|
Our associate in Hungary, Gabor Hrasko, informs us of this alarming situation:
You might be unaware of the fact that EU [the European Union] is promoting homeopathy and other alternative medicine in its directives. It urges the member countries to provide a simplified registration process for homeopathic remedies where the efficacy and safety of these drugs does not have to be proven. Chapter 2/Article 13/Paragraph 2 states:
Member States shall establish a special simplified registration procedure for the homeopathic medicinal products.
Hungary did it immediately. In my opinion it is against the Competition Act, as it provides exceptions for homeopathic remedies. It uses pseudoscientific reasoning, like "it can not cause harm due to the high dilution" while it does not use the same reasoning to realize that it could not have a specific effect due to that same fact.
All-in-all, homeopathy remains an important issue for the European skeptics, not only because it is a clear example of pseudoscience (as it is handled by the US skeptics), but because IN SPITE OF THIS it is a widely used practice. In Hungary and in many other countries it is used by real doctors who spent six years in prestigious universities studying physics, chemistry and evidence-based medicine earlier.
I must ask: Just why are such exceptions - "special procedures" - granted to quack notions, just because they are popular delusions? Do we have to wait for major losses of life to occur, with the inevitable monstrous lawsuits that would ensue, before anyone assigns any importance to stopping fraudulent systems before they get to that state? I once thought that the EU was a splendid idea, but then I addressed a meeting in Oslo before Norway joined up, and found that those before me had no notion of the true nature of this farcical concept called homeopathy. Did they react to my exposure? No, they opted to go along with the fraud, anyway...
Trackback(0)
 |
What would happen if a person who was suffering some sort of pain took a homeopathic remedy prescribed by a doctor, and reported back that the homeopathic dilution amplified the pain to a level that was excruciating. Pain that literally brought them to tears. They then sued the doctor or the homeopathic company for malpractice, not for failing to cure the original ailment with a treatment that is not proven, but for prescribing a solution that was just too strong. Something along the lines of the pain memory in the water unequivocally adding to their existing pain.
It would be an interesting legal defence.