The Amazing Meeting 2014

Like it? Share it!

Sign up for news and updates!

Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

Please leave this field empty

Login Form

Remembering The AntiPope PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. Romeo Vitelli   

Attending the 2012 Amazing Meeting in Las Vegas was an amazing experience (hence the name, presumably). Not only did it allow me to interact with personal idols such as James Randi, Steve Novella, D.J. Grothe, and Ben Radford, but I was also able to bring myself up to date on skeptical matters around the world.   In addition to the various festive occasions was one somber event commemorating the various members of the skeptical community who had died in the past year.   Along with familiar names such as Christopher Hitchens and Robert Buckman, there were also well-known members of the JREF forum including Jeffrey A. Wenning, Peter Johansson and Brian Isbell.   As well, the In Memoriam presentation also provided more unconventional names for us to remember. That included a range of unique, and at times bizarre, characters whose activities brought them to the attention of skeptics everywhere. Along with the various cult leaders, “alternative medicine” mavens and cryptozoologists who died recently, one name stood out for me.   Then again, how often do you commemorate the death of an anti-pope? Not to mention a Canadian one?

The man who would later declare himself as Pope Gregory XVII likely didn’t have such grandiose ambitions at first. Born Jean-Gaston Tremblay in 1928, his early childhood in Quebec likely immersed him in the “proper” Catholic tradition. Available records on whether he was ever actually ordained as a Catholic priest seem scarce (aside from his own biography, of course). Inspiring people with his charismatic manner, Father Tremblay founded his own religious community near Mont-Tremblant, Quebec which he named the Congregation of Jesus and Mary.  That this community lacked any kind of official blessing from the Catholic Church seemed but a technicality.

The real story likely began earlier in France when a newly-ordained priest named Michel Colin announced in 1936 that Jesus Christ had appeared and ordained him as a bishop.   Based on his religious vision, the charismatic Colin managed to found a new religious community that he named the Order of the Mother of God.   Since France has a long history of religious visionaries, with numerous claimed visitations by the Virgin Mary, “Bishop” Colin’s mission attracted numerous followers.   Inspired by his own success, Michel Colin declared that Jesus Christ had designated him as the new pope and he took the name of Clement XV.

As you probably might expect, the Vatican was not amused by Pope Clement XV’s antics.   Pope Pius XII formally defrocked Michel Colin in 1951 and then publicly excommunicated him.   In an unusual step, Colin was officially declared a vitandus excommunicate, which basically meant that all Catholics were ordered not to associate with him in any way (except for family members).   Very similar to the shunning practiced by many religious groups, the vitandus ruling is rarely imposed by the Catholic Church except in extreme cases (such as with heretics deemed especially dangerous to Church teachings).

Although being shunned by the Church cost Michel many of his supporters, he still managed to keep his community going. In 1961, he and Jean-Gaston Tremblay met for the first time and, despite Colin’s own excommunicated status, they decided to merge their two religious communities. Colin brought many of his remaining followers to Quebec although his movement also continued in France. The new, expanded community changed its name to the Apostles of Infinite Love (a.k.a. Order of the Magnificat) and Father Tremblay was formally consecrated a bishop by Pope Clement XV.

The expanded community managed to flourish, largely due to dissatisfaction with the official Catholic Church over changes linked to the Second Vatican Council. There also appeared to be growing friction between Michel Colin and Jean-Gaston Tremblay over who would have ultimate control of their joint community.  By 1968, Tremblay declared himself to be Pope Gregory XVII and Colin grudgingly accepted his authority (although it took him more than a year to do it).

Following Michel Colin’s death in 1974, his followers split up into warring factions and pretty well vanished from public notice.   That left Jean Gaston Tremblay in absolute control over his Quebec community.   While he still claimed the name of Pope Gregory XVII there were actually two other claimants to the name and the title of pope that went with it.   Spanish antipope, Clement Dominguez y Gomez proclaimed himself Pope Gregory XVII in 1968 after seeing a vision of the Virgin Mary in the small Spanish village of El Palmar de Troya. His faction became known as the Palmarian Catholic Church and still has thousands of followers (Gregory XVII died in 2005 although Pope Gregory XVIII is the current head of the Palmarians).   The other claimant to the title, Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, was declared Pope Gregory XVII at least one extremist Catholic group that disputed the last four papal elections.   Although Cardinal Siri never actually supported the extremists (who called themselves Sirianists), whatever legitimacy the extremists had ended when the Cardinal died in 1989.

As for our own Canadian antipope, Jean Gaston Tremblay, the exact nature of his control over his followers and what was actually happening in his religious community became the focus of considerable controversy for decades.   With more than five hundred members in Canada, the United States, and South and Central America, the main source of converts appeared to be conservative Catholics unhappy about Vatican reforms.   What little is publicly known about Tremblay’s doctrine appeared to be focused on the coming end of the world. According to one former member who had fled the community after thirty years, “They were saying the end of the world was coming and true days of darkness were coming and we had so many hours and days to join”. The group had more than 900 followers at its peak and practiced total abstinence as well as communal living with all worldly possessions being surrendered to the community before joining.   Boys and girls were kept in strict sexual seclusion and complaints of physical and sexual abuse became common during the 1980s.

As a result of the sexual abuse allegations, Tremblay became the focus of numerous police probes including a high-profile police raid on the St. Jerome monastery in 1999. More than twenty children were removed and as least four senior members, including Tremblay, were later charged with sexual abuse alleged to have occurred between 1966 and 1985.   Although Tremblay was actually in France when the raid occurred, he turned himself into the police two weeks after a Canada-wide warrant was issued for his arrest.   It would take two years of legal wrangling before the Crown finally dropped all charges against Tremblay and his supporters due to problems with the testimony provided by the children.   The children at the centre of the case were never returned to the community’s care and at least nine of them were returned to the United States since their parents were in Canada illegally.

Not that Jean Gaston Tremblay’s legal problems ended there. Despite repeated lawsuits and additional criminal charges, including one former member who filed a $2.5 million dollar lawsuit over allegations of abuse, Jean Gaston Tremblay managed to stay out of jail.   He also stayed in firm control of his religious community although poor health forced him to turn over day-to-day operations to his supporters.   Although former members condemned the Canadian and Quebec governments for allowing Tremblay’s followers to continue operating, the community has managed to avoid any new criminal charges.

With Jean Gaston Tremblay’s death on December 31, 2011, there has been intense speculation over what will happen with his community and whether a new pope will be appointed.   Did Tremblay appoint a successor or will the religious community he controlled for more than four decades split into factions in the same way that Michel Colin’s movement did?   For now, the saga of the Canadian antipope remains unresolved.


Comments (3)Add Comment
Papal elections
written by Wave, August 03, 2012
The process for determining the Bishop of Rome was, for the first millennium, nearly as chaotic as the one in Quebec described above. The cardinals were not assigned that duty until 1059. Prior to that time we have no idea how many of them came to the office. Of the popes that we know about some were elected, some were appointed by kings or emperors, and some fought their way to the throne. As recently as the twentieth century Donus II (who apparent did not exist at all) and Cletus/Anacletus (the same guy) were removed from the list. Incidentally, mosaics of both of the fictitious pair are still on display in St. Paul's Outside the Walls. I saw and photographed them in October.

The first known antipope, Hippolytus, was also allegedly the first person to use the term "catholic" to describe the Church. His description of Pope Zephyrinus and Pope Callixtus I makes fascinating reading. He is today considered a saint, as are both of the popes that he despised.

The Siri Thesis was largely promulgated by Malachi Martin, Art Bell's favorite priest, who publicly claimed that Siri had been elected in both 1958 and 1963. Martin reported that Siri was "afraid" to accept the nomination. Siri himself said this about it: "I am bound by the secret. This secret is horrible. I would have books to write about the different conclaves. Very serious things have taken place. But I can say nothing."
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Just wondering...
written by Zoroaster, August 04, 2012
Does anybody know why so many Popes / anti-popes are choosing to be Gregory XVII? Other names are just as likely right?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
written by Wave, August 05, 2012
Newly elected popes often name themselves after admirable predecessors. Pope Benedict XVI chose his name because he respected Benedict XIV an Benedict XV, who were both intellectuals.

Two very famous popes were named Gregory. Gregory I (the Great) and Gregory VII (Hildebrand) were both highly disciplined monks who instituted many "reforms." Gregory I (590-604) removed civilian managers from Church properties and replaced them with priests. He took a hard line with civilian leaders and even expected them to implement his decisions for him. He even had the temerity to appoint a tribune to run the garrison in Naples.

Gregory VII (1073-1085) is most famous for excommunicating the Holy Roman Emperor and then for requiring him to stand barefoot in the snow for three days and nights before forgiving him. His reign ended in catastrophe when the Normans sacked Rome.

The last pope named Gregory (1831-1846) was #XVI. He campaigned against free speech and the free press. Believe it or not, he banned railroads and artificial gas lighting from the Papal States, an autonomous country in central Italy ruled by the pope from 800-1870.

So, my guess is that the name Gregory is attractive to "papabili" who want to return the Church to the days when the pope was an autocrat or at least to top-down management.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.