The Amazing Meeting 2014

Like it? Share it!

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



"Champ" Visits Again PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Jeff Wagg   

I am fortunate to live very near a lake with its own lake monster. With the exception of the well-debunked Loch Ness Monster, "Champ" or the Lake Champlain Monster in Vermont is probably the most well known "cryptid" of its kind. Of course, I don't believe there actually is a lake monster, with the exception of this one.

Last week, a gentleman by the name of Eric Olsen posted a video to YouTube which shows a shape moving in the early-morning waters of Lake Champlain just off of Oak Ledge Park in Burlington. It's interesting footage, and well worth a look.

As with any unusual video of something moving in the water, people were quick to shout "There's Champ!" But noted-skeptic Ben Radford, co-author of the book Lake Monster Mysteries is an expert on Champ, and posted his analysis at livescience.com.

From Ben's article:

The video holds several clues about the creature's identity. The form resembles the back and head of a swimming deer, and moves toward the near shore past what appears to be a buoy, which might suggest shallow water.

When analyzing videos such as this, what we don't see is often just as important as what we do see. In this case the video abruptly ends as the animal nears shore.

It seems very odd that the last part of the sequence is missing. Surely if the cameraman was intrigued enough by the sight to spend two minutes recording it he didn't suddenly lose interest, stop recording, and turn away. The eyewitness was supposedly worried about running out of memory on his cell phone. That may be true, or perhaps he chose to edit out the last seconds of the sequence, when we could all see if it was indeed a deer climbing ashore. Though I doubt a hoax, there are many unanswered questions about the sighting.

The creator of the film does not claim it's a monster; he just says its something strange. He's made the video private and disabled comments, but finally made the video public again. There's something about all this that bothers him. Like Ben, I also don't think it's a hoax, but I think he could see more than the video shows, and my guess is the attention has him spooked a bit.

Regardless, we now have video of something interesting. First off, Ben's correct: deer and moose do swim, moose especially. It is not a rare occurrence. To test the deer theory, I searched on YouTube for videos of swimming ungulates to compare them.

The first video clearly shows a deer swimming in the water. This tells us that deer do swim, they swim long distances, and gives us a general idea of what they look like. The head is significantly above water, the back is below, and this shape doesn't change much. Despite these differences, it does resemble at least portions of the Olsen video.

The second one, shot from a much longer distance, looks remarkably like the Olsen footage. However, how do we explain the portions where the object has much more mass breaking the surface, an the head shape is different?

I have a simple theory about this: the animal is walking. Olsen claims the water is 8 feet at times in that part of the lake. A fully grown moose can be as much as 7 feet high at the shoulder. This gives ample room for a neck and shoulders to be above water. Note also that moose have very thick necks, unlike their white-tailed deer cousin.

My guess/interpretation is that the video is of a female moose, that is tired, and swimming in shallow enough water that her feet sometimes touch bottom. When this happens, her back rises above the water. The point in the video where she is still, and the suddenly sinks deepers is a ledge of some sort on the lake bottom, and her delay is her trying to find footing.

There you have, in my opinion (and Ben's obviously) a likely explanation for what was observed.

In any other lake, there probably wouldn't be a question at all. But you see... this is Lake Champlain... home to a monster! So, of course people assume "monster" for anything even slightly out of the ordinary. As I (and others) have said before "believing is seeing." Once you have a pattern or idea in your mind, you seek to confirm it, and any unexplained thing can fit the bill.

The thing is, we're smart enough to know this about ourselves. Using critical thinking, we can overcome the urge to cry "monster" and instead dispassionately examine a video such as this and come up with a likely explanation. It's a shame that more people don't want to do that.

To illustrate this point, check out this video posted on June 5th, 2009 from Addison, VT which is about 30 miles south of the Olsen video. It surprises me that any rural Vermonter would suspect that this "creature" was Champ. In fact, here is a nice, clear, daylight and closeup view of what I strongly suspect is the same creature. It's true that this species is very primitive and dates back a very long time, but monster it is not.

And another example, here's an article from the Press Republican out of Plattsburg, NY which is on the western bank of the lake. It seems "Champ" appeared again on June 5, just a few days after the Olsen video. Why do such sightings often come in groups? Because the pattern of "monster" was reinforced in the public's mind by the Olsen video. That's my explanation, anyway.

From the article:

"It didn't move like a snake," said Roberts, owner of Adirondack Birch Worx furniture shop in Plattsburgh. "It was not like a porpoise or dolphin, either. It moved straight and fast, with its bumps up high and then down lower in the water.

"I've never seen anything like it before," he added, noting that he grew up on Cumberland Head and has seen 20-foot lake sturgeon close up before.

The creature's skin was "whale-like," he said, and had a shiny greenish black tint to it.

It's getting near sundown (which coincides perfectly with the sighting), the fish have stopped biting, and something is moving rapidly near the dock. It's not a 20 foot sturgeon, it doesn't move like a snake (why would it?), so it must be a monster... or maybe it could be another explanation that Ben Radford is familiar with.

It's possible that one or both of these sightings are of some unknown creature, space aliens, or ghosts. But why believe any of those when there are reasonable explanations at hand? The answer, I think is simple. If you see a monster, alien, or ghost, you are special. You are one of the "chosen few" who have experienced something amazing. It can be a very powerful feeling, and not one that you're willing to give up. I've experienced this myself, though in the end, curiosity always won out over feeling special. But I'll tell you what.. you can feel special by coming up with a supported and plausible explanation as well. You may not ever learn the definitive truth, so you can't be sure, but you can rest at ease knowing that the next time you see something, you'll be armed with curiosity rather than fear.

Trackback(0)
Comments (21)Add Comment
...
written by kaivulagi, June 08, 2009
Well after all- If it walks like a moose, and if it swims like a moose then.....
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Where's that link?
written by gebobs, June 09, 2009
Is it just me or are hyperlinks on JREF difficult to find? No hyperlinks are underlined and I find myself tracing my mouse over the text to locate them. As far as I can tell, the links are indistinguishable from regular text. Maybe it's my color blindness. I don't know.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by Thanny, June 09, 2009
First, there's no European variety of Moose that looks like an Elk. There's a single species of Moose, which just happens to be called an Elk in Europe. The species we call Elk is closely related to (but distinct from) a European species called the Red Deer.

Second, I have no problem spotting hyperlinks, but I've little doubt that I would if color blind, since they aren't underlined for me, but differ only in color as rusty red on black. It used to be that all hyperlinks were blue, and, if the browser was so configured, underlined. Now, web designers often put style over functionality. Links that aren't links (JavaScript abominations that prevent you from opening links in new windows or tabs), links of an arbitrary color that differs from site to site, and no underline whether you want it or not.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Champ Isn't Only Loon
written by Jim Shaver, June 09, 2009
Champ is a Loon. How apropos is that?! smilies/grin.gif

Gebobs, I see the dull-red hyperlinks in my browser. Thanny, I feel your pain, Brother.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Link color
written by JeffWagg, June 09, 2009
I'm looking into doing something to make the links stand out more. The dull red color is the default for the template.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Moose
written by JeffWagg, June 09, 2009
Yes, I think I got the moose thing backwards. I'll correct that. Thanks. (There is one species of moose with 5 subspecies, but they're not different enough to mention in the article.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by pxatkins, June 09, 2009
Just curious ... is Champlain in the US pronounced with the ch as in church or as in champagne? It might go some way to explaining the sham in champlain smilies/wink.gif

EDITED BY JEFFWAGG: sham-PLANE, named for the French explorer who "discovered" the lake (and the thousands of Abenaki living on it.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Reed, June 09, 2009
I note from the video that the aquatic creature rises and falls, perhaps due to the shallowness of the water in that area.

If this story doesn't go away and someone in the area is looking for an investigative opportunity, they could survey the water depth in that area.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by bigjohn756, June 09, 2009
Whatever that thing is(I vote for a deer) it sure looks tired to me, very tired. Also, I'll bet the photographer saw what it was when it reached shore.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by gebobs, June 09, 2009
Thanks for looking into doing the links another way. Color blindness is a real problem for me. I can see colors and can usually tell what they are. But some shades of certain colors, even when next to each other, are indistinguishable to me.

I am red-green color blind which is sexually linked and was passed to me from my maternal grandfather. No one else in my immediate family is color blind. The range of colors is not restricted to red and green and not all shades are affected. For example, I first noticed it when my brother and I were playing backgammon at the beach when I was a kid. The stones were (supposedly) dark red and dark brown. They may as well have been all black for all I could tell.

It never ceases to amaze me that some people can see things I cannot, the hyperlinks here for example. I've taken those tests with the colored dots and even if someone tells me the answer, I still can't see it.

Interestingly, it's hypothesized that color blindness might confer evolutionary advantage allowing the person to "see through" camouflage. So, I got that going for me.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by AlmightyBob, June 09, 2009
Jim Shaver said >> Champ is a Loon.

Hard to tell the size by the video, but my immediate reaction was also that it's just a loon. Head and neck clearly visible, body sits very low in the water.

For example: http://www.leisureislandhouseb...s/loon.jpg
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Phatchick96, June 09, 2009
IMO, it looked like the head of a big dog. Probably Rover decided to go for a swim.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Steel Rat, June 09, 2009
I think Jeff's explanation is the most plausible.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Colour blindness.
written by BillyJoe, June 10, 2009
gebobs,

I am red-green color blind which is sexually linked
smilies/grin.gif
It's sex-linked. smilies/wink.gif

it's hypothesized that color blindness might confer evolutionary advantage allowing the person to "see through" camouflage.
It's most likely just a defect, sorry, and the apparent increase in night vision is probably accidental.


My father was colour blind which he did not know till I picked up on it years after I sold my first car. He then felt comfortable enough to tell me how much he hated the colour - brilliant yellow! It was, in fact a sort of lime green.

How does it look to you.



I got this from the net. I have one of my own, but I'm standing alongside it sporting a rather long head of hair from back in my Led Zeppelin days.

BillyJoe
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Steel Rat, June 10, 2009
Lol, was that before or after you jumped off the Tallahachee bridge?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by BillyJoe, June 10, 2009
The first time someone cracked that joke I had to look it up, but that was a long time ago. smilies/wink.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Steel Rat, June 10, 2009
Well, I grew up in Virginia, heard the song quite a bit when I was a kid.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by AlmightyBob, June 11, 2009
Ok, re my previous comment, I only saw the crappy little video clip on this page (still looks like a loon) - didn't see the Youtube link (dam' those hard-to-read dull read links smilies/smiley.gif - definitely not a loon)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
It is a bird ...
written by steenkh, June 12, 2009
When I see that short sequence of the "Champ" it seems quite clear that it is a bird, specifically a Diver. The way it holds its head suggests the Red-throated Diver:
smilies/shocked.giffficial&sa=X&um=1' />
But the Red-throated Diver would normally look a little more pale. Perhaps this a result of the backlighted situation, and the bad quality of the film.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by José, June 12, 2009
It doesn't look alive to me. I think it's a log.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy