Like it? Share it!

TAM! The Amaz!ng Meeting 2012 
Banner


Reason Rally Logo
 

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



"Pox Party" Promoters Now Putting Dangerous Contagions In U.S. Mail PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by David Gorski   
Monday, 07 November 2011 14:39

Normally, I'm all over stories like this, but somehow I'm a bit late to the party, having been scooped by Tara, Mike the Mad Biologist, The Biology Files, Todd, and probably several others whom I've missed. I don't really care.

Regular readers of this blog and anyone who's ever followed the anti-vaccine movement more than superficially have probably heard of pox parties. These are, yes, parties where parents who don't want to vaccinate their children against chickenpox, hoping for "natural immunity," expose their children who have never had chickenpox to children with active chickenpox in order to intentionally infect them with the disease. (Thanks, Mom and Dad, for a couple of weeks worth of misery and intense itching and a small chance of serious complications!) Although there might have been a weak rationale for such activities back before there was a vaccine for chickenpox, today pox parties are about as dumb a concept as I can think of and only make sense in the context of equally idiotic anti-vaccine pseudoscience, and apparently, as is the case with many idiotic things, has co-opted Facebook and other discussion forums as a means of getting like minded (if you can call what is behind this a "mind") together for purposes of inflicting misery on their children. One such page even has a Quack Miranda-style warning:

It is explicitly expressed that, regardless of the beliefs of the group moderator or its members, the group is not responsible for the outcome of the connections made. This group is not intended to give medical advice, speak as a medical authority, or cause children to contract any illness. Parents who do so on this board, do so at their own risk and without the advise or recommendation of the leadership of this group.

Which is, of course, a lie so obvious that one wonders why the moderators even bothered.

Some proudly display pictures of pox on children's limbs. Others are even so proud of their "efforts," that they proudly post pictures of them on their blogs, with captions such as "The little people enjoying each other, playing, and getting exposed" and "Although it sounds awful, we certainly hope the exposing worked!" I can only shake my head and respond that "it" doesn't just "sound" awful. It is awful. True, major complications are fairly uncommon but they can be quite serious, with all of this being done in the name of being "natural" and avoiding those evil vaccines. It turns out that some parents, apparently having difficulty finding children with active chickenpox in their area (thanks to the aforementioned evil vaccine, no doubt), are mailing the virus to each other:

Doctors and medical experts are concerned about a new trend taking place on Facebook. Parents are trading live viruses through the mail in order to infect their children.

The Facebook group is called "Find a Pox Party in Your Area." According to the group's page, it is geared toward "parents who want their children to obtain natural immunity for the chicken pox."

On the page, parents post where they live and ask if anyone with a child who has the chicken pox would be willing to send saliva, infected lollipops or clothing through the mail.

Parents also use the page to set up play dates with children who currently have chicken pox.

Medical experts say the most troubling part of this is parents are taking pathogens from complete strangers and deliberately infecting their children.

One concern is that they are sending the virus through the mail.

Here's video of the local Arizona news report:

Again, I can't begin to describe how reckless this is. It's also highly illegal—a federal offense. I know of what I speak, because I personally have had to ship viruses and DNA plasmids through the mail. The reason was when I changed jobs about four years ago and was in the process of moving my laboratory to a new institution. I had a lot of adenoviral constructs. Varicella virus falls under the same sorts of rules as adenovirus. There are very specific rules for shipping. Tara explains quite nicely some of the requirements, among which is that there are very specific labeling requirements for the package to indicate what pathogens are inside. In fact, I found out the hard way just how rigorous and complex the labeling requirements were when a couple of the packages were returned because, as much as we tried to follow the letter of the regulations, we had somehow missed something in the labeling and paperwork. At that point I even briefly flirted with the idea of loading the samples up in my car and taking them myself when I hit the road to my new location. I quickly abandoned that notion, realizing that that, too, would be illegal and, worse, potentially dangerous. What if I got in a car crash along the way? So instead, we checked, double checked, and triple checked our packaging and paperwork and sent it again. This time, it went through, as we hadn't missed any of the requirements.

As Mike the Mad Biologist points out, this is little different from bioterrorism, other than in intent. For one thing, the parents doing this seem utterly oblivious to the potential danger to the postal workers or workers at FedEx, UPS, or other shipping company that they use to send these biohazards. One also wonders if the parents use anything approaching proper technique to insert their "gifts" into the packages so that they don't get it on their fingers and thus contaminate the outside of the package. In any case, should the package be damaged or should the baggy fail, so much for containment, and anyone who comes into contact with the package is at risk. That's why there are so many federal regulations about shipping biohazardous substances across state lines. Indeed, when it was pointed out that shipping biohazards like bodily fluids from an individual infected with varicella across state lines is a federal offense, this was the reaction:

A Facebook post reads, "I got a Pox Package in mail just moments ago. I have two lollipops and a wet rag and spit." Another woman warns, "This is a federal offense to intentionally mail a contagion."

Another woman answers, "Tuck it inside a zip lock baggy and then put the baggy in the envelope :) Don't put anything identifying it as pox."

The level of irresponsibility and lack of concern for fellow human beings is staggering. As Todd points out, it's not just varicella that might be in there? How does anyone know that there aren't other pathogens in there? They are utterly self-absorbed, selfish, and lack concern for anyone but themselves and their own family. Indeed, look at the interview with the first mother in the video; she openly discusses sending pox through the mail and doesn't seem to think it's a big deal, all the while rambling on about how it's the parents' "choice." The second mother, when confronted by a reporter, out and out lies about what was on her Facebook page, denying that she ever sent pox through the mail. It's a mindset that was perfectly described as a Me! Mine! Mommy mindset that boils down to, basically, the right to be selfish.

But it's worse than that. Near the end of the report from the local CBS affiliate above, there is a post from a parent looking for measles, which is much more dangerous than chickenpox. Her reason? This:

Dad is threatening to take it to court and getting exposed is the only way not to get the vaccine without possibly losing custody.

If you want an example of how far the irrational fear of vaccines will drive some people, you have no further to look than this story. At the risk of being too "strident" or "nasty" or "uncivil," I can say unequivocally that what they are doing is, in my opinion, child abuse and that I hope that the feds come down on them like a ton of bricks for violating federal law and endangering everyone who comes into contact with their little "pox packages."

 

David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS, is breast cancer surgeon interested in applying science and skepticism to implausible medical claims. He is the managing editor of Science-Based Medicine, and serves on the advisory board of the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Trackback(0)
Comments (12)Add Comment
Selfish and dangerous
written by Orpheus, November 07, 2011
"The level of irresponsibility and lack of concern for fellow human beings is staggering."

I'm afraid this one sentence truly sums up the entire anti-vaccine movement. While deliberately and proudly ignoring all scientific evidence, these people are taking it upon themselves to jeopardize others in the society in which they live.

I would hope (although seriously doubt) that some form of criminal charges could be filed against the people "tricking" the system to distribute their disease. Although if charges were ever filed, I would assume the anti-vaccine folk would just use that as one more piece of evidence that "big pharma controls the country" and they're just the persecuted visionaries.

And the poor children who don't have a say in this... parents should protect their children. This report truly turned my stomach to see the depths to which ignorance has pervaded our culture.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +14
...
written by William, November 07, 2011
It appears the Facebook page was taken down, so I could not go on and voice my opinion about how stupid an idea this would be.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
Just great no really fantastic
written by Xiphos, November 07, 2011
Any old ding bat can have a human child without regards to what they do to that child yet it takes licensing to own a dog. And "heaven" help anybody that did something as unconscionable as this to an animal, yet these freaks go blithely on their merry way putting responsible parents children at risk, thus negating those parents "choice". Lunatics is what these smiley no good idiots are.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +10
...
written by CNS100, November 07, 2011
I suffered through both chicken pox and measles as a grade schooler -- I still recall how awful this was. And I still bear scars from the pox, maybe 50 years later. These lunatics ought to face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and for child abuse, and civil suits as well. Even if one is scared of vaccines and refuses them, intentionally spreading disease in this fashion is assault.

(BTW, I wasn't vaccinated because the vaccinations hadn't yet been developed -- my parents were both M.D.'s, quite sane, and made sure I had vaccinations that were available, for which I'm very grateful. No polio here!)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +7
Suprised
written by Miss.Fantome, November 08, 2011
Hi
I just want to say that exposing one's child to chickenpox is not uncommon here in Sweden. We do not vaccinate our children against chickenpox. Parents here try to get their children exposed to chickenpox by visiting families where the child/children has it. Getting it as a child is better than as an adult. I don't know why we don't vaccinate our children against chickenpox here, maybe it is because parents can stay home with sick children without losing money. Or maybe there is some other reason. I got chickenpox when I was about 6 years old, and I don't have any visible scars from it, and I don't remember being that sick either.

And just to be clear, as far as I know, there is no "anti-vax" movement here in Sweden (and if there is, I don't think it is big), we vaccinate our children against: diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, polio, Hib, pneumococcus, measels, mumps and rubella.

If anyone wants to read more about Sweden and vaccination, I can post some links.

Since English isn't my first language, I hope I have not offended anyone in anyway. And I hope you all can understand what I have written. smilies/smiley.gif

Best Regards.
Kajsa
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Risk of shingles a/o PHN
written by sibtrag, November 08, 2011
When looking into the state of vaccination around the world (see Kajsa above...some other European countries are also not giving chickenpox vaccination universally) I noted that there were some studies that showed a statistically significant increase in shingles in vaccinated populations. Any idea whether this has been confirmed or not? Given the much more severe problems of contracting infection as an adult, it may be considered rational to take a small risk now to avoid a possibly larger risk later.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
PS
written by sibtrag, November 08, 2011
Of course, that doesn't justify sending unmarked pathogens in the mail.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Chickenpox consequences
written by levinjb, November 08, 2011
According to Miss.Fantome Sweden does not vaccinate against chickenpox (why not?) and it is considered normal to try to have children exposed to it because the disease is less serious for them than for adults. It is my understanding that the chickenpox virus often lingers in the body and may cause an outbreak of shingles in middle-to-late adult life. (I myself had chickenpox at around 20 or 21 and have not in the ensuing decades contracted shingles.) This is contrary to what sibtrag writes above.

I too would be interested in the occurrence of shingles in countries like Sweden in comparison to vaccinating countries like the US.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Re: Chickenpox consequenses
written by Miss.Fantome, November 08, 2011
Well, I don't know why we don't vaccinate our children against chickenpox. But I do have some guesses:
1. Chickenpox is not a serious disease for healthy children, therefore it is not necessary to vaccinate against it.
2. We don't have to pay for vaccinating our children, so all children get vaccinated for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, polio, Hib, pneumococcus, measles, mumps and rubella. This is then paid for by taxes. So I guess chickenpox wasn't included in that package since it is not too serious.

But, we do vaccinate people who are older than 12 years (and adults), that has not had chickenpox as children. People who belong to risk groups, such as patients about to get cancer treatment, also gets the vaccine.

Best Regards,
Kajsa
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by bigjohn756, November 08, 2011
It's a good thing there isn't a cancer vaccine yet or these idiots would be trying to infect their kids with cancer just to avoid using a vaccine.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
@bigjohn
written by sibtrag, November 09, 2011
There is a cancer vaccine. It's the HPV vaccine. And it is controversial. But I haven't heard of people holding parties for their kids to have intercourse just to spread HPV.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by Beer Monster, November 17, 2011
Firstly, I am horrified that some people think it is OK to send a virus through the US postal system without using the proper controls and safeguards. Any postal staff without immunity (natural or vaccine) are put at risk by their reckless attitudes as shingles is nasty!

Secondly I am pro-vaccine myself, both of my children have had all their jabs and I am always left puzzled by the attitudes of anti-vaccine parents who leave their children unprotected against really serious diseases like polio or diptheria based on spurious, unscientific 'claims' that vaccines cause autism or somesuch.

However I live in the UK and like Sweden we do not vaccinate aginst chickenpox, probably for the same reasons suggested by Miss.Fantome and immunity comes from exposure to chickenpox, usually during childhood. I had it as a child, one of my children has had chickenpox and while I understand there is a very small chance of complications that could be said about everything from minor dental surgery to your child being prescribed antibiotics, would you refuse either of those???? You have to weigh potential risk against potential benefit which is exactly what aniti-vaccine parents dont do properly.

My point here though is about pox-parties and some of the attitudes about them that have been expressed. In a country with no vaccine I feel that exposure to the virus in childhood (when there is less chance of complications) is better than nothing. The next time someone I know fetches up with chickenpox I will be round there with my youngest child, who has never had the chickenpox!!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -2

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 November 2011 11:23