians a few thousands years ago!"

The Judge:
"Guilty! Pay the clerk the $100 fine and don't do it again!"

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +7
...
written by Otara, August 25, 2010
I think its a lot easier to do this now with the news in that you can see numbers of news articles looking only slightly different, making attribution easy to mess up.

Checking your history to see which articles you've actually read for an article isnt that hard though. Something you've read 3 months ago is one one thing, 24 hours is a bit of a boo boo.

Otara
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
www.visionfromfeeling.com
written by VisionFromFeeling, August 25, 2010
Jeff, perhaps without realizing it, you have illustrated one of the fundamental aspects of many claims of the paranormal. Anything seen, read, or otherwise experienced, whether intensely with focus or subtly, is stored and available in our minds to be later used. For persons lacking a sense of critical thinking, and having a greater sense of imagination, they can assume that sometimes when they know something they "shouldn't have been able to know", it can be misinterpreted as something paranormal.

Thank you for a good example.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +7
...
written by MayorHardin, August 25, 2010
And here I thought that Harrison lost that case because he sneaked the "Hare Krishna" on the radio. The query "how many notes does it take to perhaps violate someone's copyright" gives the answer from My Sweet Lord - "three".
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Wonderful, Lowly rated comment [Show]
I believe George
written by kdv, August 25, 2010
I never had any problem believing that George Harrison's song was unconsciously plagiarised, because She's So Fine was quite a popular and widely known song, albeit some years before. It would be virtually guaranteed that at least some people, quite apart from the copyright holder, would recognise the strong similarities. Had Harrison wished, or needed, to copy somebody else's work, it would be a no-brainer to choose an obscure piece, preferably by somebody dead.

Plus, the Beatles were God... ask anybody over the age of about 50. I think a much more likely explanation is that the writer of She's So Fine had the power of precognition, and looked into the future, heard My Sweet Lord, and future-plagiarised it. smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Very odd, indeed
written by alcoolworld, August 25, 2010
I am writing a song in spanish as a form of word control practice, and formulated a melody this afternoon. It was quite nice and had a lilting wistful lope to it in 3/4 time and a syncopation on the middle beat. I hummed it and hummed. I was quite proud.
But then, I started to get suspicious that I had heard it somewhere before. I rode the bus home. It still hounded me...
Hound! it was Oh my darling, Clementine... one of huckleberry's favorites. Man, did I feel silly. But Lo, here not even 10 hours later A whole post about the very same thing!
Obviously We are both Clairvoyant... it is the only conclusion one can draw.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by marineboy, August 25, 2010
A similar thing happened to me.
A few years ago I thought of a joke, a fairly long and I thought quite funny joke, The details of which are not important. But I thought of it.
Many years later, whilst reading 'The Salmon of Doubt' by Douglas Adams, I was amazed to read 'my' joke.
I still have no memory of reading it before and I would have sworn that I hadn't, but as a huge fan of Douglas Adams, I must have.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by MadScientist, August 25, 2010
There's also the issue of Vanilla Ice pinching the riff of Queen's Under Pressure.

I've only had problems with deja vu - apparently I've been to some places multiple times and people even remember me, but I just can't recall being there before even though I can tell you many things about the location(s) which I couldn't have known without being there. On a few occasions I've stolen someone's work, but that someone always turned out to be me so I guess it's not really stealing.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
@MadScientist
written by Caller X, August 25, 2010
written by MadScientist, August 25, 2010
There's also the issue of Vanilla Ice pinching the riff of Queen's Under Pressure.


No, there isn't. It's called sampling. It's what rappers do, and on occasion they have to pay for it.

There is, however, the issue of you not crediting David Bowie as one of the writers. Pot, kettle.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by Marcus, August 25, 2010
There's plenty of research into the workings of human memory that shows that we frequently forget the source of information, whilst retaining the information itself. Not only is this likely to be a factor in the phenomenon described in this article, it is more broadly applicable to the concerns of the JREF. People remember reading about some woo or other, but because they forget the source they later give the information the same credence regardless of whether they first saw it in an academic journal or the HuffPo.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
concerned
written by Davis, August 26, 2010
Now you all have me worried about the latest song I'm writing. The working title is "I Saw it through the Grapevine"
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +5
Bowie wrote under pressure?
written by Bartmon, August 26, 2010
My understanding was that Bowie showed up for a recording session and they just happened to record the song with him, but bowie did not write it. Again, that is what I had read about the situation, I am not saying this is fact. Does anyone have definitive knowledge that Bowie contributed to the writing of Under Pressure?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -4
...
written by Obviously, August 26, 2010
There's a really great Neil Gaiman story--I forget what the title is, sadly--which he talks about in the foreword to one of his anthologies. He mentions that it all fell together suspiciously easily and when it was done, he felt certain he'd done what George Harrison had done. So he called up all his friends, all his author buddies, everyone he could think of, and read them the story and asked if he'd stolen it. They all said no, but apparently he is still nervous about putting it out there on the offchance that it was subconsciously plaigarized.

I've done this with illustration concepts. I'll get the idea for a piece and halfway into it get the sinking realization that I've ripped the concept off from someone smilies/sad.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
@Bartmon
written by Caller X, August 26, 2010
Bowie is one of several who has songwriting credit on the song, although he did not write the bass part that Vanilla Ice used. Going forward, I ask that you do your own research.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
'My' idea
written by tmac57, August 26, 2010
Years ago,right after the funeral of a friend,a group of his friend gathered at restaurant and talk turned as to what we could do to honor him.I came up with the idea of using a video camera to capture still photos that we all had of our friend (this was way before digital media),and make a video memory book with a music background,and make a copy for each of us and his family.We did this,and it was a beautiful tribute,but many years later,as we were recalling our friend,the subject came up about the video,and a woman friend claimed that she was the one to first come up with the idea.I didn't say anything in her presence,but later I told my wife "How do you like the fact that she took credit for my idea for the video?"My wife looked at me and said "Your idea? I was the one who thought of it first!"
Of course,it really was my idea,and I'm stickin' to it! smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
@tmac
written by Caller X, August 26, 2010
Years ago,right after the funeral of a friend,a group of his friend gathered at restaurant and talk turned as to what we could do to honor him.I came up with the idea of using a video camera to capture still photos that we all had of our friend (this was way before digital media),and make a video memory book with a music background,and make a copy for each of us and his family.We did this,and it was a beautiful tribute,but many years later,as we were recalling our friend,the subject came up about the video,and a woman friend claimed that she was the one to first come up with the idea.I didn't say anything in her presence,but later I told my wife "How do you like the fact that she took credit for my idea for the video?"My wife looked at me and said "Your idea? I was the one who thought of it first!"
Of course,it really was my idea,and I'm stickin' to it!


I dunno. That sounds like something David Bowie would have come up with. Of course, Elton John invented "Funeral For a Friend". (Yes, Bernie Taupin, blah, blah).
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by markbellis, August 29, 2010
I think it was in his Playboy interview that John Lennon said that Harrison could have gotten away with My Sweet Lord if he'd changed a few notes here and there, which would lend weight to the position that Harrison did not copy the song intentionally.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
It's cryptomnesia
written by gr8white, September 02, 2010
...not cryptonesia
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy