The Amazing Meeting 2014

Like it? Share it!

Sign up for news and updates!

Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

Please leave this field empty

Login Form

Last Week At Science-Based Medicine PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. Harriet Hall   

Here is a recap of the stories that appeared last week at Science-Based Medicine, a multi-author skeptical blog that separates the science from the woo in medicine.

NIH funds training in behavioral intervention to slow progression of cancer by improving the immune system (James Coyne) The NIH is funding training in psychoneuroimmunological interventions for cancer, questionable treatments based on flawed studies. This highlights the pseudoscience and heavy-handed politics in this field. There is no credible evidence that any psychosocial intervention reduces risk of cancer recurrence or improves survival.  

Andrew Weil/AAFP Article Rejected by Slate (Harriet Hall) Slate magazine asked Dr. Hall to write an article criticizing the selection of Andrew Weil as keynote speaker for the American Academy of Family Physicians scientific assembly (akin to asking an astrologer to speak at an astronomy meeting). The text of that article is presented, followed by an account of the editorial concerns that led to its rejection.  

Cyborg Therapeutics (Steven Novella) There are promising new developments in the use of computer controlled robotics for therapeutic purposes. A robotic exoskeleton for paraplegics allows them to sit, stand, and walk. It is muscle-activated, but brain-activated applications are in the works.  

CAM and Creationism: Separated at Birth? (Jann Bellamy) Arguments in support of creationism/creation science/intelligent design and CAM have much in common: the same logical fallacies, sub-par thinking, and lack of good science. Numerous examples are presented.  

The Light Fantastical (Mark Crislip) Many claims are made for treating everything from allergies to cancer by removing small quantities of blood, “irradiating” it with UV light or lasers, and returning it to the body. This amounts to a homeopathic application of light. There is no evidence to support its effectiveness, and the rationales presented for possible mechanisms are implausible.

Comments (1)Add Comment
written by Michael Dawson, November 05, 2012
It's immensely depressing how far gone our runaway for-profit medical system is, not to mention our cowardly, money-grubbing for-profit journalism. The comments on Dr. Hall's post at SBM are as telling as Andrew Weil's thievery. These alt-medicine people are as greedy as the big drug companies they claim to despise, and less respectful of reality. These neo-quacks just want in on the money action in our ailing, disinformed, and hyper-hypochondriac "health" culture.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +5

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.