Like it? Share it!

TAM! The Amaz!ng Meeting 2012 
Banner


Reason Rally Logo
 

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



Christopher Hitchens Letter PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by James Randi   
Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:33

Christopher Hitchens was scheduled to appear at a conference of atheists this weekend, but had to cancel due to his illness. He sent this letter to be read in lieu of his appearance. I cannot add to what Chris has written here. It is beautiful, courageous, succinct, truthful, and so typical of his work. I despair of ever reaching such heights, with my amateur talents, and I once again celebrate the existence of this giant. Please read and distribute these words...  We're proud to have them appear here on SWIFT.

Dear fellow-unbelievers,

Nothing would have kept me from joining you except the loss of my voice (at least my speaking voice) which in turn is due to a long argument I am currently having with the specter of death. Nobody ever wins this argument, though there are some solid points to be made while the discussion goes on. I have found, as the enemy becomes more familiar, that all the special pleading for salvation, redemption and supernatural deliverance appears even more hollow and artificial to me than it did before. I hope to help defend and pass on the lessons of this for many years to come, but for now I have found my trust better placed in two things: the skill and principle of advanced medical science, and the comradeship of innumerable friends and family, all of them immune to the false consolations of religion. It is these forces among others which will speed the day when humanity emancipates itself from the mind-forged manacles of servility and superstition. It is our innate solidarity, and not some despotism of the sky, which is the source of our morality and our sense of decency.

That essential sense of decency is outraged every day. Our theocratic enemy is in plain view. Protean in form, it extends from the overt menace of nuclear-armed mullahs to the insidious campaigns to have stultifying pseudo-science taught in American schools. But in the past few years, there have been heartening signs of a genuine and spontaneous resistance to this sinister nonsense: a resistance which repudiates the right of bullies and tyrants to make the absurd claim that they have god on their side. To have had a small part in this resistance has been the greatest honor of my lifetime: the pattern and original of all dictatorship is the surrender of reason to absolutism and the abandonment of critical, objective inquiry. The cheap name for this lethal delusion is religion, and we must learn new ways of combating it in the public sphere, just as we have learned to free ourselves of it in private.

Our weapons are the ironic mind against the literal: the open mind against the credulous; the courageous pursuit of truth against the fearful and abject forces who would set limits to investigation (and who stupidly claim that we already have all the truth we need). Perhaps above all, we affirm life over the cults of death and human sacrifice and are afraid, not of inevitable death, but rather of a human life that is cramped and distorted by the pathetic need to offer mindless adulation, or the dismal belief that the laws of nature respond to wailings and incantations.

As the heirs of a secular revolution, American atheists have a special responsibility to defend and uphold the Constitution that patrols the boundary between Church and State. This, too, is an honor and a privilege. Believe me when I say that I am present with you, even if not corporeally (and only metaphorically in spirit...) Resolve to build up Mr Jefferson's wall of separation. And don't keep the faith.

Sincerely

Christopher Hitchens

Original link: Hitchens' address to American Atheists at Pharyngula 

Trackback(0)
Comments (21)Add Comment
...
written by bigjohn756, April 23, 2011
Christopher hates being called 'Chris'.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +9
...
written by Smiledriver, April 23, 2011
He hates the likes of Bill Donahue using it to pretend a level of informality he hasn't earned. I don't think he'd mind too much in Randi's case. Still, going forward Christopher, please.

Nice speech BTW. Here's to his outlasting his prognosis.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +12
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by Caller X, April 23, 2011
Beat me to it, bigjohn. Well done. Smiledriver, wrong. Couldn't be wronger. The familiar form of "Christopher" is "Hitch".
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by BillyJoe, April 23, 2011
popsaw,

"What is this 'argument' that nobody ever wins"

Death wants to take him but he doesn't want to go.
(Just like you might argue with your mommy about having to go to bed)

"Why does he consider death an enemy?"

Because he doesn't want to go yet.
(Just like you don't want to go to bed)

"Is it not for the greater good?"

The death of Christopher Hitchens at age 62 is not for the greater good.
(Just like you would not consider you dying soon to be for the greater good)

"Suppose this 'enemy' were conquered, would the world not become over populated very quickly?"

He's just arguing for more time.
(Just like you're not going to refuse treatment for your terminal illness when it strikes)

"I will miss the old demagogue if he passes but his contention with 'death' seems (understandably) more emotional than logical or intelligent."

Christopher Hitchens has his emotions pretty well in check as far as I can see.
(I hope you are the half the man he is when the Grim Reaper comes for you)

regards,
BillyJoe
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +20
Nice
written by goddess, April 23, 2011
Very well written . . . and I hope he gets well.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
I so admire Christopher Hitchens
written by goddess, April 23, 2011
Great man. Great mind.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
@ Billy Joe
written by popsaw, April 23, 2011
Christopher Hitchens has his emotions pretty well in check as far as I can see.
(I hope you are the half the man he is when the Grim Reaper comes for you)


The historian H. G. Wells said that a man’s greatness can be measured by ‘what he leaves to grow, and whether he started others to think along fresh lines with a vigor that persisted after him.
All the armies that ever marched, and all the navies that ever were built, and all the parliaments that ever sat, all the kings that ever reigned, put together have not affected the life of man upon this earth as powerfully as Chris
How could I possibly compete?



report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -5
Chris is wrong, Lowly rated comment [Show]
@popsaw
written by Caller X, April 25, 2011
You Soopaman! You just lay there, okay honey? I bring you warm towel.


The historian H. G. Wells said that a man’s greatness can be measured by ‘what he leaves to grow, and whether he started others to think along fresh lines with a vigor that persisted after him.
All the armies that ever marched, and all the navies that ever were built, and all the parliaments that ever sat, all the kings that ever reigned, put together have not affected the life of man upon this earth as powerfully as Chris
How could I possibly compete?


How could you compete? You could use proper punctuation and get his effing name right. And for JHVH1's sake, keep it in your pants. He's not dead yet.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
@Davis
written by Caller X, April 25, 2011
You make an interesting point. It's a shame that posts that are voted down by the mob are hidden, according to one of the moderators "to allow users to control content" in other words if enough members of the mob don't like what you say, they don't have to look at it. Hypocritical to say the least.

And who are you to say we shouldnt "strengthen the herd" by removing the weaker, sicker ones among us?


If you're saying McVeigh should have been culled from the herd early on, I sort of agree, but the question is when? When he was a maladjusted teen, when he failed Special Forces Selection, when he became an itinerant hat salesman?

I think it's in my self-interest for as many people as possible to belief that "It is our innate solidarity, and not some despotism of the sky, which is the source of our morality and our sense of decency" because one day that belief may prevent me from being culled from the herd.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
@caller x, Lowly rated comment [Show]
@caller x
written by Davis, April 25, 2011
Oh, and I dont mind my posts getting semi-deleted. Studies show that these are read much more than every post except the first one.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -4
back@davis
written by Caller X, April 25, 2011
"Studies show..." That's a good one!

In a March, 1996, interview with Time magazine, McVeigh professed his belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."[83] In the 2001 book American Terrorist, McVeigh stated that he did not believe in Hell and that science is his religion.[86][87] In June, 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News claiming to be an agnostic.[88] Before his execution, McVeigh took the Catholic sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick.[89]


To sum up, not an atheist.

If, from an athiest's standpoint, I want government to cull out the sick and unhealthy of our population then it must be accepted, especially if the majority agree.


"especially if the majority agree"? Meaning you think the government should do what you want even if the majority disagrees?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
@davis back
written by Caller X, April 25, 2011
"Studies show..." That's a good one!

In a March, 1996, interview with Time magazine, McVeigh professed his belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."[83] In the 2001 book American Terrorist, McVeigh stated that he did not believe in Hell and that science is his religion.[86][87] In June, 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News claiming to be an agnostic.[88] Before his execution, McVeigh took the Catholic sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick.[89]


So not actually an atheist, so there goes that part of your argument.

If, from an athiest's standpoint, I want government to cull out the sick and unhealthy of our population then it must be accepted, especially if the majority agree.


So you're saying that the government should do what you want, "especially if the majority agree"? That implies that the government should do what you want even if the majority don't agree. Note that I am emulating your incorrect noun-verb agreement.

The person who says "I want government to cull out the sick and unhealthy of our population" is exactly the sort of person I want culled out of the herd. I want government to monitor and correct your sexual practices. Government does such a wonderful job at such things.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by Johnnie K., April 25, 2011
Thank God I'm atheist.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -5
@caller x
written by Davis, April 25, 2011
OK, lets say I believe it would be better for society to exterminate terminally ill citizens and 51% of people agree with that. How would you respond?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -9
Oh Davis
written by Caller X, April 25, 2011
I was saying that an atheist has no right to question anyone's views on how to make society better.


I sort of agree, except I phrase it differently:

I was saying that a colored has no right to question anyone's views on how to make society better.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
@caller x
written by Davis, April 25, 2011
We're talking about worldviews, not race. However, I do enjoy the fact that atheists are only about 3% of the population. Guess that does qualify you as a fringe minority group. (And dont forget, agnostics are just atheists who are cowards)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -10
...
written by Reverend Anaglyph, April 25, 2011
@ Caller X:

Thankfully, most atheists have highjacked Judeo-Christian principles because they know they truly are the most beneficial


Any worthwhile Judeo-Christian 'principles' are, for the most part, just plain common sense. Religious people are happy, as usual, to take the credit for purloining things that are of value and mighty quick to disown things that aren't. Religion has no monopoly on morality, as much as you might like to think it does.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +9
...
written by Bruno, April 25, 2011
2nded. Actually, religions recruit common sense (or innate) moral values in order to sound more plausible. Makes potential converts hum in agreement. "Well if they say I shouldn't kill my brother (and especially that my brother shouldn't kill me) and that I shouldn't ---- my mother (well ain't that just eeewww!), I suppose the rest of what they're saying's bound to be true too. Hey Padre count me in!"
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated on Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:38