Like it? Share it!

Banner


Reason Rally Logo
 

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



TAM London: A Brilliant Success! PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Phil Plait   
Thursday, 08 October 2009 12:08

[Note: all the pictures here, and more, are in my TAM London Flickr set.]

TAM London has come and gone, but it's left quite a wide swath. The Amaz!ng Meetings 1-7 have all been, well, amazing, and so this one, the James Randi Educational Foundation's first international conference, had a lot to live up to.

I think we did pretty well.

In fact (to use an Americanism), this ball was hit way out of the park. The speakers were incredible: Brian Cox talking about the Large Hadron Collider and the origin of gravity, Simon Singh on his well-publicized libel lawsuit involving craven chiropractors, Ben Goldacre and bad medicine, Ariane Sherine on the atheist bus campaign and her new book, The Atheist's Guide to Christmas (for which I wrote an essay), and so many more. Professor Richard Wiseman emceed the event, and was fantastic at revving the audience up and keeping things moving -- it was a tough choice to have him host rather than give a talk, but he did such a tremendous job I may never want to hear him give a talk again.

Um. Yeah. You know what I mean.

It was an anglocentric meeting, with mostly UK speakers by design. The exceptions were me, musician and skeptic George Hrab, and of course My Close Personal Friend Adam Savage™. There was a comedy show Saturday night featuring Robin Ince and friends, too.

The highlight for me was Tim Minchin. He is a brilliant musician, and not only skeptical, but incredibly funny. He has critical thinking messages relayed with extreme and laser-focused humor in his songs. I laughed my head off, and when I wasn't bent over double I checked the room to see everyone else in hysterics as well. He did his extraordinary nine minute beat poem "Storm", about a fictional believer in nonsense he meets at a dinner party. It's an excrutiatingly funny compendium of woo and how reality stomps it flat. Tim is frakkin' awesome. He owned that crowd, and deservedly so. He's a monster of skepticism.

 

 

A real delight for the audience was a live video Q&A with Randi via Skype. They were able to directly ask Randi questions, and he pontificated as only he can in response. Although skeptics by nature tend not to follow authority terribly well, Randi is something of a touchstone in the skeptical movement. It is directly through his work that the modern movement, such as it is, exists at all, so getting to talk to him is a treat.

My talk was last. I decided to go with my lecture on asteroid impacts, since it's timely and does have a lot of skeptical content. I think people enjoyed it -- making fun of "Armageddon" is shooting fish in a barrel. When I was reviewing the talk a few days earlier, I realized that I would be giving it in a city hit hard by rocket attacks in World War II. Yet that same technology, just a few decades later, may save the entire human race from destruction by a rock from space. That sort of syzygy was too good not to discuss, so I ended with it.

We closed the meeting with a wrap-up and thanks, and got a standing ovation that went on and on. These folks were applauding the JREF and TAM London, but I get the very strong feeling they were also demonstrating their own emotional support for themselves, for all of us who are active skeptics. We go out and try to make the world a better place, a more real place, and you know what? I think we do deserve a little respect for that. It's a tough job, but it's one we love to do, and one we need to do.

We knew in advance that the UK audience would be a good one; there is so much good critical thinking work being done in England and its neighbors. But even knowing that I was overwhelmed with the generosity, support, good nature, and overall enthusiasm of the audience. You may have been applauding us, but you can be sure we applaud you as well.

And will there be a TAM London 2? Well, we can't promise, of course. But given how big this one was, how much fun it was, and how great the audience was, well, I wouldn't be too surprised to see another British invasion sometime soon.

[Edited to add: I should never post in a hurry; I inevitably leave off something important! In this case, it was to personally thank Tracy King from February Marketing and Skepchick for being the JREF's event planner for TAM London! Tracy did a fantastic job getting things put together, especially when -- as they always do for big events -- things didn't go according to plan. Despite a postal strike, a balky printer, and a hundred other speed bumps, Tracy and her crew managed to make the meeting run smoothly and efficiently. My hat's off to Tracy and all the people who were behind the scenes at TAM London!]


Other people have been writing about TAM London as well. Here are a few samples:

The BBC

Aardvarkology on TAML Saturday

Aardvarkology on TAML Sunday

Jack of Kent

Sunny Spells and Scattered Showers

Bruce Hood

The Londonist

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (19)Add Comment
...
written by daveg703, October 08, 2009
Well, Phil- thanks for nothing. Here I had almost forgotten my disappointment at not being able to attend TAML-1, and was feeling pretty good today. Then I open up the JREF site this morning, only to be greeted with a glowing description of all that I had missed- and there goes my day. smilies/cry.gif

Ah, but it is reassuring to know that such valuable meetings are taking place somewhere, even if not a short jaunt from my front door. Thanks for a splendid report! smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by Soapy Sam, October 08, 2009
More tickets next time Phil!
Being only 400 miles away and unable to get in was a bit of a downer, but I'm glad it went so well and congrats to the organisers!
Next time, the Albert Hall!

I saw Tim Minchin in Glasgow last year. The "No BS" message was loud and clear there too. I was not just impressed by Tim's thoughtful comedic originality - and he does a good manic-intensive Beethoven impression too- but I was really amazed by his audience. They were young. They were hip. (Except me). They knew their man and they knew their minds. It was a sell out - and every one, by their reactions, a sceptic with a great sense of humour. Yet when I asked on the forum, not one of them , it seems , was a JREF forum member!
We might think that means we're doing something wrong. I don't think so. I think it implies JREF is no minority, but the tip of a very big iceberg, afloat in a sea of stupid, but square in the path of the leaky liners of lunacy.

We just need to get that nine tenths of the rational population above the surface, where it can be seen.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by Chris H, October 08, 2009
...and TAM Down Under? ;-)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by rjh02, October 08, 2009
I read the article and all I could find was that several people gave talks about things they had done and one person sang for her supper. What these people had done had "hit the ball way out the park". But I can find nothing in the article that said how TAM itself "hit the ball way out the park" as per the introduction.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -9
Me too
written by Na, October 08, 2009
Just putting my vote in for TAM Australia (preferrably Melbourne smilies/wink.gif)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Dooyoowoowoo, October 08, 2009
I've just read the Alex Jones "report" (and very painful it was). It's the comments that bother me, mostly anti-british rants from people whose grasp on reality is tenuous at best. It seems I must be related to satan and all his minions.
Congratulations on TAM, sounds like a great time.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Missed it
written by Stitch, October 09, 2009
Congratulations for the success of TAML1.
I was short listed for tickets and had waited eagerly until the opportunity came to buy.
£200 knocked me back and I had to refrain. Not because I personally would not have paid, just that I wanted my partner to accompany me so that we could both experience a party of like thinkers. The cost for us both considering hotel and travel (from up north) would have been way beyond our budget.
When TAML2 comes around we will be there. I'll be putting a little away each month. My only recourse is to join the local Sceptics in the Pub.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by bjornart, October 09, 2009
I had a great time, but I think skeptics applaud too much. The length of the applauses probably added up to a significant percentage of the total time, and could have been better spent listening to the speakers. Richard Wiseman is probably to blame by setting the bar at the beginning and demanding _more_ applause for his own opening words. Of course, some of you might be skeptical of my claim, but once the DVD is out I'm going to time all the applauses, so there!
Still it was all great. Until Phil shoved me into a pit of envy by showing off his picture of him and Felicia Day.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Next Please!
written by Greg1138, October 09, 2009
Was disappointed that I joined the skeptic world too late to register for TAM London - serves me right for being a pratt and buying in to woo earlier in life, I guess!!

So - hopefully there's going to be a TAML II? Pretty please? One with more spaces (may I suggest the Albert Hall? You'd still fill it 3 times over) and just maaaaaybe a lower price tag?

Go on - you know you want to....
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
TAM 2 London
written by rosie, October 10, 2009
Yes, please make the next one much bigger. Before long there should be a smart new Olympic stadium for hire.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by pillock, October 11, 2009
I'm another one who couldn't get in and I agree, the Albert Hall might be big enough. Can you please tell us how many people wanted to come?
Looking forward to the DVDs.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by GeekGoddess, October 12, 2009
Other than Dr. Wiseman's request for long applause at the beginning, I didn't notice overly-long applause. My instinct tells me that not only were attendees applauding for the speakers, but also for the fun and community of being together with like-minded people. Yes, it's all about preaching to the choir, but when you're in a world surrounded by woo and belief in nonsense, one is invigorated by being in such a crowd.

Considering the venue, the city, that some meals were included, and that possibly some of the speakers may have had part of their expenses covered, I don't the think price was out of line. I attend business conferences that cost more than this, and of which I get much less satisfaction. The overall cost of attending obviously goes up when it is held in a city with high hotel and food costs, but I'd rather spend a few days in London than Vegas, an extremely cheap city, any time.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by GeekGoddess, October 12, 2009
Forgot to add: I didn't hear many negatives among the attendees, the only one being that people didn't care for standing up while eating. At that venue, there didn't seem to be any alternative, but my friends solved the problem by going over to a pub for lunch and dinner rather than the meals provided. I think Tracy did an excellent job.

As a note, in Phil's links, the first one does not actually link to the BBC piece, but rather to Phil's own blog about TAM and the BBC article. However, the correct link is in his blog, near the top of his post.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Brilliant Success? Not for most people!
written by Alexander, October 12, 2009
I'm with Daveg703 on this one. When you've finished patting yourselves on the back, spare a thought for all of us who desperately wanted to get involved and couldn't. I pointed out here weeks before the event that you picked a venue with not enough capacity. It was exactly the same last year when Randi came to speak in London, impossible to get tickets unless you know someone on the inside. I've given up trying to get involved with the JREF, you clearly only want famous academics and tv stars.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
I must not be most people then...
written by yngve, October 13, 2009
I get your frustration, but getting a venue without going out on a limb on economically there was not that many choises.
Remember that this was for all intents and purposes a stab in the dark (charcoal grey at least) for the JREF, but boy did they hit the mark with this one. And this stab may be remembered as a mere poke at the woo compared to what may come if the interrest is taken seriously.
Allthough I were one of the lucky bastards to get a ticket, the mere fact that I live in Norway, met people from Canada, Hungary, Switzerland and more at TAML shows that the limiting factor on getting a ticket was how eager one was when the sale started. Not what country you live in. I'm also a mere newbie what JREF is concerned and not a scientist rockstar but a humble engineer. Also i talked to lots of other "nobodies" who just happened to be eager skeptics, so the 'being a skeptic/science celebrity' can not be a factor either.

I'm sort of (someone had to loose for me to win smilies/wink.gif) sorry for all those of you that didn't get a ticket, but hey, it's not the end of the world (that's due in 2012, remember smilies/tongue.gif) and hopefully there will be a TAML-2 next year.

So, even if this was a "small" start, it revealed a hughe potential and the need for a bigger venue.
I'd really be surprised if there was no follow up on this one, as it shows that people from the whole of Europe and even other parts of the world can be expected to be interrested in such an event.

All in all thumbs up to JREF, Tracy King and all the others who worked to put TAML together.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
in response to yngve
written by Alexander, October 16, 2009
This was not a stab in the dark. In 2008 Randi came to speak in London and 500 tickets sold out in hours. I discovered that the venue for TAM London was a similar size before tickets went on sale and made the prediction that it wouldn't be big enough both on this website and on the TAM website. If I knew it was going to happen why didn't the JREF? Greater London has a population of around 13 million people, a venue of 500 people was always going to be inadequate. You don't need to be psychic to make the prediction.

I think it's desperately sad that an organisation with such worthy ideals is crippled by the fact that it has been hijacked by elite academics and celebrities who just don't want to include ordinary people.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
in response to Alexander
written by sadluxation, October 19, 2009
Hi Alex.

I understand your frustration in not being able to secure tickets to the last two events in London. I was one of the organisers of "An Evening with James Randi and Friends" in 2008 and, to be frank, we were up against it.
The tickets did not sell out in hours, but took around two weeks to sell out the 500 capacity venue at Conway Hall and they were sold on a publicly accessible merchant site. We only had less than a month to organise the whole event and it made no money for the JREF.

The bottom line is, the JREF has to expend a large amount of money to secure venues for events with the risk that they still may not make anything back for fund-raising and education. There were no sponsors, grants or paid advertising at either of the events insofar as I know.
A similarly priced conference in London, such as the World Conference of Science Journalists costs more for admission and had over 1000 people attend.

So, I think it's desperately sad that an organisation with such worthy ideals is crippled by the fact that no-one wants to put up the funds for a bigger, better and accessible conference.

I think it's about time you opened your cheque book and made a small donation to the JREF?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Thanks for the response sadluxation...
written by Alexander, October 19, 2009
... but it doesn't make me feel any happier. I don't know where you got the idea that the Evening with James Randi event sold out in two weeks. That was just plain wrong. The Randi website here http://www.randi.org/site/inde...-2008.html claims it was sold out in 48 hours, and I failed to get a ticket much earlier than that. But that isn't the point. After that fiasco you must have realised that a bigger venue was required. Making the mistake once when you're "up against it" is fine. It's the fact that it happened twice that is the issue. It's all very well you saying yopu don't have the cash to put up front for a bigger venue and you may not get it back. You've surely proved that more than 500 people are willing to cough up. Incidentally, London is not the only place in Britain to hold a conference, but it is almost certainly the most expensive.

As for your comment about me opening my chequebook, I've been trying to give my time to the JREF for years. I've written pieces for the web page, and I would be happy to pay for tickets to events, but you don't want me. I've given up trying to get involved. I'm fed up with the "only our gang are allowed" mentality. Asking me for a donation is just rubbing salt into the wound.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
newshopstyle
written by newshopstyle, November 02, 2009
This versatile styling tool has an ergonomic design and curved edge plates to create any style from straight to curly and everything in between. With a flash heating element and fixed temperature setting, the power to create the style of your dreams is your hands.
GHD
GHD IV Styler
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated on Thursday, 08 October 2009 23:08