The Amazing Meeting 2014

Like it? Share it!

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



Unidentified Flying Obscurity PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Brian Thompson   

As reported in Britain’s The Telegraph this week, a number of organizations devoted to investigating unidentified flying objects are either disbanding completely or turning their attention to other paranormal pursuits. Said Dave Wood of the Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena: “It is certainly a possibility that in ten years time, [UFOs] will be a dead subject.”

 

Once, I was a true believer that extraterrestrials were visiting our planet. Compared to, say, believing that leprechauns are hoarding their gold at the end of a rainbow, alien visitation is downright plausible. Mathematically speaking, there’s a good chance other worlds speckled throughout the universe have incubated intelligent life. Maybe some of those worlds have dodged asteroids long enough for their inhabitants to become technologically capable of traveling between the stars. Maybe that’s a Star Trek fantasy, but it’s far less fantastical than another Star Trek notion: that the primary fashion of all Milky Way species is some variation of a polyester jumpsuit.


So, why is interest in UFOs waning? According to Wood, his organization’s open UFO investigations have dropped 96% over the past 25 years. This despite the fact that millions of people walk around every day with point-and-shoot cameras built into the phones they carry in their pockets and purses. If a flying saucer from Zeta Reticuli were to zoom past the White House, it’s a good bet there would be crystal clear, 1080p video posted to YouTube within minutes. And it’s an even better bet that at least one of the comments will simply read, “Meh.”


The ubiquity of digital photography has led to a few interesting discoveries. For example, we now know that weddings, where just about everyone is peering through a viewfinder, suffer from a plague of fainting spells. This is the kind of hilarious documentation that would have been far more difficult to capture in the analog days. Yet compelling UFO photos and videos are on the decline, and so is interest in them.


It’s possible the aliens have simply become bored with us and moved on to civilizations with more entertaining reality TV. But David Clark, UFO adviser to Britain’s National Archives, believes this decline is not because of an overall decrease in UFO sightings, but because the huge influx of obviously fake or easily explained photos and videos has turned more and more people into UFO skeptics. “There are so many fakes on YouTube and elsewhere,” Clark says, “it would be easy to dismiss the whole subject out of hand.”


When all of us are touching up vacation shots in Photoshop and using iMovie to cut together footage of our babies dancing, we’re becoming more and more savvy about image manipulation. Faking a UFO photo has always been pretty simple, but now laypeople are more capable of spotting a hoaxer’s techniques. Though, as our recent UFO photo contest proved, the best fakes still require talent.



While interest in UFOs may not be able to sustain several organizations devoted to their study, we’ll probably never see an end to sightings of strange lights or objects in the sky. But according to The Telegraph, Clark fears that any potential valid UFO photo in the future might not receive the attention it deserves in these disinterested times. He compares this possibility to throwing the baby out with the bathwater. (Side note: It’s terrifying to think that this may have been a common enough practice to become a cliché.) Maybe so. But crowd-sourced skepticism, while not perfect, can only be a positive thing for anyone interested in UFOs. If a photo of an alien spacecraft is real, it should hold up to as much scrutiny as both experts and amateurs want to pile upon it.

 

 

Brian Thompson is the Outreach Coordinator for the James Randi Educational Foundation


Trackback(0)
Comments (5)Add Comment
...
written by RobertoDebunker, November 06, 2012
I wouldn't read too much into this. That group "Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena" is mostly a ghost-hunting group. They have no significant following or influence on the UFO scene, and this guy Wood is a UFOlogical unknown. None of the major UFO groups are buying into this.

UFO belief is as strong as ever, however the emphasis is shifting from UFO groups and publications to electronic media. Most of today's UFO buffs get their thrills from cable TV shows like "UFO Chasers" and "Ancient Aliens," from UFO podcasts, websites and Facebook pages, etc.

Robert Sheaffer
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by Steel Rat, November 06, 2012
Maybe that’s a Star Trek fantasy, but it’s far less fantastical than another Star Trek notion: that the primary fashion of all Milky Way species is some variation of a polyester jumpsuit.


Or that all aliens are humans with shit on their heads.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by Wzrd1, November 08, 2012
I've witnessed plenty of UFO's. They rapidly were reclassified as identified though. smilies/smiley.gif
I've also witnessed "real" UFO's, as in classified military aircraft flying on missions. Remarking on the neat new aircraft (or UAV), the response by senior personnel was, "you didn't see anything, it doesn't exist".
Or, in plain English, officially, to those without a security clearance and need to know, it doesn't exist (aka John Q. Public).
The SR-71 and U-2 development platforms, HUGE numbers of UFO reports during that period and much of the period of SR-71 use.
The stealth fighter, the stealth bomber, HUGE numbers of UFO reports during the development period, a huge falloff after press releases were made on those aircraft.
UAV development, HUGE UFO report increase during the development period. Dropped way off when knowledge of the devices became public.

Then, there is the propeller hat crowd, who see clouds, contrails, birds, aircraft and even balloons are ET visiting.
Never bought into ET visiting us. One listen to radio over the generations and our very first television broadcast that reached space would chase ANY intelligent species away. Why visit a planet where the "intelligent" populace are killing each other off at wholesale levels on an incessant basis?
That would be about as brilliant as exploring a busy bee hive with your tongue.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Good on them!
written by CarriePoppy, November 08, 2012
It's really an admirable move on the part of these groups to continue looking for the truth, even when it goes against what they've believed historically. Color me impressed.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by RobertoDebunker, November 08, 2012
Carrie, don't give the UFO promoters credit they don't deserve. This article is B.S., as I explain in my Blog entry about it on BadUFOs:
http://badufos.blogspot.com/20...p-on.html
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy