Like it? Share it!

TAM2013-VERTICAL-BANNER-1

Sign up for news and updates!






Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

CAPTCHA image
Please leave this field empty

Login Form



Success Story Time! PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Barbara Drescher   
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 11:13

We often talk about the need to learn the process of science, rather than simply memorizing the things that science has discovered. In fact, “science literacy” is defined by most as a combined knowledge of process and information. Indeed, the national science education standards state that “A literate citizen should be able to evaluate the quality of scientific information on the basis of its source and the methods used to generate it.”

Evaluating the quality of scientific information is not easy, especially in areas in which the methods are complex. In my own field of psychology, most undergraduates are terrified of the core requirements for the major: intermediate statistics and research methods. These are notoriously difficult courses, but without them it is nearly impossible to evaluate the quality of any study in the field.

So if college students have a tough time understanding the scientific method or how to use knowledge of it to properly evaluate claims, how can we expect middle school students to learn this?

Read more...
 
The Meaning of Honest Lying PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Jamy Ian Swiss   
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 09:00

What’s it mean to be “an honest liar?”

The magician Karl Germain, a famous American stage performer at the turn of the 20th century, said that: “Conjuring is the only absolutely honest profession – the conjuror promises to deceive, and does.”

Germain nailed it. Once I use the word “magician,” I’m saying: I’m going to fool you. But that’s okay – it’s my job.

Whereas a self-proclaimed psychic who is aware of his own deceptions – and you can’t bend a spoon with sleight-of-hand without knowing that you are doing so – is being a dishonest liar. He’s lying about the fact that he’s lying. He’s saying: No, honest, I’m telling you the truth: It’s not a trick. I have supernatural powers.

Well I say: Screw that lying SOB and the unicorn he rode in on.

Read more...
 
This Week In Doubtful News PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Sharon Hill   
Tuesday, 19 March 2013 09:00

Here is a rundown of the top stories in scams, shams and outrageous claims from the past week courtesy of Doubtful News.

Skeptics were causing trouble this week. Well-informed and well-qualified science bloggers poked holes in a questionable acupuncture study. The main author didn't take too kindly to criticism

A few people associated with the word "skeptic" caused a row over at TED, an organization that stages and promotes talks on new ideas, when they featured some less than rational talks, lately. 

The Nigerian scam is still around because it works, even on law firms. 

Read more...
 
Last Week In Science-Based Medicine PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Dr. Harriet Hall   
Monday, 18 March 2013 09:00

Here is a recap of the stories that appeared last week at Science-Based Medicine, a multi-author skeptical blog that separates the science from the woo-woo in medicine.

Three myths about Stanislaw Burzynski and The Skeptics (David Gorski) http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/three-myths-about-stanislaw-burzynski-and-the-skeptics/ Supporters of Burzynski, the “antineoplaston” cancer doctor, are spreading myths. Three of the most flagrant ones: (1) a cabal of skeptics are conspiring to terrorize cancer patients and feed them misinformation, (2) Burzynski is a pioneer of gene-targeted cancer therapy, and (3) Eric Merola (who made the 2 movies about Burzynski) is an objective reporter with no agenda. Dr. Gorski sets the record straight.

Read more...
 
HIV Denial in the 21st Century PDF Print E-mail
Swift
Written by Dr. Steven Novella   
Saturday, 16 March 2013 09:00

It must be tough to be an HIV denier these days. Back in the 1980s HIV was just being discovered and researched. The connection to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) quickly became clear, but the early treatments (remember AZT) were minimally effective.

One of the primary arguments of those who, for various reasons, decided to deny the connection between HIV and AIDS (or even the existence of HIV), was that anti-HIV treatment was ineffective in preventing or treating AIDS.
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Page 14 of 355