Sign up for news and updates!

Enter word seen below
Visually impaired? Click here to have an audio challenge played.  You will then need to enter the code that is spelled out.
Change image

Please leave this field empty

Login Form

Shocker – Skeptics and Believers Think Differently PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. Steve Novella   
Friday, 10 January 2014 12:00

This is actually interesting research, but I do feel that too much is made of the fact that we see differences in brain activity when different groups react differently to stimuli. Everything you think and feel are networks firing in the brain. When research looking at the patterns of brain activity is reported, however, it often makes it sound like it’s surprising that such differences are “in the brain,” as if this makes the differences more biological or fundamental.

In any case, what this recent study looked at was 23 volunteers (12 believers and 11 skeptics) who were separated into their respective groups by a questionnaire – do you think that psychics can predict the future, etc. They “first imagined themselves in critical life situations (e.g. problems in intimate relationships) and then watched emotionally charged pictures of lifeless objects and scenery (e.g. two red cherries bound together).”

Man Doesn't Bite Dog PDF Print E-mail
Written by Jamy Ian Swiss   
Thursday, 09 January 2014 15:41

So it turns out the predictions made by professional psychics of events they expected to occur in 2013 were substantially wrong.

Or in other words: dog bites man!

The Internet makes it even easier these days to track these dolts and their fact-free babblings. Here’s a link at that records for posterity the “Psychic Predictions 2013” of psychics Lamont Hamilton, Vicki Monroe, Psychic Nikki, Sidney Friedman, Judy Hevenly (Get it? Better than a stripper named Debbie Takitoff.), Blair Robertson, Craig and Jane Hamilton-Parker, and The Amazing (one man’s opinion) Kreskin.

Is there a bigger single page of wrong anywhere on the web? Hard to imagine. (I checked and there’s no site at although somebody owns the domain name.)

It's not a contest PDF Print E-mail
Written by James Randi   
Tuesday, 07 January 2014 16:45

While I'm very pleased that the Czech skeptic club Sisyphus, the Belgian SKEPP club, and the European skeptical group ECSO have recognized the James Randi Educational Foundation, I must correct the use of the term "contest" to describe the JREF's million-dollar prize. (See the article here: )

It is simply a prize, not a competition, that can be won by any person who can prove the existence of any paranormal ability of any kind.

We at the JREF will follow this situation with great interest, but our experience has shown that the "psychics" will remain shy and often fail to show up to be tested...

Gee, a million dollars, and they're so reluctant? But we know why, don't we...?

James Randi, JREF founder.

A silly start: This week in Doubtful News for January 7, 2014 PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sharon Hill   
Tuesday, 07 January 2014 09:00

 Off to a rollicking start for 2014. Here is a rundown of the strange stories that the media fed to us for this past week courtesy of Doubtful News.

What's one of the first stories from New Years Eve? A ghost along the Thames. It's unimpressive.

Also unimpressive but really laughable, as usual, are the "top psychic" predictions for 2014. Have a look and a chuckle.

Right before New Year's Eve, we posted a story about a UFO group in Sweden expecting an increase in calls regarding lights in the sky that were actually Chinese Lanterns - floating luminaries.

The day after the New Year, the California media (who obviously don't keep up with Doubtful News, haha), went overboard for UFO stories of what were OBVIOUSLY Chinese Lanterns across Sacramento. They appeared to do ZERO checking on the story.

Last Week In Science Based Medicine PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dr. Harriet Hall   
Monday, 06 January 2014 09:00

Here is a recap of the stories that appeared last week at Science-Based Medicine, a multi-author skeptical blog that separates the science from the woo-woo in medicine.

Science-based medicine throughout time (David Gorski) A review of medical history shows how modern medicine has benefited from painstaking scientific discoveries, mainly in the last 150 years. Medicine 300 years ago resembled much of today’s “alternative” medicine. The ideas of alternative medicine don’t change, while the practices of science-based medicine give way as new discoveries are made. Today’s science-based medicine may look primitive to doctors of the future, but that’s not a reason for shame or for abandoning it in favor of any non-science-based system.

Doctors Are Not “Only Out to Make Money” (Harriet Hall) accusation that doctors are motivated solely by money is demonstrably untrue. Most doctors are committed to doing what is in the best interests of the patient regardless of the effect on their income. As new evidence becomes available, they are constantly changing their practices to eliminate the unnecessary and the ineffective even if it is lucrative. The contrast with CAM providers is striking.

<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Page 17 of 406